Ecuadorian Cancer Patients’ Preference for Information and Communication Technologies: Cross-Sectional Study

Background The instantaneous spread of information, low costs, and broad availability of information and communication technologies (ICTs) make them an attractive platform for managing care, patient communication, and medical interventions in cancer treatment. There is little information available in Latin America about the level of usage of ICTs for and by cancer patients. Our study attempts to fill this gap. Objective The aim of this study was to assess the level of ICT use and patterns of preferences among cancer patients. Methods We conducted an anonymous cross-sectional survey study in 500 Ecuadorian cancer patients. This questionnaire consisted of 22 items about demographic and clinical data, together with the preferences of people who use ICTs. Chi-square, crude, and adjusted logistic regressions were performed. Results Of the total, 43.2% (216/500) of participants reported that they had access to the Internet, and 25.4% (127/500) reported that they neither owned a cell phone nor did they have access to the Internet. The Internet constituted the highest usage rate as a source of information about malignant diseases (74.3%, 162/218) regardless of age (P<.001). With regard to the preferences on how patients would like to use ICTs to receive information about diseases, WhatsApp (66.5%, 145/218) and short message service (SMS) text messaging (61.0%, 133/218) were widely reported as interesting communication channels. Similarly, WhatsApp (72.0%, 157/218) followed by SMS (63.8%, 139/218) were reported as the preferred ICTs through which patients would like to ask physicians about diseases. Adjusted regression analysis showed that patients aged between 40 and 64 years were more likely to be interested in receiving information through SMS (odds ratio, OR 5.09, 95% CI 1.92-13.32), as well as for asking questions to physicians through this same media (OR 9.78, CI 3.45-27.67) than the oldest group. Conclusions WhatsApp, SMS, and email are effective and widely used ICTs that can promote communication between cancer patients and physicians. According to age range, new ICTs such as Facebook are still emerging. Future studies should investigate how to develop and promote ICT-based resources more effectively to engage the outcomes of cancer patients. The widespread use of ICTs narrows the gap between cancer patients with restricted socioeconomic conditions and those with wealth and easily available technological means, thereby opening up new possibilities in low-income countries.

[1]  Information Needs of Cancer Patients and Perception of Impact of the Disease, of Self-Efficacy, and Locus of Control , 2016, Journal of Cancer Education.

[2]  Bora Kim,et al.  The Experience of Young Adult Cancer Patients Described Through Online Narratives , 2013, Cancer nursing.

[3]  C. P. Cooper,et al.  Gynecologic Cancer Information on YouTube: Will Women Watch Advertisements to Learn More? , 2016, Journal of Cancer Education.

[4]  Samantha A. Adams,et al.  Revisiting the online health information reliability debate in the wake of "web 2.0": An inter-disciplinary literature and website review , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[5]  Samantha A. Adams,et al.  Blog-based applications and health information: Two case studies that illustrate important questions for Consumer Health Informatics (CHI) research , 2010, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[6]  T. Suominen,et al.  Motives of cancer patients for using the Internet to seek social support. , 2013, European journal of cancer care.

[7]  Aaron Smith,et al.  U.S. Smartphone Use in 2015 , 2015 .

[8]  M. Chun,et al.  Social Media Use for Cancer Education at a Community-Based Cancer Center in South Korea , 2018, Journal of Cancer Education.

[9]  Pamela Whitten,et al.  Comparison of Social Support Content Within Online Communities for High- and Low-Survival-Rate Cancers , 2011, Computers, informatics, nursing : CIN.

[10]  A. Sperber Translation and validation of study instruments for cross-cultural research. , 2004, Gastroenterology.

[11]  S. Coughlin,et al.  Towards research-tested smartphone applications for preventing breast cancer. , 2016, mHealth.

[12]  Sujin Kim,et al.  Content analysis of cancer blog posts. , 2009, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[13]  J. Carroll,et al.  A New Dimension of Health Care: Systematic Review of the Uses, Benefits, and Limitations of Social Media for Health Communication , 2013, Journal of medical Internet research.

[14]  Jeong Yeob Han,et al.  How Does Insightful and Emotional Disclosure Bring Potential Health Benefits?: Study Based on Online Support Groups for Women with Breast Cancer. , 2011, The Journal of communication.

[15]  A. Pandey,et al.  YouTube as a source of information on dialysis: A content analysis , 2015, Nephrology.

[16]  Wanda Pratt,et al.  Threading Together Patient Expertise , 2007, AMIA.

[17]  Mireia Fernández-Ardèvol,et al.  Beyond WhatsApp: Older people and smartphones , 2016 .

[18]  Sam Nordfeldt,et al.  Patient and Parent Views on a Web 2.0 Diabetes Portal—the Management Tool, the Generator, and the Gatekeeper: Qualitative Study , 2010, Journal of medical Internet research.

[19]  P. Whitten,et al.  The Differential Effects of Social Media Sites for Promoting Cancer Risk Reduction , 2016, Journal of Cancer Education.

[20]  E. Akl,et al.  Social Media Use for Public Health Campaigning in a Low Resource Setting: The Case of Waterpipe Tobacco Smoking , 2015, BioMed research international.

[21]  B. Suh,et al.  The Source and Credibility of Colorectal Cancer Information on Twitter , 2016, Medicine.

[22]  M. Mars,et al.  The promise of digital (mobile) health in cancer prevention and treatment. , 2013, Future oncology.

[23]  Jon Margerum-Leys,et al.  Information and Communication Technologies in Social Work. , 2010, Advances in Social Work.

[24]  T. Fairley,et al.  Getting Beyond Impressions: An Evaluation of Engagement with Breast Cancer-related Facebook Content. , 2016, mHealth.

[25]  W. Kaplan,et al.  Globalization and Health BioMed Central Debate , 2006 .

[26]  Alan P Baptist,et al.  Social Media, Text Messaging, and Email—Preferences of Asthma Patients between 12 and 40 Years Old , 2011, The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma.

[27]  D. Capurro,et al.  The Use of Social Networking Sites for Public Health Practice and Research: A Systematic Review , 2014, Journal of medical Internet research.

[28]  Jane Austin,et al.  Peer mentoring and survivors' stories for cancer patients: positive effects and some cautionary notes. , 2006, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  K. Viswanath,et al.  Are socioeconomic disparities in health behavior mediated by differential media use? Test of the communication inequality theory. , 2016, Patient education and counseling.