Hierarchical Bayesian modeling of intertemporal choice

There is a growing interest in studying individual differences in choices that involve trading off reward amount and delay to delivery because such choices have been linked to involvement in risky behaviors, such as substance abuse. The most ubiquitous proposal in psychology is to model these choices assuming delayed rewards lose value following a hyperbolic function, which has one free parameter, named discounting rate. Consequently, a fundamental issue is the estimation of this parameter. The traditional approach estimates each individual's discounting rate separately, which discards individual differences during modeling and ignores the statistical structure of the population. The present work adopted a different approximation to parameter estimation: each individual's discounting rate is estimated considering the information provided by all subjects, using state-of-the-art Bayesian inference techniques. Our goal was to evaluate whether individual discounting rates come from one or more subpopulations, using Mazur's (1987) hyperbolic function. Twelve hundred eighty-four subjects answered the Intertemporal Choice Task developed by Kirby, Petry and Bickel (1999). The modeling techniques employed permitted the identification of subjects who produced random, careless responses, and who were discarded from further analysis. Results showed that one-mixture hierarchical distribution that uses the information provided by all subjects suffices to model individual differences in delay discounting, suggesting psychological variability resides along a continuum rather than in discrete clusters. This different approach to parameter estimation has the potential to contribute to the understanding and prediction of decision making in various real-world situations where immediacy is constantly in conflict with magnitude.

[1]  L. Green,et al.  Rate of temporal discounting decreases with amount of reward , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[2]  J. E. Mazur An adjusting procedure for studying delayed reinforcement. , 1987 .

[3]  Fiona Steele,et al.  Analysis of Multivariate Social Science Data, Second Edition , 2008 .

[4]  D. Read,et al.  The Psychology of Intertemporal Tradeoffs , 2009, Psychological review.

[5]  Charles Sprenger,et al.  Estimating Time Preferences from Convex Budgets , 2010 .

[6]  M. Lee Three case studies in the Bayesian analysis of cognitive models , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[7]  Matthew D. Zeigenfuse,et al.  A general latent assignment approach for modeling psychological contaminants , 2010 .

[8]  Daniel Read,et al.  Weighing Outcomes by Time or Against Time? Evaluation Rules in Intertemporal Choice , 2014, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  K. Kirby One-year temporal stability of delay-discount rates , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[10]  A. Odum,et al.  Impulsivity and cigarette smoking: delay discounting in current, never, and ex-smokers , 1999, Psychopharmacology.

[11]  E. Wagenmakers,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation for cumulative prospect theory , 2011, Journal of Mathematical Psychology.

[12]  J. Busemeyer,et al.  A probabilistic, dynamic, and attribute-wise model of intertemporal choice. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[13]  D. Rubin,et al.  Inference from Iterative Simulation Using Multiple Sequences , 1992 .

[14]  Joel Myerson,et al.  Discounting of delayed rewards: (A)theoretical interpretation of the Kirby questionnaire , 2014, Behavioural Processes.

[15]  G. Badger,et al.  Delay discounting predicts postpartum relapse to cigarette smoking among pregnant women. , 2007, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[16]  W. Bickel,et al.  Heroin addicts have higher discount rates for delayed rewards than non-drug-using controls. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  Martyn Plummer,et al.  JAGS: A program for analysis of Bayesian graphical models using Gibbs sampling , 2003 .

[18]  Bethany R Raiff,et al.  Delay discounting of potentially real and hypothetical rewards: II. Between- and within-subject comparisons. , 2004, Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology.

[19]  Claudia González-Vallejo,et al.  Attribute-wise vs. alternative-wise mechanism in intertemporal choice: Testing the proportional difference, trade-off, and hyperbolic models. , 2016 .

[20]  Michael D. Lee,et al.  Bayesian Methods in Cognitive Modeling , 2016 .

[21]  Shanefrederick,et al.  Time Discounting and Time Preference : A Critical Review , 2022 .

[22]  G. Ainslie Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. , 1975, Psychological bulletin.

[23]  L. Green,et al.  Discounting of Delayed Rewards: A Life-Span Comparison , 1994 .

[24]  Jesse Dallery,et al.  Delay discounting predicts cigarette smoking in a laboratory model of abstinence reinforcement , 2007, Psychopharmacology.

[25]  P. Killeen An additive-utility model of delay discounting. , 2009, Psychological review.

[26]  Samuel J. Gershman,et al.  A Tutorial on Bayesian Nonparametric Models , 2011, 1106.2697.

[27]  N. Petry,et al.  Delay discounting of money and alcohol in actively using alcoholics, currently abstinent alcoholics, and controls , 2001, Psychopharmacology.

[28]  Benjamin T Vincent,et al.  Hierarchical Bayesian estimation and hypothesis testing for delay discounting tasks , 2015, Behavior Research Methods.