Vorapaxar in the secondary prevention of atherothrombotic events.
暂无分享,去创建一个
Marc P. Bonaca | E. Braunwald | D. Morrow | S. Murphy | B. Scirica | K. Fox | P. Théroux | J. Nicolau | S. Wiviott | S. Ameriso | L. Lipka | Xuan Liu | J. Špinar | J. Strony | A. Dalby | M. Fish | A. O. Ophuis | E. Paolasso | P. Théroux
[1] Giuseppe Ambrosio,et al. Thrombin-receptor antagonist vorapaxar in acute coronary syndromes. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.
[2] E. Antman,et al. Efficacy and safety of intensive antiplatelet therapy with prasugrel from TRITON-TIMI 38 in a core clinical cohort defined by worldwide regulatory agencies. , 2011, The American journal of cardiology.
[3] Deepak L. Bhatt,et al. Safety and Tolerability of Atopaxar in the Treatment of Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: The Lessons From Antagonizing the Cellular Effects of Thrombin–Acute Coronary Syndromes Trial , 2011, Circulation.
[4] Deepak L. Bhatt,et al. Randomized Trial of Atopaxar in the Treatment of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: The Lessons From Antagonizing the Cellular Effect of Thrombin–Coronary Artery Disease Trial , 2011, Circulation.
[5] Y. Ikeda,et al. Safety and exploratory efficacy of the novel thrombin receptor (PAR-1) antagonist SCH530348 for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. , 2010, Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis.
[6] Claes Held,et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.
[7] Marc P. Bonaca,et al. Evaluation of a novel antiplatelet agent for secondary prevention in patients with a history of atherosclerotic disease: design and rationale for the Thrombin-Receptor Antagonist in Secondary Prevention of Atherothrombotic Ischemic Events (TRA 2 degrees P)-TIMI 50 trial. , 2009, American heart journal.
[8] K. Mahaffey,et al. Safety and tolerability of SCH 530348 in patients undergoing non-urgent percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II study , 2009, The Lancet.
[9] Vivian Gu,et al. Aspirin and extended-release dipyridamole versus clopidogrel for recurrent stroke. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.
[10] E. Antman,et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.
[11] Deepak L. Bhatt,et al. Patients with prior myocardial infarction, stroke, or symptomatic peripheral arterial disease in the CHARISMA trial. , 2007, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[12] A. Leger,et al. Protease-Activated Receptors in Cardiovascular Diseases , 2006, Circulation.
[13] S. Chackalamannil. Thrombin receptor (protease activated receptor-1) antagonists as potent antithrombotic agents with strong antiplatelet effects. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[14] Patrice Cacoub,et al. Clopidogrel and aspirin versus aspirin alone for the prevention of atherothrombotic events. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.
[15] W. Greenlee,et al. Discovery of potent orally active thrombin receptor (protease activated receptor 1) antagonists as novel antithrombotic agents. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.
[16] H. Diener,et al. Aspirin and clopidogrel compared with clopidogrel alone after recent ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack in high-risk patients (MATCH): randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial , 2004, The Lancet.
[17] P. R. R. Ecurrent,et al. EFFECTS OF CLOPIDOGREL IN ADDITION TO ASPIRIN IN PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES WITHOUT ST-SEGMENT ELEVATION , 2001 .
[18] S. Coughlin,et al. Thrombin signalling and protease-activated receptors , 2000, Nature.