Aquatic multi-species acute toxicity of (chlorinated) anilines: experimental versus predicted data.

Aquatic toxicity information is essential in environmental risk assessment to determine the potential hazards and risks of new and existing chemicals. Prediction and modelling techniques, such as quantitative structure activity relationships (QSAR) and species sensitivity distributions (SSDs), are applied to fill data gaps and to predict, assess and extrapolate the toxicity of chemicals. In this study, both techniques (i.e. the ECOSAR programme as QSAR tool and SSDs) were assessed for a set of polar narcotic structural analogues that differ in their degree of chloro-substitution (aniline, 4-chloroaniline, 3,5-dichloroaniline and 2,3,4-chloroaniline). The acute toxicity of these compounds was tested in one prokaryote species (Escherichia coli) and three eukaryote aquatic species (Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata, Daphnia magna and Danio rerio). Consequently, the experimental acute toxicity data were compared to the QSAR predictions made by the ECOSAR programme and compared to the species sensitivity modelling results. Large interspecies differences in sensitivity were observed (D. magna>P. subcapitata>D. rerio>E. coli). 4-Chloroaniline acted as an outlier in P. subcapitata toxicity. Whereas in D. magna, toxicity decreased rather than increased with increasing logK(ow) of the test compounds. In general, large interchemical and interspecies differences in toxicity of these relatively simple chemical structures were observed. Moreover, this species variation could not entirely be characterized by the ECOSAR tool. SSD modelling is particularly focussed on species variations and emphasis is put on protecting those species that are most affected by chemical exposure. Compared to QSARs, SSDs offer broader perspectives regarding species sensitivity ranking, however, in this study they could only be applied for aniline and 4-chloroaniline.

[1]  J. Hermens,et al.  Classifying environmental pollutants: Part 3. External validation of the classification system. , 2000, Chemosphere.

[2]  M. Vighi,et al.  Toxicity on the luminescent bacterium Vibrio fischeri (Beijerinck). I: QSAR equation for narcotics and polar narcotics. , 2009, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[3]  Rolf Altenburger,et al.  Structural alerts--a new classification model to discriminate excess toxicity from narcotic effect levels of organic compounds in the acute daphnid assay. , 2005, Chemical research in toxicology.

[4]  Roger L Breton,et al.  A comparison of model performance for six quantitative structure‐activity relationship packages that predict acute toxicity to fish , 2003, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[5]  Bin Wang,et al.  Development of species sensitivity distributions and estimation of HC5 of organochlorine pesticides with five statistical approaches , 2008, Ecotoxicology.

[6]  J R Wheeler,et al.  Species sensitivity distributions: data and model choice. , 2002, Marine pollution bulletin.

[7]  M. Kitagawa,et al.  Expression of ClpB, an analog of the ATP-dependent protease regulatory subunit in Escherichia coli, is controlled by a heat shock sigma factor (sigma 32) , 1991, Journal of bacteriology.

[8]  J. Hermens,et al.  Variation in the sensitivity of aquatic species in relation to the classification of environmental pollutants. , 1997, Chemosphere.

[9]  Robert Combes,et al.  Toxicity testing: creating a revolution based on new technologies. , 2005, Trends in biotechnology.

[10]  T. Shigeoka,et al.  Embryonic development assay with Daphnia magna: application to toxicity of aniline derivatives. , 2001, Chemosphere.

[11]  Ralph Kühne,et al.  Acute to chronic ratios in aquatic toxicity—variation across trophic levels and relationship with chemical structure , 2006, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[12]  J. Hermens,et al.  Pattern analysis of the variation in the sensitivity of aquatic species to toxicants. , 1997, Chemosphere.

[13]  Tomas Öberg,et al.  A QSAR for Baseline Toxicity: Validation, Domain of Application, and Prediction , 2004 .

[14]  Interspecies sensitivity in the aquatic toxicity of aromatic amines. , 2002, Environmental toxicology and pharmacology.

[15]  Shijin Ren.  Predicting three narcosis mechanisms of aquatic toxicity. , 2002, Toxicology letters.

[16]  I. Nobels,et al.  Dose–response relationships and statistical performance of a battery of bacterial gene profiling assays , 2007, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[17]  M. A. Hamilton,et al.  Trimmed Spearman-Karber Method for Estimating Median Lethal Concentrations in Toxicity Bioassays , 1977 .

[18]  S. Koivisto.  Is Daphnia magna an ecologically representative zooplankton species in toxicity tests? , 1995, Environmental pollution.

[19]  M. C. Newman,et al.  Applying species‐sensitivity distributions in ecological risk assessment: Assumptions of distribution type and sufficient numbers of species , 2000 .

[20]  Thomas Knacker,et al.  ECOSAR model performance with a large test set of industrial chemicals. , 2008, Chemosphere.

[21]  Toxicity of substituted anilines to Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata and quantitative structure‐activity relationship analysis for polar narcotics , 2007, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[22]  T W Schultz,et al.  QSARs for monosubstituted anilines eliciting the polar narcosis mechanism of action. , 1991, The Science of the total environment.

[23]  P. Ciffroy,et al.  Effects of data manipulation and statistical methods on species sensitivity distributions , 2004, Environmental toxicology and chemistry.

[24]  J. Hermens,et al.  Classifying environmental pollutants , 1992 .

[25]  S. Hansson,et al.  Ten challenges for improved ecotoxicological testing in environmental risk assessment. , 2006, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[26]  B. Marsálek,et al.  The use of miniaturized algal bioassays in comparison to the standard flask assay , 1998 .

[27]  C. A. V. van Gestel,et al.  Ratios between acute aquatic toxicity and effects on population growth rates in relation to toxicant mode of action , 2000 .