Repeatability of the searching process in reviews of restoration outcomes

[1]  Nick Salafsky,et al.  Save the Whales? Save the Rainforest? Save the Data! , 2010, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[2]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review and Theory Symbiosis: An Introspective Retrospective , 2018, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[3]  Mary Tate,et al.  Contextualizing the twin concepts of systematicity and transparency in information systems literature reviews , 2016, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Mangala Krishnamurthy,et al.  Comparing retrieval of systematic review searches in health sciences areas using two major databases , 2016 .

[5]  L. Brudvig.  Toward prediction in the restoration of biodiversity , 2017 .

[6]  R. Peng.  Reproducible Research in Computational Science , 2011, Science.

[7]  T. Tregenza,et al.  Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[8]  E. Ceccon,et al.  Is Direct Seeding a Biologically Viable Strategy for Restoring Forest Ecosystems? Evidences from a Meta‐analysis , 2016 .

[9]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[10]  Guy Paré,et al.  Transparency in literature reviews: an assessment of reporting practices across review types and genres in top IS journals , 2017, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[11]  A. Pullin,et al.  Guidelines for Systematic Review in Conservation and Environmental Management , 2006, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[12]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  Systematic reviews and meta-analyses in the health sciences: Best practice methods for research syntheses. , 2019, Social science & medicine.

[13]  Biljana Macura,et al.  "A little learning is a dangerous thing": A call for better understanding of the term 'systematic review'. , 2017, Environment international.

[14]  K. Shojania,et al.  How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[15]  Joanna M. Wardlaw,et al.  Whole Brain Magnetic Resonance Image Atlases: A Systematic Review of Existing Atlases and Caveats for Use in Population Imaging , 2017, Front. Neuroinform..

[16]  S. Hellweg,et al.  Biodiversity Recovery and Transformation Impacts for Wetland Biodiversity. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Guy Paré,et al.  (Re)considering the Concept of Literature Review Reproducibility , 2020, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Anders Grimvall,et al.  How effective are created or restored freshwater wetlands for nitrogen and phosphorus removal? A systematic review , 2013, Environmental Evidence.

[19]  Neal R Haddaway.  Response to "Collating science-based evidence to inform public opinion on the environmental effects of marine drilling platforms in the Mediterranean Sea". , 2017, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  Neal R. Haddaway,et al.  Open Synthesis: on the need for evidence synthesis to embrace Open Science , 2018, Environmental Evidence.

[21]  Neal R Haddaway,et al.  What is the effect of prescribed burning in temperate and boreal forest on biodiversity, beyond pyrophilous and saproxylic species? A systematic review , 2018, Environmental Evidence.

[22]  Michel J. Kaiser,et al.  Your evidence or mine? Systematic evaluation of reviews of marine protected area effectiveness , 2017 .

[23]  C. Tian,et al.  Soil organic carbon changes following wetland restoration: A global meta-analysis , 2019, Geoderma.

[24]  Michel J. Kaiser,et al.  Evaluating and improving the reliability of evidence syntheses in conservation and environmental science: A methodology , 2014 .

[25]  Ludo Waltman,et al.  Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping , 2009, Scientometrics.

[26]  Mike Calver,et al.  Why discrepancies in searching the conservation biology literature matter , 2017 .

[27]  Sebastian K. Boell,et al.  Debating systematic literature reviews (SLR) and their ramifications for IS: a rejoinder to Mike Chiasson, Briony Oates, Ulrike Schultze, and Richard Watson , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[28]  H. Jactel,et al.  Can linear transportation infrastructure verges constitute a habitat and/or a corridor for insects in temperate landscapes? A systematic review , 2018, Environmental Evidence.

[29]  Neal R Haddaway,et al.  The multifunctional roles of vegetated strips around and within agricultural fields , 2018, Environmental Evidence.

[30]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  A Replication Manifesto , 2014, AIS Trans. Replication Res..

[31]  Guy Paré,et al.  Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews , 2015, Inf. Manag..

[32]  D. Moher,et al.  Reprint--preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. , 2009, Physical therapy.

[33]  J. Kollmann,et al.  Towards a population approach for evaluating grassland restoration—a systematic review , 2018 .

