The digital outcry: What incites participation behavior in an online firestorm?

Brands, celebrities, or politicians are increasingly facing enormous online outrages in response to moral misconducts. These online firestorms are characterized by high message volume, indignant tonality, and negative opinion climate. Based on the concept of moral panics, this article analyzes why people join online firestorms. We argue that participation behavior is driven by a moral compass and a desire for social recognition. Results of an experiment and a content analysis of user comments show that a higher number of participants decreases users’ willingness to participate but fosters compliance with the prevalent opinion and tonality of the comments. We also observe that a higher moral arousal of the issue increases perceived similarity with previous participants, which in turn affects whether and how people participate. In total, our results indicate the importance of social context for participation behavior in an online firestorm.

[1]  Bruno S. Frey,et al.  Digital Social Norm Enforcement: Online Firestorms in Social Media , 2016, PloS one.

[2]  Jörg Lindenmeier,et al.  Consumer outrage: Emotional reactions to unethical corporate behavior ☆ , 2012 .

[3]  John Suler,et al.  The Online Disinhibition Effect , 2004, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[4]  J. Walther Theories of Computer-Mediated Communication and Interpersonal Relations , 2011 .

[5]  Naomi Ellemers,et al.  Group virtue: the importance of morality (vs. competence and sociability) in the positive evaluation of in-groups. , 2007, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[6]  Banwari Mittal A comparative analysis of four scales of consumer involvement , 1995 .

[7]  Lawrence Feick,et al.  The Effects of Preference Heterogeneity and Source Characteristics on Ad Processing and Judgements about Endorsers , 1992 .

[8]  Andrew J. Flanagin,et al.  Reconceptualizing ‘flaming’ and other problematic messages , 2003, New Media Soc..

[9]  N. Eisenberg Emotion, regulation, and moral development. , 2000, Annual review of psychology.

[10]  R. Spears,et al.  De‐individuation and group polarization in computer‐mediated communication , 1990 .

[11]  Philipp A. Rauschnabel,et al.  Collaborative Brand Attacks in Social Media: Exploring the Antecedents, Characteristics, and Consequences of a New Form of Brand Crises , 2016 .

[12]  Derek L. Hansen,et al.  Impact of Popularity Indications on Readers' Selective Exposure to Online News , 2005 .

[13]  Eun-Ju Lee,et al.  When and How Does Depersonalization Increase Conformity to Group Norms in Computer-Mediated Communication? , 2006, Commun. Res..

[14]  Karmen Erjavec,et al.  “You Don't Understand, This is a New War!” Analysis of Hate Speech in News Web Sites' Comments , 2012 .

[15]  R. Spears,et al.  Panacea or Panopticon? , 1994 .

[16]  Cliff Lampe,et al.  Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices , 2011, New Media Soc..

[17]  John O. Summers,et al.  Checking the Success of Manipulations in Marketing Experiments , 1986 .

[18]  John G. Lynch,et al.  Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: Myths and Truths about Mediation Analysis , 2010 .

[19]  D. Paulhus,et al.  Trolls just want to have fun , 2014 .

[20]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  Meme-tracking and the dynamics of the news cycle , 2009, KDD.

[21]  E. Goode,et al.  Moral panics: culture, politics, and social construction , 1994 .

[22]  Sabine A. Einwiller,et al.  Journalists’ Coverage of Online Firestorms in German-Language News Media , 2017 .

[23]  E. Noelle-Neumann The Spiral of Silence A Theory of Public Opinion , 1974 .

[24]  Stanley H. Cohen FOLK DEVILS AND MORAL PANICS: THE CREATION OF THE MODS AND ROCKERS. Stanley Cohen. London: Paladin, 1973, 224 pp. 50P (United Kingdom) , 1973 .

[25]  Milam W. Aiken,et al.  Flaming in electronic communication , 2004, Decis. Support Syst..

[26]  Katja Hutter,et al.  Firestorms: Modeling conflict diffusion and management strategies in online communities , 2017, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Dwayne D. Gremler,et al.  Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? , 2004 .

[28]  Katherine L. Milkman,et al.  What Makes Online Content Viral? , 2012 .

[29]  A. Hayes Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach , 2013 .

[30]  Eun-Ju Lee,et al.  What Do Others’ Reactions to News on Internet Portal Sites Tell Us? Effects of Presentation Format and Readers’ Need for Cognition on Reality Perception , 2010, Commun. Res..

[31]  Jonah A. Berger Word of mouth and interpersonal communication: A review and directions for future research , 2014 .

[32]  Sarah J. Jackson,et al.  Hijacking #myNYPD: Social Media Dissent and Networked Counterpublics , 2015 .

[33]  H. Tajfel,et al.  The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. , 2004 .

[34]  Vincent Cicchirillo,et al.  How could you think that?!?!: Understanding intentions to engage in political flaming , 2015, New Media Soc..

[35]  Nayla Fawzi,et al.  Can online exemplars trigger a spiral of silence? Examining the effects of exemplar opinions on perceptions of public opinion and speaking out , 2017, New Media Soc..

[36]  Dolf Zillmann,et al.  Exemplification Theory of Media Influence , 2002 .

[37]  J. Zaichkowsky Measuring the Involvement Construct , 1985 .

[38]  R. Baumeister A SELF-PRESENTATIONAL VIEW OF SOCIAL PHENOMENA , 1982 .

[39]  K. Varjas,et al.  High School Students’ Perceptions of Motivations for Cyberbullying: An Exploratory Study , 2010, The western journal of emergency medicine.

[40]  Eva M. Hyatt,et al.  A Critical Appraisal of Demand Artifacts in Consumer Research , 1991 .

[41]  Marc Ziegele,et al.  Conceptualizing Online Discussion Value: A Multidimensional Framework for Analyzing User Comments on Mass-Media Websites , 2013 .

[42]  Constanze Rossmann,et al.  Exemplification 2.0 , 2014, J. Media Psychol. Theor. Methods Appl..

[43]  Elmie Nekmat,et al.  Multiple Opinion Climates in Online Forums , 2013 .

[44]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  Social media self-efficacy and information evaluation online , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[45]  William Rand,et al.  Brand Buzz in the Echoverse , 2016 .

[46]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  Understanding online firestorms: Negative word-of-mouth dynamics in social media networks , 2014 .

[47]  S. Malinen,et al.  “Leave Your Comment Below”: Can Biased Online Comments Influence Our Own Prejudicial Attitudes and Behaviors? , 2015 .