Complexity on the rails: A systems-based approach to understanding safety management in rail transport

Abstract Rail transport is a complex, safety-critical system which experiences catastrophic events. Systems theory-based approaches have been applied to understand risk and safety management in a range of safety-critical domains, however in rail, systems approaches have tended to be applied for accident analysis, rather than to describe how risk and safety is proactively managed. This study involved the development of a control structure model of rail transport in Australia using the Systems Theoretic Accident Model and Processes (STAMP) method. The control structure identifies the actors involved in managing safety, and shows the control and feedback mechanisms that comprise the adaptive feedback function to maintain safety. The control structure was refined in a participative process involving subject matter experts. Insights identified for improving safety management included: a need to improve feedback mechanisms to better understand the effectiveness of control measures; a lack of formal controls at higher levels of the system; and a focus within current feedback mechanisms on failures rather than understanding and learning from normal performance. Opportunities for applying the model in industry practice are also explored.

[1]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Is safety a subject for science , 2014 .

[2]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  The crash at Kerang: Investigating systemic and psychological factors leading to unintentional non-compliance at rail level crossings. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[3]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  Human Factors Methods: A Practical Guide for Engineering and Design , 2012 .

[4]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  More than meets the eye: Using cognitive work analysis to identify design requirements for future rail level crossing systems. , 2016, Applied ergonomics.

[5]  Tom Kontogiannis,et al.  A systemic analysis of patterns of organizational breakdowns in accidents: A case from Helicopter Emergency Medical Service (HEMS) operations , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[6]  Paul M. Salmon,et al.  Closing Pandora's Box: adapting a systems ergonomics methodology for better understanding the ecological complexity underpinning the development and prevention of running-related injury , 2017 .

[7]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Towards the development of a system-theoretic model for safety assessment of autonomous merchant vessels , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  A systems approach to risk management through leading safety indicators , 2015, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  Neville A Stanton,et al.  Fitting methods to paradigms: are ergonomics methods fit for systems thinking? , 2017, Ergonomics.

[10]  Jens Rasmussen,et al.  Risk management in a dynamic society: a modelling problem , 1997 .

[11]  Anjum Naweed,et al.  Psychological factors for driver distraction and inattention in the Australian and New Zealand rail industry. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  Anjum Naweed,et al.  Investigating the formal countermeasures and informal strategies used to mitigate SPAD risk in train driving , 2015, Ergonomics.

[13]  Enrico Zio,et al.  The future of risk assessment , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[14]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Systems Theoretic Accident Model and Process (STAMP) safety modelling applied to an aircraft rapid decompression event , 2017 .

[15]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  A new accident model for engineering safer systems , 2004 .

[16]  Tamsyn Edwards,et al.  Systems Change in Transport Control: Applications of Cognitive Work Analysis , 2011 .

[17]  Jinkyun Park,et al.  Use of a big data analysis technique for extracting HRA data from event investigation reports based on the Safety-II concept , 2020, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Learn from what goes right: A demonstration of a new systematic method for identification of leading indicators in healthcare , 2018, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[19]  Nancy G. Leveson,et al.  Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety , 2012 .

[20]  G. R. J. Hockey,et al.  The railway as a socio-technical system: Human factors at the heart of successful rail engineering , 2007 .

[21]  Neelam Naikar Work Domain Analysis: Concepts, Guidelines, and Cases , 2013 .

[22]  Neville A. Stanton,et al.  Integrating Human Factors Methods and Systems Thinking for Transport Analysis and Design , 2017 .

[23]  Patrick Waterson,et al.  Systems thinking, the Swiss Cheese Model and accident analysis: a comparative systemic analysis of the Grayrigg train derailment using the ATSB, AcciMap and STAMP models. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Giulio Di Gravio,et al.  Defining the functional resonance analysis space: Combining Abstraction Hierarchy and FRAM , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[25]  Paul M Salmon,et al.  Who is in control of road safety? A STAMP control structure analysis of the road transport system in Queensland, Australia. , 2016, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  Liu Hong,et al.  STAMP-based analysis on the railway accident and accident spreading: Taking the China-Jiaoji railway accident for example , 2010 .

[27]  Guy H. Walker,et al.  STAMP goes EAST: Integrating systems ergonomics methods for the analysis of railway level crossing safety management , 2018, Safety Science.