How accurate is sperm morphology as an indicator of sperm function?

Sperm morphology has been consistently correlated with fertilisation success or failure. The clinical relevance of the percentage normal spermatozoa has been a widely discussed topic amongst infertility specialists and scientists. This study aimed to evaluate the role of sperm morphology as an indicator of additional sperm functions among 114 andrology referrals. The sperm functions that were investigated included chromatin packaging quality (CMA3 test (n = 109), zona‐induced acrosome reaction (ZIAR test; n = 36), hemizona assay (HZI; n = 36) and progressive motility (n = 47). Chromatin packaging quality had a negative and significant (P = 0.0001, r = −0.74) correlation with the percentage normal spermatozoa, while progressive motility had a significant and positive correlation (P = 0.0001, 0.59). Accurate sperm morphology scoring as described by the WHO 2010 manual can therefore be used as an indicator of specific sperm functions.

[1]  T. K. Jensen,et al.  Relation between semen quality and fertility: a population-based study of 430 first-pregnancy planners , 1998, The Lancet.

[2]  C. Lombard,et al.  Sperm morphologic features as a prognostic factor in in vitro fertilization. , 1986, Fertility and sterility.

[3]  W. Ombelet,et al.  Sperm morphology assessment: historical review in relation to fertility. , 1995, Human reproduction update.

[4]  S. Kahraman,et al.  Effect of abnormal sperm head morphology on the outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection in humans. , 1997, Human reproduction.

[5]  A. Morgentaler,et al.  Sperm morphology and in vitro fertilization outcome: a direct comparison of World Health Organization and strict criteria methodologies. , 1995, Fertility and sterility.

[6]  C. Muller.  Rationale, interpretation, validation, and uses of sperm function tests. , 2000, Journal of andrology.

[7]  T. Kruger,et al.  Lessons learned from a sperm morphology quality control programme , 2006, Andrologia.

[8]  A Spira,et al.  Intra- and inter-individual variability in human sperm concentration, motility and vitality assessment during a workshop involving ten laboratories. , 2000, Human reproduction.

[9]  P. Kolm,et al.  Clinical significance of human sperm-zona pellucida binding. , 1997, Fertility and sterility.

[10]  A. Campana,et al.  Sperm chromatin anomalies can influence decondensation after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. , 1996, Human reproduction.

[11]  C. Barratt,et al.  Diagnostic tools in male infertility-the question of sperm dysfunction. , 2011, Asian journal of andrology.

[12]  A. Pacey,et al.  Lack of compliance by UK andrology laboratories with World Health Organization recommendations for sperm morphology assessment. , 2005, Human Reproduction.

[13]  S. Oehninger.  Clinical and laboratory management of male infertility: an opinion on its current status. , 2000, Journal of andrology.

[14]  S. Oehninger,et al.  Assisted reproduction in the diagnosis and treatment of the male factor. , 1989, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.

[15]  G. Hodgen,et al.  Hemizona assay and teratozoospermia: increasing sperm insemination concentrations to enhance zona pellucida binding. , 1990, Fertility and sterility.

[16]  W. Tilgen,et al.  Clinical relevance of sperm morphology assessment using strict criteria and relationship with sperm-mucus interaction in vivo and in vitro. , 1995, Fertility and sterility.

[17]  E. Bosmans,et al.  Results of a questionnaire on sperm morphology assessment. , 1997, Human reproduction.

[18]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Semen analysis and prediction of natural conception. , 2014, Human reproduction.

[19]  A. Agarwal,et al.  Impact of the New WHO Guidelines on Diagnosis and Practice of Male Infertility , 2011 .

[20]  Greta Verheyen,et al.  Influence of individual sperm morphology on fertilization, embryo morphology, and pregnancy outcome of intracytoplasmic sperm injection. , 2003, Fertility and sterility.

[21]  C. Coddington,et al.  The hemizona assay (HZA): Development of a diagnostic test for the binding of human spermatozoa to the human hemizona pellucida to predict fertilization potential , 1989, Fertility and sterility.

[22]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Reproducibility and reliability of repeated semen analyses in male partners of subfertile couples. , 2010, Fertility and sterility.

[23]  R. Menkveld,et al.  The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria. , 1990, Human reproduction.

[24]  D. Franken,et al.  Clinical importance of zona pellucida-induced acrosome reaction and its predictive value for IVF. , 2001, Human reproduction.

[25]  S. Oehninger,et al.  Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. , 1988, Fertility and sterility.