Predicting the Occurrence of Endangered Species in Fragmented Landscapes

Reliable prediction of metapopulation persistence in fragmented landscapes has become a priority in conservation biology, with ongoing destruction of habitat confining increasing numbers of species into networks of small patches. A spatially realistic metapopulation model, which includes the first-order effects of patch area and isolation on extinction and colonization, has been tested. The distribution of an endangered butterfly was successfully predicted on the basis of parameter values estimated for a well-studied congeneric species. This modeling approach can be a practical tool in the study and conservation of species in highly fragmented landscapes.

[1]  I. Hanski,et al.  Patch-occupancy dynamics in fragmented landscapes. , 1994, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[2]  C. Thomas,et al.  Testing a Metapopulation Model of Coexistence in the Insect Community on Ragwort (Senecio jacobaea) , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[3]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  The Quantitative Incidence Function Model and Persistence of an Endangered Butterfly Metapopulation , 1996 .

[4]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Single-Species Spatial Dynamics May Contribute to Long-Term Rarity and Commonness , 1985 .

[5]  Mats Gyllenberg,et al.  Minimum Viable Metapopulation Size , 1996, The American Naturalist.

[6]  W. Wilson,et al.  Spatial Instabilities within the Diffusive Lotka-Volterra System: Individual-Based Simulation Results , 1993 .

[7]  M. Gilpin,et al.  Metapopulation Biology: Ecology, Genetics, and Evolution , 1997 .

[8]  Per Sjogren Gulve Distribution and Extinction Patterns within a Northern Metapopulation of the Pool Frog, Rana Lessonae , 1994 .

[9]  W. J. Cromartie The Effect of Stand Size and Vegetational Background on the Colonization of Cruciferous Plants by Herbivorous Insects , 1975 .

[10]  C. Thomas,et al.  Spatial dynamics of a patchily distributed butterfly species , 1992 .

[11]  R. Brandl,et al.  Ecological and genetic spatial patterns of Urophora cardui (Diptera: Tephritidae) as evidence for population structure and biogeographical processes , 1994 .

[12]  I. Hanski A Practical Model of Metapopulation Dynamics , 1994 .

[13]  Andrew T. Smith THE DISTRIBUTION AND DISPERSAL OF PIKAS: CONSEQUENCES OF INSULAR POPULATION STRUCTURE' , 1974 .

[14]  M. Macgarvin Species-Area Relationships of Insects on Host Plants: Herbivores on Rosebay Willowherb , 1982 .

[15]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Metapopulation persistence of an endangered butterfly in a fragmented landscape , 1995 .

[16]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Multiple equilibria in metapopulation dynamics , 1995, Nature.

[17]  Ilkka Hanski,et al.  Metapopulation dynamics and conservation: A spatially explicit model applied to butterflies , 1994 .

[18]  A. Hastings,et al.  Metapopulation Dynamics and Genetics , 1994 .

[19]  Michael P. Hassell,et al.  Spatial structure and chaos in insect population dynamics , 1991, Nature.

[20]  H. Wolda,et al.  DIVERSITY OF INSECT FAUNAS , 1977 .

[21]  Chris D. Thomas,et al.  Partial recovery of a skipper butterfly (Hesperia comma) from population refuges : lessons for conservation in a fragmented landscape , 1993 .

[22]  Robert M. May,et al.  The spatial dynamics of host-parasitoid systems , 1992 .

[23]  Paul Opdam,et al.  European Nuthatch Metapopulations in a Fragmented Agricultural Landscape , 1991 .

[24]  Andrew T. Smith Temporal Changes in Insular Populations of the Pika (Ochotona Princeps) , 1980 .

[25]  Douglas W. Morris,et al.  Earth's peeling veneer of life , 1995, Nature.