Masked Priming of Prefixes and the Influence of Spelling–Meaning Consistency

Two experiments are reported which examined whether a prefixed word can be primed by a word sharing only the prefix letters in a masked priming paradigm. In addition the studies examined whether the size of the priming effect is influenced by the consistency with which a prefix letter pattern appears in real prefixed words. The ratio of real prefixed words to all words containing a prefix letter pattern was calculated and used to identify high-consistency prefixes, which are frequently used as prefixes (e.g., UN in UNHAPPY) and rarely appear as pseudoprefixes (e.g., UNCLE), and low-consistency prefixes, which appear in many pseudoprefixed words (e.g., DE in DESERT) but fewer truly prefixed words (e.g., DECODE). In Experiment 1, decision latencies for both types of prefixes were facilitated when real prefixed target words were preceded by real prefixed prime words in a short SOA masked priming paradigm, although the size of the priming effect for low-consistency prefixes was similar in size to that for orthographic controls. In Experiment 2, real prefixed target words were preceded by pseudoprefixed prime words. Facilitation in performance remained for high-consistency prefixes but was absent for low-consistency prefixes. These results support models of morphological processing that are sensitive to the statistical nature of the relationships between orthographic and semantic representations in a language.

[1]  D. Jared Spelling-Sound Consistency and Regularity Effects in Word Naming , 2002 .

[2]  K. Forster,et al.  Masked priming for prefixed words with bound stems: Does submit prime permit? , 2000 .

[3]  David C. Plaut,et al.  Are non-semantic morphological effects incompatible with a distributed connectionist approach to lexical processing? , 2000 .

[4]  K. McRae,et al.  Automatic semantic similarity priming. , 1998 .

[5]  Debra Jared,et al.  Spelling-Sound Consistency Affects the Naming of High-Frequency Words , 1997 .

[6]  J. Rueckl,et al.  Morphological priming, fragment completion, and connectionist networks , 1997 .

[7]  Laurie Beth Feldman,et al.  Morphological aspects of language processing. , 1997 .

[8]  Manuel Perea,et al.  Associative and semantic priming effects occur at very short stimulus-onset asynchronies in lexical decision and naming , 1997, Cognition.

[9]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[10]  Alessandro Laudanna,et al.  PREFIXES AS PROCESSING UNITS , 1994 .

[11]  Marcus Taft,et al.  Interactive-activation as a framework for understanding morphological processing , 1994 .

[12]  R. Baayen,et al.  Prefix stripping re-revisited , 1994 .

[13]  Matthew Flatt,et al.  PsyScope: An interactive graphic system for designing and controlling experiments in the psychology laboratory using Macintosh computers , 1993 .

[14]  Alessandro Laudanna,et al.  Processing in?ectional and derivational morphology , 1992 .

[15]  A. Friederici,et al.  Inflectional and Derivational Morphology in the Mental Lexicon: Symmetries and Asymmetries in Repetition Priming , 1992 .

[16]  J. Grainger,et al.  Masked morphological priming in visual word recognition. , 1991 .

[17]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  The basis of consistency effects in word naming , 1990 .

[18]  S. Bentin,et al.  The Contribution of Morphological and Semantic Relatedness to Repetition Priming at Short and Long Lags: Evidence from Hebrew , 1990, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[19]  S. E. Napps,et al.  Morphemic relationships in the lexicon: Are they distinct from semantic and formal relationships? , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[20]  James L. McClelland,et al.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. , 1989, Psychological review.

[21]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Lexical access and inflectional morphology , 1988, Cognition.

[22]  C. Fowler,et al.  Relations among regular and irregular morphologically related words in the lexicon as revealed by repetition priming , 1985, Memory & cognition.

[23]  M. Turvey,et al.  Representation of inflected nouns in the internal lexicon , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[24]  Robert F. Stanners,et al.  Memory representation for prefixed words , 1979 .

[25]  R. F. Stanners,et al.  Memory representation for morphologically related words. , 1979 .

[26]  M. Taft Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect , 1979, Memory & cognition.

[27]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words , 1975 .

[28]  J. Oberlander,et al.  Proceedings of the 22nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society , 2000 .

[29]  Zhou Xiaolin,et al.  The combinatorial lexicon: Priming derivational affixes , 1996 .

[30]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[31]  Robert Schreuder,et al.  Modeling morphological processing. , 1995 .

[32]  W. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. , 1994 .

[33]  M. Taft A morphological-decomposition model of lexical representation , 1988 .

[34]  Paolo Zandegiacomo Rizio,et al.  MoBe : A Framework for Context-Aware Mobile Applications , 1987 .

[35]  C. Fowler,et al.  The inflected noun system in Serbo-Croatian: Lexical representation of morphological structure , 1987, Memory & cognition.