IMAGE QUALITY ASSESSMENT OF HIGH-RESOLUTION SATELLITE IMAGES WITH MTF-BASED FUZZY COMPREHENSIVE EVALUATION METHOD

Abstract. A Modulation Transfer Function (MTF)-based fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method was proposed in this paper for the purpose of evaluating high-resolution satellite image quality. To establish the factor set, two MTF features and seven radiant features were extracted from the knife-edge region of image patch, which included Nyquist, MTF0.5, entropy, peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR), average difference, edge intensity, average gradient, contrast and ground spatial distance (GSD). After analyzing the statistical distribution of above features, a fuzzy evaluation threshold table and fuzzy evaluation membership functions was established. The experiments for comprehensive quality assessment of different natural and artificial objects was done with GF2 image patches. The results showed that the calibration field image has the highest quality scores. The water image has closest image quality to the calibration field, quality of building image is a little poor than water image, but much higher than farmland image. In order to test the influence of different features on quality evaluation, the experiment with different weights were tested on GF2 and SPOT7 images. The results showed that different weights correspond different evaluating effectiveness. In the case of setting up the weights of edge features and GSD, the image quality of GF2 is better than SPOT7. However, when setting MTF and PSNR as main factor, the image quality of SPOT7 is better than GF2.

[1]  Jianfeng Yang,et al.  Criticality evaluation of petrochemical equipment based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and a BP neural network , 2009 .

[2]  Aime Meygret,et al.  In-flight refocusing and MTF assessment of SPOT5 HRG and HRS cameras , 2003, SPIE Remote Sensing.

[3]  Liu Xiao-man,et al.  Image Quality Evaluation of HJ-1 Satellite CCD Sensor , 2010 .

[4]  Mattia Crespi,et al.  A Procedure for High Resolution Satellite Imagery Quality Assessment , 2009, Sensors.

[5]  Robert LIN,et al.  NOTE ON FUZZY SETS , 2014 .

[6]  John M. Irvine,et al.  National imagery interpretability rating scales (NIIRS): overview and methodology , 1997, Optics & Photonics.

[7]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The Concepts of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning , 1975 .

[8]  Li Junjie Radiometric Image Quality Assessment of ZY-3 TLC Camera , 2012 .

[9]  K. Thome,et al.  Radiometric Characterization of IKONOS Multispectral Imagery , 2003 .

[10]  Lin Li,et al.  User-Oriented Image Quality Assessment of ZY-3 Satellite Imagery , 2014, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[11]  Farhad Samadzadegan,et al.  Spatial Quality Assessment of Pan-Sharpened High Resolution Satellite Imagery Based on an Automatically Estimated Edge Based Metric , 2013, Remote. Sens..

[12]  Fu Yao,et al.  Image quality evaluation based on image weighted separating block peak signal to noise ratio , 2003, International Conference on Neural Networks and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings of the 2003.

[13]  Liu Shun-xi Image Characteristics Analysis and Application Accuracy Assessment of ALOS Data , 2008 .

[14]  Yukihiro Nishida,et al.  Modified slanted-edge method and multidirectional modulation transfer function estimation. , 2014, Optics express.