Processes and Effects in the Construction of Social Reality

This study conceptualizes the cultivation effect in terms of the accessibility of information in memory. Contemporary social cognition research indicates that individuals consistenly use the most accessible information in memory as a basis for a variety of judgments. Consistent with this body of literature, the current study demonstrates that, based on a reaction time task, those subjects who watch comparatively more television not only overestimate frequency or probability but also give faster responses to various types of cultivation questions. These results support the notion that relevant information, presumably “cultivated” from television viewing, is more accessible in memory for heavier viewers, and, consistent with predictions made by the availability heuristic literature, overestimations of frequency or probability are associated with this enhanced accessibility. Moreover, when controlling for speed of response in the correlation between television viewing and social reality estimates, the relationship is diminished or disappears entirely, suggesting that enhanced accessibility of relevant information for heavier viewers can at least partially account for the cultivation effect.

[1]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Confidence in judgment: Persistence of the illusion of validity. , 1978 .

[2]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Judged frequency of lethal events , 1978 .

[3]  L. Gross,et al.  The demonstration of power: violence profile no. 10. , 1979, The Journal of communication.

[4]  W. James Potter,et al.  Examining Cultivation From a Psychological Perspective , 1991 .

[5]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Human cognition in its social context. , 1986, Psychological review.

[6]  On Not Learning from One's Own Mistakes: A Reanalysis of Gerbner et ally's Findings on Cultivation Analysis Part II , 1981 .

[7]  M. Zanna,et al.  Attitudinal qualities relating to the strength of the attitude-behavior relationship☆ , 1978 .

[8]  Robert P. Hawkins,et al.  UNIFORM MESSAGES AND HABITUAL VIEWING: UNNECESSARY ASSUMPTIONS IN SOCIAL REALITY EFFECTS , 1981 .

[9]  D. Ruble,et al.  Accuracy and differentiation in social prediction: A developmental perspective1 , 1980 .

[10]  J. Bargh,et al.  Nature of Priming Effects on Categorization , 1985 .

[11]  Tom R. Tyler,et al.  Assessing the Risk of Crime Victimization: The Integration of Personal Victimization Experience and Socially Transmitted Information , 1984 .

[12]  R. Wyer,et al.  Social Cognition, Inference, and Attribution , 1979 .

[13]  D. Pearl,et al.  Television and behavior : ten years of scientific progress and implications for the eighties , 1982 .

[14]  Robert P. Hawkins,et al.  Searching for Cognitive Processes in the Cultivation Effect Adult and Adolescent Samples in the United States and Australia , 1987 .

[15]  James A. Kulik,et al.  Schematic effects of social attitudes on information processing and recall. , 1980 .

[16]  L. Wheeler,et al.  Review of personality and social psychology , 1980 .

[17]  M. Zanna,et al.  On the predictive validity of attitudes: The roles of direct experience and confidence1 , 1978 .

[18]  C. Atkin,et al.  Sexual intimacy and drug use in TV series. , 1978, The Journal of communication.

[19]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability , 1973 .

[20]  Clifford R. Mynatt,et al.  Confirmation Bias in a Simulated Research Environment: An Experimental Study of Scientific Inference , 1977 .

[21]  Anthony N. Doob,et al.  Television viewing and fear of victimization: Is the relationship causal? , 1979 .

[22]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Handbook of Social Cognition , 1993 .

[23]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[24]  L. Gross,et al.  Living with television: the violence profile. , 1976, The Journal of communication.

[25]  M. Hughes,et al.  The Fruits of Cultivation Analysis: A Reexamination of Some Effects of Television Watching , 1980 .

[26]  J. Bruner.  On perceptual readiness. , 1957, Psychological review.

[27]  J. Harvey,et al.  New Directions in Attribution Research , 2018 .

[28]  Horace M. Newcomb.  Assessing the Violence Profile Studies of Gerbner and Gross , 1978 .

[29]  Michael A. Shapiro,et al.  Memory and Decision Processes in the Construction of Social Reality , 1991 .

[30]  Michael Morgan,et al.  Cultivation Analysis: New Directions in Media Effects Research , 1989 .

[31]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Self-Relevant Scenarios as Mediators of Likelihood Estimates and Compliance: Does Imagining Make It So? , 1982 .

[32]  W. James Potter,et al.  The Relationships between First- and Second-Order Measures of Cultivation. , 1991 .

[33]  Ana Kong,et al.  Life on television: Content analysis of U.S. TV drama: Bradley S. Greenberg (editor) Norwood, New Jersey; Ablex Publishing Co., 1980, 204 pages , 1981 .

[34]  Joseph P. Newman,et al.  The feature-positive effect in adult human subjects. , 1980 .

[35]  P C Wason,et al.  Reasoning about a Rule , 1968, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[36]  Ida E. Berger.  The Nature of Attitude Accessibility and Attitude Confidence: A Triangulated Experiment , 1992 .

[37]  Elizabeth M. Perse,et al.  Soap opera viewing patterns of college students and cultivation , 1986 .

[38]  P. Hirsch.  The “Scary World” of the Nonviewer and Other Anomalies , 1980 .

[39]  Clifford R. Mynatt,et al.  Consequences of Confirmation and Disconfirmation in a Simulated Research Environment , 1978 .

[40]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Memory and Cognition in Its Social Context , 1989 .

[41]  John Condry,et al.  The psychology of television , 1989 .

[42]  T. S. Robertson,et al.  Handbook of Consumer Behavior , 1990 .

[43]  Annie Lang,et al.  Making Television Reality , 1991 .

[44]  G. Jowett.  Film: the Democratic Art , 1976 .

[45]  R. Cialdini,et al.  Imagining Can Heighten or Lower the Perceived Likelihood of Contracting a Disease , 1985 .

[46]  Carol J. Williams,et al.  The Role of Attitude Accessibility in the Attitude-to-Behavior Process , 1989 .

[47]  S. Kaminsky.  American Film Genres , 1974 .

[48]  S. Pingree.  Children's Cognitive Processes in Constructing Social Reality , 1983 .

[49]  Eliot R. Smith,et al.  Exemplar-Based Model of Social Judgment , 1992 .

[50]  S. Coren,et al.  Attention : contemporary theory and analysis , 1972 .

[51]  T. Tyler,et al.  The mass media and judgments of risk: Distinguishing impact on personal and societal level judgments. , 1984 .