The design of a vibrotactile seat for conveying take-over requests in automated driving

The driver of a conditionally automated car is not required to permanently monitor the outside environment, but needs to take over control whenever the automation issues a “request to intervene” (i.e., take-over request). If the driver misses the take-over request or does not respond in a timely and correct manner, a take-over could result in a safety-critical scenario. Traditionally, warnings in vehicles are conveyed by visual and auditory displays, though recently it has been argued that vibrotactile stimuli could also be a viable approach to present a take-over request to the driver. In this paper, we present a vibrotactile seat designed to convey dynamic vibration patterns to the driver. The seat incorporates 48 vibration motors (eccentric mass rotation) that can be individually controlled. One 6 × 4 matrix, with an average inter-motor distance of approximately 4 cm, is located in the seat back and one in the seat bottom. The DC-voltage to the motors is controlled by three Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) drivers, which in turn are controlled by an Arduino microcontroller. A study with 12 participants was conducted to investigate (1) at which vibration intensity participants find a vibratory stimulus annoying and whether this threshold changes over time, (2) how well participants are able to discriminate vibratory stimuli as a function of spatial separation, and (3) which of six dynamic vibration patterns are regarded as most satisfying. Results showed that participants’ annoyance threshold reduced when they were repeatedly exposed to vibrotactile stimuli. Second, the percentage of correct responses in the two-point discrimination test increased significantly with increasing inter-stimuli distance (i.e., from 4 to 20 cm). Third, participants seemed to be more satisfied when more motors were activated simultaneously (i.e., more spatial overlap). Overall, the results suggest that participants are well able to perceive vibrotractile stimuli in the driver seat. However, the results suggest that repetitive exposure to vibrotactile stimuli may evoke annoyance, a finding that should be taken into account in future designs of vibrotactile displays. Future studies should investigate the possibility to convey complex messages via the vibration seat.

[1]  F A GELDARD,et al.  Some neglected possibilities of communication. , 1960, Science.

[2]  Naohisa Hashimoto,et al.  Measurement of Driver's Reaction Time to Failure of Steering Controller during Automatic Driving , 2005 .

[3]  Yong Gu Ji,et al.  Haptic perceptions in the vehicle seat , 2011 .

[4]  Charles A. Green,et al.  Human Factors Issues Associated with Limited Ability Autonomous Driving Systems: Drivers’ Allocation of Visual Attention to the Forward Roadway , 2017 .

[5]  Jean-Michel Hoc,et al.  Objective and subjective evaluation of motor priming and warning systems applied to lateral control assistance. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Kathrin Zeeb,et al.  What determines the take-over time? An integrated model approach of driver take-over after automated driving. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Catherine M. Burns,et al.  Mapping Ecologically to Modalities , 2011 .

[8]  Alexander Toet,et al.  Uni-, bi- and tri-modal warning signals: effects of temporal parameters and sensory modality on perceived urgency , 2015 .

[9]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Haptic Gear Shifting Indication: Evaluating Acceptance and Potential Fuel Consumption Reduction , 2015 .

[10]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  The Out-of-the-Loop Performance Problem and Level of Control in Automation , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[11]  Thomas Maier,et al.  Driver Support by a Vibrotactile Seat Matrix – Recognition, Adequacy and Workload of Tactile Patterns in Take-over Scenarios During Automated Driving☆ , 2015 .

[12]  Lisanne Bainbridge,et al.  Ironies of automation , 1982, Autom..

[13]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  “Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? , 2013 .

[14]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  Vibrotactile Displays: A Survey With a View on Highly Automated Driving , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[15]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  Using spatial vibrotactile cues to direct visual attention in driving scenes , 2005 .

[16]  J.B.F. van Erp,et al.  Tactile Torso Display as Countermeasure to Reduce Night Vision Goggles Induced Drift , 2003 .

[17]  S. J. Bolanowski,et al.  Some characteristics of tactile channels , 2004, Behavioural Brain Research.

[18]  Rob Gray,et al.  A Comparison of Different Informative Vibrotactile Forward Collision Warnings: Does the Warning Need to Be Linked to the Collision Event? , 2014, PloS one.

[19]  Linda R. Elliott,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Vibrotactile and Visual Information Displays for Improving Task Performance , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[20]  Klaus Bengler,et al.  A transforming steering wheel for highly automated cars , 2015, 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV).

[21]  Charles Spence,et al.  Tactile warning signals for in-vehicle systems. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  Nadine B. Sarter,et al.  The Need for Multisensory Interfaces in Support of Effective Attention Allocation in Highly Dynamic Event-Driven Domains: The Case of Cockpit Automation , 2000 .

[23]  J C F de Winter,et al.  Comparing spatially static and dynamic vibrotactile take-over requests in the driver seat. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Lynette A. Jones,et al.  Tactile Displays: Guidance for Their Design and Application , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[25]  In Lee,et al.  Evaluation of vibrotactile feedback for forward collision warning on the steering wheel and seatbelt , 2012 .

[26]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  Driver Reaction Time to Tactile and Auditory Rear-End Collision Warnings While Talking on a Cell Phone , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[27]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  To Go or Not to Go: Stimulus-Response Compatibility for Tactile and Auditory Pedestrian Collision Warnings , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[28]  Dick de Waard,et al.  A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics , 1997 .