Stance Influences Your Thoughts: Psychology-Inspired Social Media Analytics

There are abundant user posts in social media which contain valuable information. Lots of previous studies focus on social media analytics, such as topic detection, sentiment prediction, and event trend analysis. According to psychological theories, namely affective forecasting, endowment effect, and negativity bias, user stance (one’s role in a specific social event, e.g. involvement) results in biased sentiment and attitude in real scenarios. However, user stance has not been taken into consideration in previous work. In most cases, user stance is a visible factor, so we argue that it should not be ignored. In this paper, we introduce user stance into two real scenarios (sentiment analysis and attitude prediction). Firstly, analyses on two real scenarios indicate that user stance does matter and provides more useful information for event analyses. Different user stance groups have significantly distinct sentiments and attitudes on an event (or a topic). By taking the differences into consideration, it is easy to get better mining results. Secondly, experimental results show that taking user stance information into account improves prediction results. Instead of designing a new algorithm, we propose that different algorithms should incorporate user’s stance information in online social event analysis. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work which integrates psychological theories of user stance bias on understanding social events in the online environment.

[1]  Yiqun Liu,et al.  Microblog Sentiment Analysis with Emoticon Space Model , 2014, Journal of Computer Science and Technology.

[2]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Immune neglect: a source of durability bias in affective forecasting. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[3]  Daniel Gayo-Avello,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of State-of-the-Art Electoral Prediction From Twitter Data , 2012, ArXiv.

[4]  Yoon Kim,et al.  Convolutional Neural Networks for Sentence Classification , 2014, EMNLP.

[5]  K. Vohs,et al.  Case Western Reserve University , 1990 .

[6]  Mohamed M. Mostafa,et al.  More than words: Social networks' text mining for consumer brand sentiments , 2013, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  Weiguo Fan,et al.  The power of social media analytics , 2014, CACM.

[8]  Raji Srinivasan,et al.  Social Influence Effects in Online Product Ratings , 2012 .

[9]  M. Kosinski,et al.  Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Nicholas Beauchamp,et al.  Predicting and Interpolating State‐Level Polls Using Twitter Textual Data , 2017 .

[11]  Eric J. Johnson,et al.  Aspects of Endowment: A Query Theory of Value Construction , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[12]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Affective Forecasting , 2005 .

[13]  Xiangfeng Luo,et al.  Building the Multi-Modal Storytelling of Urban Emergency Events Based on Crowdsensing of Social Media Analytics , 2016, Mobile Networks and Applications.

[14]  Yiqun Liu,et al.  Every Term Has Sentiment: Learning from Emoticon Evidences for Chinese Microblog Sentiment Analysis , 2013, NLPCC.

[15]  Kristina Lerman,et al.  Tripartite graph clustering for dynamic sentiment analysis on social media , 2014, SIGMOD Conference.

[16]  Jennifer S. Mills,et al.  Effects of Exposure to Thin Media Images: Evidence of Self-Enhancement among Restrained Eaters , 2002 .

[17]  T. Graepel,et al.  Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  Tobias Greitemeyer,et al.  Facebook's emotional consequences: Why Facebook causes a decrease in mood and why people still use it , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  Matthew Hurst,et al.  Event Detection and Tracking in Social Streams , 2009, ICWSM.