Strategic aspects of the probabilistic serial rule for the allocation of goods

The probabilistic serial (PS) rule is one of the most prominent randomized rules for the assignment problem. It is well-known for its superior fairness and welfare properties. However, PS is not immune to manipulative behaviour by the agents. We examine computational and non-computational aspects of strategising under the PS rule. Firstly, we study the computational complexity of an agent manipulating the PS rule. We present polynomial-time algorithms for optimal manipulation. Secondly, we show that expected utility best responses can cycle. Thirdly, we examine the existence and computation of Nash equilibrium profiles under the PS rule. We show that a pure Nash equilibrium is guaranteed to exist under the PS rule. For two agents, we identify two different types of preference profiles that are not only in Nash equilibrium but can also be computed in linear time. Finally, we conduct experiments to check the frequency of manipulability of the PS rule under different combinations of the number of agents, objects, and utility functions.

[1]  Felix Brandt,et al.  On Popular Random Assignments , 2013, SAGT.

[2]  Daniela Sabán,et al.  House allocation with indifferences: a generalization and a unified view , 2013, ACM Conference on Economics and Computation.

[3]  Ramaswamy Chandrasekaran,et al.  A Class of Sequential Games , 1971, Oper. Res..

[4]  Piotr Faliszewski,et al.  Using complexity to protect elections , 2010, Commun. ACM.

[5]  Lionel Levine,et al.  How to Make the Most of a Shared Meal: Plan the Last Bite First , 2011, Am. Math. Mon..

[6]  Hervé Moulin,et al.  A New Solution to the Random Assignment Problem , 2001, J. Econ. Theory.

[7]  Özgün Ekici,et al.  An equilibrium analysis of the probabilistic serial mechanism , 2016, Int. J. Game Theory.

[8]  D. Black On the Rationale of Group Decision-making , 1948, Journal of Political Economy.

[9]  R. Zeckhauser,et al.  The Efficient Allocation of Individuals to Positions , 1979, Journal of Political Economy.

[10]  W. Cho Probabilistic Assignment : A Two-fold Axiomatic Approach , 2012 .

[11]  Eun Jeong Heo,et al.  Probabilistic Assignment of Objects: Characterizing the Serial Rule , 2011, J. Econ. Theory.

[12]  Felix Brandt,et al.  The Computational Complexity of Random Serial Dictatorship , 2013, WINE.

[13]  Jay Sethuraman,et al.  A solution to the random assignment problem on the full preference domain , 2006, J. Econ. Theory.

[14]  Fuhito Kojima,et al.  Random assignment of multiple indivisible objects , 2009, Math. Soc. Sci..

[15]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Designing Random Allocation Mechanisms: Theory and Applications , 2013 .

[16]  Piotr Faliszewski,et al.  AI's War on Manipulation: Are We Winning? , 2010, AI Mag..

[17]  J. Sethuraman,et al.  A note on object allocation under lexicographic preferences , 2014 .

[18]  Özgür Yilmaz,et al.  The probabilistic serial mechanism with private endowments , 2010, Games Econ. Behav..

[19]  Vijay V. Vazirani,et al.  Allocation of Divisible Goods Under Lexicographic Preferences , 2012, FSTTCS.

[20]  Jérôme Lang,et al.  A General Elicitation-Free Protocol for Allocating Indivisible Goods , 2011, IJCAI.

[21]  P. Gärdenfors Assignment Problem Based on Ordinal Preferences , 1973 .

[22]  Morimitsu Kurino,et al.  Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin Für Sozialforschung (wzb) Market Behavior an Experimental Study on the Incentives of the Probabilistic Serial Mechanism an Experimental Study on the Incentives of the Probabilistic Serial Mechanism , 2022 .

[23]  Vahab S. Mirrokni,et al.  Uncoordinated Two-Sided Matching Markets , 2011, SIAM J. Comput..