[34]  Helen R. Bayliss,et al.  The reliability of evidence review methodology in environmental science and conservation , 2016 .

[35]  Helen R. Bayliss,et al.  Information retrieval for ecological syntheses , 2015, Research synthesis methods.

[36]  Neal R. Haddaway,et al.  A rapid method to increase transparency and efficiency in web-based searches , 2017, Environmental Evidence.

[37]  C. A. Howell,et al.  How can we improve information delivery to support conservation and restoration decisions? , 2010, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[38]  A. Saraiva,et al.  Gaps and limitations in the use of restoration scenarios: a review , 2018, Restoration Ecology.

[39]  Eliza M. Grames,et al.  Use of study design principles would increase the reproducibility of reviews in conservation biology , 2020, Biological Conservation.

[40]  Geoff K Frampton,et al.  Updating and amending systematic reviews and systematic maps in environmental management , 2016, Environmental Evidence.

[41]  Neal R Haddaway,et al.  How does tillage intensity affect soil organic carbon? A systematic review , 2017, Environmental Evidence.

[42]  J. J. Zocche,et al.  Use of artificial perches by birds in ecological restoration areas of the Cerrado and Atlantic Forest biomes in Brazil , 2018 .

[43]  Amber E. Budden,et al.  Publication bias and merit in ecology , 2007 .

[44]  Biljana Macura,et al.  Eight problems with literature reviews and how to fix them , 2020, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[45]  T. Beechie,et al.  A systematic review of ecological attributes that confer resilience to climate change in environmental restoration , 2017, PloS one.

[46]  Ricardo Ribeiro Rodrigues,et al.  Is the methodology used in reviews of restoration outcomes reliable? A systematic map protocol , 2020 .

[47]  M. Craig,et al.  Contribution of genetics to ecological restoration , 2015, Molecular ecology.

[48]  Biljana Macura,et al.  Systematic reviews and maps as tools for applying behavioral ecology to management and policy , 2018, Behavioral Ecology.

[49]  Julia Koricheva,et al.  Cumulative meta–analysis: a new tool for detection of temporal trends and publication bias in ecology , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[50]  Shinichi Nakagawa,et al.  Research Weaving: Visualizing the Future of Research Synthesis. , 2018, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[51]  Neal R Haddaway,et al.  Making literature reviews more reliable through application of lessons from systematic reviews , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[52]  Padraic Monaghan,et al.  Sleep-Driven Computations in Speech Processing , 2017, PloS one.

[53]  Jaqueline Tomiê Fujimoto,et al.  Assessing ecological restoration as a research topic using bibliometric indicators , 2018, Ecological Engineering.

[54]  Wenjun Li,et al.  China's Rangeland Management Policy Debates: What Have We Learned?☆ , 2015 .

[55]  S. Willich,et al.  How Objective are Systematic Reviews? Differences between Reviews on Complementary Medicine , 2003 .

[56]  P. Meli,et al.  Reliability of evidence‐review methods in restoration ecology , 2020, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[57]  Mike Chiasson,et al.  Avoiding methodological overdose: a declaration for independent ends , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..

[58]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[59]  Neal R. Haddaway,et al.  A methodology for systematic mapping in environmental sciences , 2016, Environmental Evidence.

[60]  C. Peng,et al.  How is biodiversity changing in response to ecological restoration in terrestrial ecosystems? A meta-analysis in China. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[61]  M. Hammersley.  On 'systematic' reviews of research literatures: A 'narrative' response to Evans & Benefield , 2001 .

[62]  Emma Ladouceur,et al.  The power of data synthesis to shape the future of the restoration community and capacity , 2020, Restoration Ecology.

[63]  Hans Ekkehard Plesser,et al.  Reproducibility vs. Replicability: A Brief History of a Confused Terminology , 2018, Front. Neuroinform..

[64]  Shannon Robalino,et al.  Systematic searching for environmental evidence using multiple tools and sources , 2017, Environmental Evidence.

[65]  Sebastian K. Boell,et al.  On being ‘systematic’ in literature reviews in IS , 2015, J. Inf. Technol..