Decision Flexibility vs. Information accuracy in Energy-Intensive Businesses

Demand-side management and demand response are integral building blocks for environmental sustainability. Exchange-based power pricing serves as an economic mechanism to set incentives to shift demand to periods where prices are low. Low power prices also serve as an indicator for green(er) power, since high feed-ins from variable renewable sources push the electricity price downward. Thus, businesses contribute not only to economic but also environmental sustainability minimizing electricity costs. Hence, especially energy-intensive businesses can become greener and more competitive by integrating volatile electricity prices into their production planning activities. In this paper, we demonstrate that the length of the planning horizons is key to achieve more sustainable outcomes due to a trade-off between decision flexibility and information accuracy. Decision flexibility – i.e. the capability to shift processes – increases with longer planning horizons. Information accuracy – i.e. price accuracy – increases with shorter planning horizons. Information Systems (IS) can help to balance this trade-off. We follow a data-driven approach and derive both actual and predicted electricity spot prices from historic electricity intraday market data in Germany. We find that decision flexibility and information accuracy affect the planning horizon as conceived. First results indicate that more sustainable outcomes are achieved with longer planning horizons.

[1]  James L. Dodd,et al.  Economic Value Added (EVA Super TM): An Empirical Examination of a New Corporate Performance Measure , 1997 .

[2]  Hans Kellerer,et al.  Knapsack problems , 2004 .

[3]  Lukas Häfner,et al.  Providing Utility to Utilities: The Value of Information Systems Enabled Flexibility in Electricity Consumption , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Christos D. Tarantilis,et al.  Energy-aware decision support for production scheduling , 2017, Decis. Support Syst..

[5]  Mohammed H. Albadi,et al.  A summary of demand response in electricity markets , 2008 .

[6]  M. Ierapetritou,et al.  Cost Minimization in an Energy-Intensive Plant Using Mathematical Programming Approaches , 2002 .

[7]  J. Meredith,et al.  Alternative research paradigms in operations , 1989 .

[8]  C. Fitzpatrick,et al.  Demand side management of industrial electricity consumption: Promoting the use of renewable energy through real-time pricing , 2014 .

[9]  Pedro M. Castro,et al.  Scope for industrial applications of production scheduling models and solution methods , 2014, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[10]  Richard T. Watson,et al.  Information Systems and Environmentally Sustainable Development: Energy Informatics and New Directions for the IS Community , 2010, MIS Q..

[11]  H. Simon Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations , 1978 .

[12]  Stefan Feuerriegel,et al.  Reducing Price Uncertainty through Demand Side Management , 2012, ICIS.

[13]  Esther M. Arkin,et al.  Scheduling jobs with fixed start and end times , 1987, Discret. Appl. Math..

[14]  Qi Zhang,et al.  Risk-based integrated production scheduling and electricity procurement for continuous power-intensive processes , 2016, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[15]  Wankeun Oh,et al.  Determinants of innovation in energy intensive industry and implications for energy policy , 2015 .

[16]  Florian Moser,et al.  Evaluating Different IT Innovation Investment Strategies from an Ex Ante and Ex Post Evaluation Perspective , 2016 .

[17]  Ronald Huisman,et al.  Electricity Futures Prices: Indirect Storability, Expectations, and Risk Premiums ☆ , 2012 .

[18]  Lennart Merkert,et al.  Integrating Energy Optimization and Production Scheduling in Energy-Intensive Industries , 2017 .

[19]  Arnaud Fréville,et al.  The multidimensional 0-1 knapsack problem: An overview , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[20]  Jinxing Xie,et al.  Impact of forecasting error on the performance of capacitated multi-item production systems , 2004, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[21]  Erik Haugom,et al.  Market efficiency and risk premia in short-term forward prices , 2012 .

[22]  Abidin Kaya,et al.  Time-based electricity pricing for large-volume customers: A comparison of two buildings under tariff alternatives , 2015 .

[23]  Klaus Neumann,et al.  Operations research , 1993 .

[24]  Ashwani Kumar,et al.  Short term price forecasting in deregulated electricity markets: A review of statistical models and key issues , 2009 .

[25]  E. Fama,et al.  Commodity futures prices: some evidence on forecast power , 1987 .

[26]  Lion Hirth,et al.  The effect of solar wind power variability on their relative price , 2013 .

[27]  M. Merkhofer The Value of Information Given Decision Flexibility , 1977 .

[28]  B. Beamon Supply chain design and analysis:: Models and methods , 1998 .

[29]  Ian Miguel,et al.  The Temporal Knapsack Problem and Its Solution , 2005, CPAIOR.

[30]  S. Feuerriegel,et al.  Measuring the Financial Impact of Demand Response for Electricity Retailers , 2013 .

[31]  A. Isaksson,et al.  Scheduling and energy - Industrial challenges and opportunities , 2015, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[32]  Ignacio E. Grossmann,et al.  Planning and Scheduling for Industrial Demand Side Management: Advances and Challenges , 2016 .

[33]  An Empirical Study of the Information Premium on Electricity Markets , 2013 .

[34]  Rym M'Hallah,et al.  A binary multiple knapsack model for single machine scheduling with machine unavailability , 2016, Comput. Oper. Res..