Relational Agents Improve Engagement and Learning in Science Museum Visitors

A virtual museum guide agent that uses human relationship-building behaviors to engage museum visitors is described. The agent, named "Tinker", appears in the form of a human-sized anthropomorphic robot, and uses nonverbal conversational behavior, empathy, social dialogue, reciprocal self-disclosure and other relational behavior to establish social bonds with users. Tinker can describe exhibits in the museum, give directions, and discuss technical aspects of her own implementation. Results from an experiment involving 1,607 visitors indicate that the use of relational behavior leads to significantly greater engagement by museum visitors, measured by session length, number of sessions, and selfreported attitude, as well as learning gains, as measured by a knowledge test, compared to the same agent that did not use relational behavior. Implications for museum exhibits and intelligent tutoring systems are discussed.

[1]  Justine Cassell,et al.  BEAT: the Behavior Expression Animation Toolkit , 2001, Life-like characters.

[2]  J. Laver,et al.  Linguistic Routines and Politeness in Greeting and Parting , 1981 .

[3]  Jeremy N. Bailenson,et al.  A meta-analysis of the impact of the inclusion and realism of human-like faces on user experiences in interfaces , 2007, CHI.

[4]  W. Hartup,et al.  The Company They Keep: Friendship in Childhood and Adolescence. , 1996 .

[5]  Andrew Christensen,et al.  Predicting marital satisfaction from behavior: Do all roads really lead to Rome? , 1999 .

[6]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  A Conversational Agent as Museum Guide - Design and Evaluation of a Real-World Application , 2005, IVA.

[7]  Timothy W. Bickmore,et al.  Public displays of affect: deploying relational agents in public spaces , 2008, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[8]  James C. Lester,et al.  Life-Like Pedagogical Agents in Constructivist Multimedia Environments: Cognitive Consequences of their Interaction , 2000 .

[9]  W. Lewis Johnson,et al.  Artificial intelligence in education : AI-ED in the wired and wireless future , 2001 .

[10]  Timothy W. Bickmore,et al.  'It's just like you talk to a friend' relational agents for older adults , 2005, Interact. Comput..

[11]  J. Cassell,et al.  Embodied conversational agents , 2000 .

[12]  Stephanie Rosenthal,et al.  Designing robots for long-term social interaction , 2005, 2005 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[13]  Timothy W. Bickmore,et al.  The identification of users by relational agents , 2008, AAMAS.

[14]  Susanne van Mulken,et al.  The impact of animated interface agents: a review of empirical research , 2000, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[15]  James C. Lester,et al.  Cosmo-a life-like animated agent with deictic believability , 1997 .

[16]  James J. Bradac,et al.  A Lay Theory of Relational Satisfaction with Best Friends , 1996 .

[17]  William Damon,et al.  Strategic uses of peer learning in children's education. , 1989 .

[18]  Barbara F. Okun.  Effective Helping: Interviewing and Counseling Techniques , 1976 .

[19]  Anton Leuski,et al.  Ada and Grace: Toward Realistic and Engaging Virtual Museum Guides , 2010, IVA.

[20]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  AutoTutor: A simulation of a human tutor , 1999, Cognitive Systems Research.

[21]  James C. Lester,et al.  Lifelike Pedagogical Agents for Mixed-initiative Problem Solving in Constructivist Learning Environments , 2004, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[22]  Timothy W. Bickmore,et al.  Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships , 2005, TCHI.

[23]  Takayuki Kanda,et al.  Interactive Humanoid Robots for a Science Museum , 2007, IEEE Intell. Syst..

[24]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Charles J. Gelso,et al.  The Psychotherapy Relationship: Theory, Research, and Practice , 1998 .

[26]  R. Bollet,et al.  Personalizing E-Learning , 2002 .

[27]  I. Altman,et al.  Social penetration: The development of interpersonal relationships , 1973 .

[28]  Charles B. Callaway,et al.  Cosmo: A Life-like Animated Pedagogical Agent with Deictic Believability (cid:3) , 1997 .

[29]  L. Havens,et al.  Making Contact: Uses of Language in Psychotherapy , 1986 .

[30]  J. Svennevig.  Getting acquainted in conversation , 1999 .

[31]  C. Sidney Burrus.  Connexions: An open educational resource for the 21st century , 2007 .

[32]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  Autotutor holds conversations with learners that are responsive to their cognitive and emotional states , 2007 .

[33]  G. Ladd,et al.  Peer relationships in child development. , 1989 .

[34]  G. Bente,et al.  Personalizing e-Learning. The Social Effects of Pedagogical Agents , 2010 .

[35]  S. West,et al.  A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[36]  Kathryn R. Wentzel,et al.  Social-motivational processes and interpersonal relationships: Implications for understanding motivation at school. , 1999 .