Sentence context and lexical ambiguity resolution by the two hemispheres

A lexical decision experiment investigated hemisphere asymmetries in resolving lexical ambiguity within a sentence context. Sentences that biased a single meaning (either dominant or subordinate) of sentence-final ambiguous words were followed by a lateralized target related to the sentence-congruent or -incongruent meaning of the ambiguous word, or an unrelated word. In the RVF sentence-congruent targets were facilitated, while incongruent targets were not primed. In contrast, related targets were facilitated in the LVF, regardless of sentence context. This suggests that selecting the contextually appropriate word meaning requires the left hemisphere, and supports a right hemisphere role in maintaining alternate word senses.

[1]  H. Babkoff,et al.  Script as a Priming Stimulus for Lexical Decisions with Visual Hemifield Stimulation , 1997, Brain and Language.

[2]  M. Moscovitch.  Right‐hemisphere language , 1981 .

[3]  P. O'Seaghdha.  The dependence of lexical relatedness effects on syntactic connectedness. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[4]  M. Beeman.  Semantic Processing in the Right Hemisphere May Contribute to Drawing Inferences from Discourse , 1993, Brain and Language.

[5]  M. Faust,et al.  Naming difficulties in language-disabled children: preliminary findings with the application of the tip-of-the-tongue paradigm. , 1997, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[6]  Miriam Faust,et al.  Lexical decision and visual hemifield: An examination of the RT—Accuracy relationship , 1988, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  M. Kutas,et al.  Ambiguous words in context: An event-related potential analysis of the time course of meaning activation ☆ ☆☆ , 1987 .

[8]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading , 1988 .

[9]  C. Chiarello,et al.  Lexical decision and naming asymmetries: Influence of response selection and response bias , 1988, Brain and Language.

[10]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Appreciation of metaphoric alternative word meanings by left and right brain-damaged patients , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  C. Chiarello,et al.  Semantic additivity and semantic inhibition: Dissociable processes in the cerebral hemispheres? , 1992, Brain and Language.

[12]  M. Faust,et al.  Cerebral hemispheric asymmetries in processing lexical metaphors , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  P. Tabossi.  Accessing lexical ambiguity in different types of sentential contexts , 1988 .

[14]  G. Simpson,et al.  Chapter 3 Contextual Feature Activation and Meaning Access , 1991 .

[15]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Language Comprehension As Structure Building , 1990 .

[16]  G. Simpson,et al.  Inhibitory processes in the recognition of homograph meanings. , 1994 .

[17]  Morton Ann Gernsbacher,et al.  Cerebral Mechanisms for Suppression of Inappropriate Information during Sentence Comprehension , 1996, Brain and Language.

[18]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  Susan A. Duffy,et al.  Effects of Prior Encounter and Global Discourse Bias on the Processing of Lexically Ambiguous Words: Evidence From Eye Fixations , 1994 .

[20]  C. Chiarello,et al.  Constraints on Sentence Priming in the Cerebral Hemispheres: Effects of Intervening Words in Sentences and Lists , 1998, Brain and Language.

[21]  H. Gardner,et al.  The comprehension of metaphor in brain-damaged patients. , 1977, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  D. Zaidel,et al.  The Interpretation of Sentence Ambiguity in Patients with Unilateral Focal Brain Surgery , 1995, Brain and Language.

[23]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Time course of priming for associate and inference words in a discourse context , 1988, Memory & cognition.

[24]  C. Burgess,et al.  Cerebral hemispheric mechanisms in the retrieval of ambiguous word meanings , 1988, Brain and Language.

[25]  G. Simpson,et al.  Selective access of homograph meanings in sentence context , 1991 .

[26]  Howard Gardner,et al.  Script knowledge in right hemisphere-damaged and in normal elderly adults , 1987, Brain and Language.

[27]  E. Drews,et al.  Qualitatively different organizational structures of lexical knowledge in the left and right hemisphere , 1987, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  C. Chiarello,et al.  Another look at categorical priming in the cerebral hemispheres , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  Stephen Dopkins,et al.  Lexical ambiguity and eye fixations in reading: A test of competing models of lexical ambiguity resolution , 1992 .

[30]  M. Faust,et al.  Levels of Sentence Constraint and Lexical Decision in the Two Hemispheres , 1998, Brain and Language.

[31]  S. Kravetz,et al.  Linguistic processes in the two cerebral hemispheres: implications for modularity vs interactionism. , 1995, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[32]  C. Chiarello,et al.  Bihemispheric processing of redundant bilateral lexical information. , 1998, Neuropsychology.

[33]  J. Grafman,et al.  Summation Priming and Coarse Semantic Coding in the Right Hemisphere , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  M. Gernsbacher.  Cognitive processes and mechanisms in language comprehension : the structure building framework , 1991 .

[35]  S. Kravetz,et al.  Hemisphericity and Top-Down Processing of Language , 1993, Brain and Language.