Advanced Integration of Neural Networks for Characterizing Voids in Welded Strips

Within the framework of aging materials inspection, one of the most important aspects regards defects detection in metal welded strips. In this context, it is important to plan a method able to distinguish the presence or absence of defects within welds as well as a robust procedure able to characterize the defect itself. In this paper an innovative solution that exploits a rotating magnetic field is presented. This approach has been carried out by a Finite Element Model. Within this framework, it is necessary to consider techniques able to offer advantages in terms of sensibility of analysis, strong reliability, speed of carrying out, low costs: its implementation can be a useful support for inspectors. To this aim, it is necessary to solve inverse problems which are mostly ill-posed: in this case, the main problems consist on both the accurate formulation of the direct problem and the correct regularization of the inverse electromagnetic problem. In the last decades, a useful and very performing way to regularize ill-posed inverse electromagnetic problems is based on the use of a Neural Network approach, the so called "learning by sample techniques".

[1]  Hiroyuki Fukutomi,et al.  Benchmark models of eddy current testing for steam generator tube: Experiment and numerical analysis , 1994 .

[2]  A. M. Lewis,et al.  A theoretical model of the response of an eddy-current probe to a surface-breaking metal fatigue crack in a flat test-piece , 1992 .

[3]  H. Tsuboi,et al.  Three-dimensional analysis of eddy current distributions by the boundary element method using vector variables , 1987 .

[4]  Ingrid Daubechies,et al.  Ten Lectures on Wavelets , 1992 .

[5]  Simon Haykin,et al.  Neural Networks: A Comprehensive Foundation , 1998 .

[6]  Ron Kohavi,et al.  A Study of Cross-Validation and Bootstrap for Accuracy Estimation and Model Selection , 1995, IJCAI.

[7]  Warren B. Powell,et al.  Approximate Dynamic Programming - Solving the Curses of Dimensionality , 2007 .

[8]  Christopher M. Bishop,et al.  Neural networks for pattern recognition , 1995 .

[9]  J. Bowler Eddy‐current interaction with an ideal crack. I. The forward problem , 1994 .

[10]  Warren B. Powell,et al.  “Approximate dynamic programming: Solving the curses of dimensionality” by Warren B. Powell , 2007, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[11]  Raimond Grimberg,et al.  Analytical solutions describing the operation of a rotating magnetic field transducer , 1997 .

[12]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis: Draper/Applied Regression Analysis , 1998 .

[13]  J. Nazuno Haykin, Simon. Neural networks: A comprehensive foundation, Prentice Hall, Inc. Segunda Edición, 1999 , 2000 .

[14]  I. Jolliffe Principal Component Analysis , 2002 .

[15]  L. Kettunen,et al.  Geometric interpretation of discrete approaches to solving magnetostatic problems , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics.

[16]  N. Draper,et al.  Applied Regression Analysis , 1966 .

[17]  Raimond Grimberg,et al.  Calculation of the induced electromagnetic field created by an arbitrary current distribution located outside a conductive cylinder , 1997 .

[18]  Warren B. Powell,et al.  Approximate Dynamic Programming: Solving the Curses of Dimensionality (Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics) , 2007 .

[19]  Hiroyuki Fukutomi,et al.  Numerical evaluation of correlation between crack size and eddy current testing signal by a very fast simulator , 1998 .

[20]  D. Rodger,et al.  Interfacing the general 3D A- psi method with a thin sheet conductor model , 1992 .

[21]  Vera Kurková,et al.  Kolmogorov's theorem and multilayer neural networks , 1992, Neural Networks.

[22]  U. Christensen,et al.  A network mesh method to calculate eddy currents on conducting surfaces , 1982 .

[23]  Kevin N. Gurney,et al.  An introduction to neural networks , 2018 .