Exploring local projects for sustainable energy in system transition: local perceptions of success

ABSTRACT In the sustainability transitions literature, ‘success’ is conceived as the transition from an unsustainable system to a sustainable one. However, this view hides a more profound complexity in individual projects which can contribute to system transition. This paper focuses instead on local projects as key sites for change. In two case studies of UK sustainable energy projects, success is shown to be characterised by different causative beliefs held by different people about the problems being addressed, which predetermines solutions to those problems; and hence the nature of success. By acknowledging this multiplicity of success, as perceived by ordinary residents and project organisers as well as transition scholars, ‘narratives of success’ can be recognised, enabling future projects to build on success, and continue along the path to transition. This reconceptualisation provides transition scholars with new ways of understanding and effecting transitions; by focusing on the project level, which is useful in contexts with varying commitment to sustainability.

[1]  S. Hyysalo,et al.  Hyysalo, Juntunen & Freeman: Internet Forums and the Rise of the Inventive Energy User , 2013 .

[2]  E. Shove.  Converging Conventions of Comfort, Cleanliness and Convenience , 2003 .

[3]  B. Flyvbjerg.  Five Misunderstandings About Case-Study Research , 2006, 1304.1186.

[4]  Eva Heiskanen,et al.  Self-building courses of solar heat collectors as sources of consumer empowerment and local embedding of sustainable energy technology , 2014 .

[5]  Elizabeth Shove,et al.  Gaps, barriers and conceptual chasms : theories of technology transfer and energy in buildings , 1998 .

[6]  F. Geels.  Regime Resistance against Low-Carbon Transitions: Introducing Politics and Power into the Multi-Level Perspective , 2014 .

[7]  R. Cialdini.  CURRENT DIRECTIONS IN PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Crafting Normative Messages to Protect the Environment , 2022 .

[8]  Nicola McEwen,et al.  Mobilizing Community Energy , 2012 .

[9]  H. Rohracher,et al.  'Energy regions': The transformative power of regional discourses on socio-technical futures , 2010 .

[10]  F. Geels,et al.  Multi-dimensional struggles in the greening of industry: A dialectic issue lifecycle model and case study , 2012 .

[11]  M. V. Asselt,et al.  More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy , 2001 .

[12]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Emerging in between: The multi-level governance of renewable energy in the English regions , 2007 .

[13]  Gregory C. Unruh.  Understanding carbon lock-in , 2000 .

[14]  Janette Webb,et al.  District energy development in liberalised markets: situating UK heat network development in comparison with Dutch and Norwegian case studies , 2014, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[15]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  “'S Leinn Fhèin Am Fearann” (The Land is Ours): Re-Claiming Land, Re-Creating Community, North Harris, Outer Hebrides, Scotland , 2006 .

[16]  Derk Loorbach,et al.  MANAGING TRANSITIONS FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT , 2006 .

[17]  A. Petersen,et al.  Exploring the Transition Potential of Renewable Energy Communities , 2015 .

[18]  S. Nyborg.  Pilot users and their families - inventing flexible practices in the smart grid , 2015 .

[19]  M. Zhang.  Meso-level factors in technological transitions: The development of TD-SCDMA in China , 2016 .

[20]  J. Essletzbichler.  Renewable Energy Technology and Path Creation: A Multi-scalar Approach to Energy Transition in the UK , 2012 .

[21]  H. Bulkeley,et al.  The co-construction of energy provision and everyday practice: integrating heat pumps in social housing in England , 2015 .

[22]  James P. Warren,et al.  Analysing road pricing implementation processes in the UK and Norway , 2007 .

[23]  F. Geels.  Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study , 2002 .

[24]  H. Lovell.  Supply and Demand for Low Energy Housing in the UK: Insights from a Science and Technology Studies Approach , 2005 .

[25]  E. Heiskanen,et al.  Low-carbon communities as a context for individual behavioural change , 2010 .

[26]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[27]  Anselm L. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research : techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory , 1998 .

[28]  Sylwia Męcfal.  Recenzja książki. Robert K. yin, Case Study Research. Design and Methods (fourth Edition), thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 2009 , 2012 .

[29]  Michael Nye,et al.  Keeping energy visible? Exploring how householders interact with feedback from smart energy monitors in the longer term , 2013 .

[30]  Adrian Smith,et al.  Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges , 2010 .

[31]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  The ongoing energy transition: Lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960-2004) , 2007 .

[32]  Lambèr M. M. Royakkers,et al.  Strategic niche management of social innovations: the case of social entrepreneurship , 2011, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[33]  F. Geels,et al.  Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways , 2007 .

[34]  Eva Heiskanen,et al.  The local community as a “low-carbon lab”: Promises and perils , 2015 .

[35]  Lars Coenen,et al.  Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources , 2012 .

[36]  L. Rickards,et al.  Systems Practice: How to Act in a Climate-Change World , 2012 .

[37]  Kevin Maréchal.  Not irrational but habitual: The importance of "behavioural lock-in" in energy consumption , 2010 .

[38]  Stephen Potter,et al.  A Strategic Niche Analysis of Urban Road Pricing in the UK and Norway , 2007, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research.

[39]  O. Mont,et al.  A Map Is Not a Territory—Making Research More Helpful for Sustainable Consumption Policy , 2014 .

[40]  Mike Hodson,et al.  Mediating Low-Carbon Urban Transitions? Forms of Organization, Knowledge and Action , 2012 .

[41]  E. Shove,et al.  Caution! Transitions Ahead: Politics, Practice, and Sustainable Transition Management , 2007 .

[42]  G. Spinardi,et al.  Spinardi & Slayton: Greener Aviation Take-off (Delayed): Analysing Environmental Transitions with the Multi-Level Perspective , 2015 .

[43]  Lukas H. Meyer,et al.  Summary for Policymakers , 2022, The Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate.

[44]  Arie Rip,et al.  Technological Change , 2019, World Development Report 2020: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains.

[45]  J. Rotmans,et al.  The practice of transition management: Examples and lessons from four distinct cases , 2010 .

[46]  J. Torriti,et al.  Demand response experience in Europe: Policies, programmes and implementation , 2010 .

[47]  B. Latour.  10 ''Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts'' , 1992 .

[48]  Janette Webb,et al.  Influencing household energy practices: a critical review of UK smart metering standards and commercial feedback devices , 2014, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[49]  J. Gosby.  MEDIA REVIEWS: Basics of Qualitative Research - Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory 2nd Edition by A. Strauss and J. Corbin. Sage Publications, , 2000 .

[50]  Frank W. Geels,et al.  The hygienic transition from cesspools to sewer systems (1840-1930): the dynamics of regime transformation , 2006 .

[51]  J. Schot,et al.  Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation : the approach of strategic niche management , 1998 .

[52]  R. Bhaskar.  A realist theory of science , 1976 .

[53]  Noel Longhurst,et al.  What influences the diffusion of grassroots innovations for sustainability? Investigating community currency niches , 2016, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..