The Role of Magnetic Resonance Cholangio-Pancreaticography ( MRCP ) In Predicting Common Bile Duct Stone in Symptomatic Gall Stone Disease

Common bile duct stones may be discovered preoperatively, intra-operatively or postoperatively. The standard preoperative workup for patients presenting with symptoms attributable to choledocholithiasis includes liver function test and an abdominal ultrasound. These tests, combined with clinical examination and history, constitute the entire workup for most patients. As there is no exactly known preventive measures, early detection and treatment is the most justifiable intervention to reduce mortality and morbidity. With the advancement of medical sciences many newer techniques are coming up for detection of biliary tract diseases. Among the imaging techniques currently advocated for evaluating the biliary tree, ultrasonography is most frequently used in the initial evaluation of patients with symptoms and sign referral to the pancreato-biliary systems. Magnetic resonance cholangio-pancreatography (MRCP) is a non-invasive imaging test with excellent overall sensitivity and specificity for demonstrating the level and presence of biliary obstruction. MRCP has emerged as an accurate, non invasive diagnostic modality for investigating the biliary and pancreatic duct and has been recommended in some circles as the preoperative procedure of choice for the detection of CBD stones.

[1]  D. Lomanto,et al.  Laparoscopic Treatment of Gallbladder and Common Bile Duct Stones: A Prospective Study , 1996, World Journal of Surgery.

[2]  H. Wong,et al.  Preoperative MRCP to detect choledocholithiasis in acute calculous cholecystitis , 2011, Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences.

[3]  U. Sundaram,et al.  Correlation between MRCP and ERCP findings at a tertiary care hospital. , 2010, The West Virginia medical journal.

[4]  E. Iannicelli,et al.  [Role of MR cholangiopancreatography in the evaluation of biliary disease]. , 2006, La Clinica terapeutica.

[5]  L. del Viscovo,et al.  Efficacy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in detecting common bile duct lithiasis: our experience. , 2005, Chirurgia italiana.

[6]  C. Schulman,et al.  Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography accurately detects common bile duct stones in resolving gallstone pancreatitis. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[7]  김응국 Laparoscopic Treatment of Common Bile Duct Stones , 2005 .

[8]  R. Edlich,et al.  Cholelithiasis and cholecystitis. , 2005, Journal of long-term effects of medical implants.

[9]  A. Hill,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging of the common bile duct to exclude choledocholithiasis , 2004, ANZ journal of surgery.

[10]  G. Maddern,et al.  Is laparoscopic intraoperative cholangiogram a matter of routine? , 2004, American journal of surgery.

[11]  John V. White,et al.  Gallstones and laparoscopic cholecystectomy , 1993, Surgical Endoscopy.

[12]  S. Fieuws,et al.  The value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in predicting common bile duct stones in patients with gallstone disease , 2003, The British journal of surgery.

[13]  F. Falaschi,et al.  Detection of common bile duct stones before laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Evaluation with MR cholangiography , 2002 .

[14]  Myeong-Jin Kim,et al.  MR cholangiography in symptomatic gallstones: diagnostic accuracy according to clinical risk group. , 2002, Radiology.

[15]  Paul V. Desmond,et al.  Prospective assessment of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for noninvasive imaging of the biliary tree. , 2002, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[16]  S. Islam,et al.  Effectiveness and long–term results of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration , 2002, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[17]  J. Soto,et al.  Diagnosing bile duct stones: comparison of unenhanced helical CT, oral contrast-enhanced CT cholangiography, and MR cholangiography. , 2000, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  I. Muir,et al.  Prospective analysis of a scoring system to predict choledocholithiasis , 2000, The British journal of surgery.

[19]  D. Lindsell The diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) and ultrasound compared with direct cholangiography in the detection of choledocholithiasis. , 2000, Clinical radiology.

[20]  D. Roubicek,et al.  [Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparative study with direct cholangiography]. , 2000, Acta gastroenterologica Latinoamericana.

[21]  A. Fulcher,et al.  Benign diseases of the biliary tract: evaluation with MR cholangiography. , 1999, Seminars in ultrasound, CT, and MR.

[22]  F. Prat,et al.  Prediction of common bile duct stones by noninvasive tests. , 1999, Annals of surgery.

[23]  A. Barkun,et al.  Choledocholithiasis: evaluation of MR cholangiography for diagnosis. , 1998, Radiology.

[24]  S. Hochwald,et al.  Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography accurately predicts the presence or absence of choledocholithiasis , 1998, Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.

[25]  Sankey V. Williams,et al.  Predictors of common bile duct stones prior to cholecystectomy: a meta-analysis. , 1996, Gastrointestinal endoscopy.

[26]  C. Reinhold,et al.  Current status of MR cholangiopancreatography. , 1996, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  G. Fried,et al.  Useful Predictors of Bile Duct Stones in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy , 1994, Annals of surgery.

[28]  K. Zucker,et al.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review of 12,397 patients. , 1992, Surgical laparoscopy & endoscopy.

[29]  K. Zucker,et al.  Laparoscopie Cholangiography: Results and Indications , 1992, Annals of surgery.

[30]  E. Faragher,et al.  Endoscopic sphincterotomy: The whole truth , 1991, The British journal of surgery.