Inversion-based data-driven time-space domain random noise attenuation method

Conventional time-space domain and frequency-space domain prediction filtering methods assume that seismic data consists of two parts, signal and random noise. That is, the so-called additive noise model. However, when estimating random noise, it is assumed that random noise can be predicted from the seismic data by convolving with a prediction error filter. That is, the source-noise model. Model inconsistencies, before and after denoising, compromise the noise attenuation and signal-preservation performances of prediction filtering methods. Therefore, this study presents an inversion-based time-space domain random noise attenuation method to overcome the model inconsistencies. In this method, a prediction error filter (PEF), is first estimated from seismic data; the filter characterizes the predictability of the seismic data and adaptively describes the seismic data’s space structure. After calculating PEF, it can be applied as a regularized constraint in the inversion process for seismic signal from noisy data. Unlike conventional random noise attenuation methods, the proposed method solves a seismic data inversion problem using regularization constraint; this overcomes the model inconsistency of the prediction filtering method. The proposed method was tested on both synthetic and real seismic data, and results from the prediction filtering method and the proposed method are compared. The testing demonstrated that the proposed method suppresses noise effectively and provides better signal-preservation performance.

[1]  Jon F. Claerbout,et al.  Interpolation with smoothly nonstationary prediction-error filters , 1999 .

[2]  M. Sacchi,et al.  Simultaneous seismic data denoising and reconstruction via multichannel singular spectrum analysis , 2011 .

[3]  Mauricio D. Sacchi,et al.  f-x adaptive seismic-trace interpolation , 2009 .

[4]  Mauricio D. Sacchi,et al.  Robust Reduced-Rank Seismic Denoising , 2013 .

[5]  Scott C. Hornbostel Spatial prediction filtering in the t-x and f-x domains , 1991 .

[6]  J. Claerbout,et al.  Lateral prediction for noise attenuation by t-x and f-x techniques , 1995 .

[7]  Wei Huang,et al.  Absorption decomposition and compensation via a two-step scheme , 2015 .

[8]  Robert Soubaras Signal-preserving Random Noise Attenuation By the F-x Projection , 1994 .

[9]  Michael K. Chase,et al.  Random noise reduction by 3‐D spatial prediction filtering , 1992 .

[10]  M. Sacchi,et al.  In situevidence for frequency dependence of near-surfaceQ , 2016 .

[11]  L. Canales Random Noise Reduction , 1984 .

[12]  Robert Soubaras 3D Projection Filtering For Noise Attenuation And Interpolation , 2000 .

[13]  Ning Liu,et al.  Adaptive prediction filtering in t-x-y domain for random noise attenuation using regularized nonstationary autoregression , 2015 .

[14]  Sanyi Yuan,et al.  Random noise reduction using Bayesian inversion , 2012 .

[15]  Walter I. Futterman,et al.  Dispersive body waves , 1962 .

[16]  Necati Gulunay,et al.  FXDECON and complex wiener prediction filter , 1986 .

[17]  Tad J. Ulrych,et al.  Application of singular value decomposition to vertical seismic profiling , 1988 .

[18]  C. Key Noncausal spatial prediction filtering based on an ARMA model , 2009 .

[19]  Hao Zheng,et al.  Tomographic inversion of near-surface Q factor by combining surface and cross-hole seismic surveys , 2016, Applied Geophysics.

[20]  Stewart Trickett,et al.  F-xy Cadzow Noise Suppression , 2008 .