Assessing changes in watershed flow regimes with spatially explicit hydraulic models

: Urbanization, farming, and other watershed activities can significantly alter storm hydrographs and sediment erosion rates within a watershed. These changes routinely cause severe economic and ecological problems manifested in the form of increased flooding and significant changes in channel morphology. As the activities within a watershed influence the hydrologic, hydraulic, and ecological conditions within a river, interdisciplinary approaches to predict and assess the impacts that different land uses have on streams need to be developed. An important component of this process is ascertaining how hydrologic changes induced by specific watershed activities will affect hydraulic conditions and the accompanying flood levels, sediment transport rates, and habitat conditions within a stream. A conceptual model for using spatially explicit (two-dimensional) hydraulic models to help evaluate the impacts that changes in flow regime might have on a river is presented. This framework proposes that reproducing and quantifying flow complexity allows one to compare the hydraulic conditions within urban, urbanizing, and non-urban streams in a more biologically and economically meaningful way. The justification, advantage, and need for such a method is argued through the results of one- and two-dimensional hydraulic model studies. The implementation of this methodology in watershed urbanization studies is described.

[1]  Ken D. Bovee,et al.  The incremental method of assessing habitat potential for coolwater species, with management implications , 1978 .

[2]  C. S. Shirvell.  Ability of phabsim to predict chinook salmon spawning habitat , 1989 .

[3]  Thomas B. Hardy,et al.  The future of habitat modeling and instream flow assessment techniques , 1998 .

[4]  Panayiotis Diplas,et al.  Using two-dimensional hydrodynamic models at scales of ecological importance , 2000 .

[5]  Peter M. Steffler,et al.  TWO‐DIMENSIONAL HYDRAULIC SIMULATION OF PHYSICAL HABITAT CONDITIONS IN FLOWING STREAMS , 1996 .

[6]  M. Leclerc,et al.  Two‐Dimensional Hydrodynamic Modeling: A Neglected Tool in the Instream Flow Incremental Methodology , 1995 .

[7]  J. Smith,et al.  Sand Deposition in the Colorado River in the Grand Canyon from Flooding of the Little Colorado River , 1996 .

[8]  R. J. White,et al.  Competition Between Brook Trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and Brown Trout (Salmo trutta) for Positions in a Michigan Stream , 1981 .

[9]  G. Hollis.  The Effect of Urbanization on Floods of Different Recurrence Interval , 1975 .

[10]  B. Biggs,et al.  Relationships between benthic biota and hydrological indices in New Zealand streams , 1997 .

[11]  P. Bates,et al.  Modelling suspended sediment deposition on a fluvial floodplain using a two-dimensional dynamic finite element model , 2000 .

[12]  Ian Maddock,et al.  The Importance of Physical Habitat Assessment for Evaluating River Health , 1999 .

[13]  B. Mech.,et al.  River Width Adjustment. II: Modeling , 1998 .

[14]  Panayiotis Diplas,et al.  Evaluating spatially explicit metrics of stream energy gradients using hydrodynamic model simulations , 2000 .