There has been a recent trend towards an all-IP network as it provides for cost-savings together with optimized network and ease of use. Owing to explosive growth of wireless users and growing demand of wireless services, the internet body IETF has developed mobility management schemes to enhance IPv6 in mobility scenarios for wireless subscribers. These IPv6-based mobility management schemes adversely affect the performance of transport protocols during handoff. In this paper, the performance of video transmission over MIPv6 and recent MIPv6 enhancements, namely, FMIPv6, HMIPv6, and FHMIPv6 is compared. We consider the impact of different parameters like degree of mobility, wired link delay, jitter, error rate, and throughput. Due to the complexity of the required study, simulation is chosen as the most suitable analysis method. The results in this paper are based on simulation experiments performed within the ns network simulator. The simulation environment allows us also to investigate the behavior of the protocol in many cases, e.g., under channel saturation conditions, and considering different traffic sources: CBR, Video, VoIP and TCP.
[1]
S. Nandi,et al.
Simulation-based performance comparison of TCP-variants over Mobile IPv6-based mobility management schemes
,
2004,
29th Annual IEEE International Conference on Local Computer Networks.
[2]
Charles E. Perkins,et al.
Fast handovers and context transfers in mobile networks
,
2001,
CCRV.
[3]
Claude Castelluccia,et al.
Hierarchical MIPv6 mobility management
,
2000
.
[4]
Charles E. Perkins,et al.
Mobility support in IPv6
,
1996,
MobiCom '96.
[5]
Charles E. Perkins,et al.
IP Mobility Support
,
1996,
RFC.