MERIT: A Scalable Approach for Protocol Assessment

MERIT is a framework that can be used to assess routing protocols in mobile ad hoc networks (manets). It uses the novel concept of a shortest mobile path (SMP) in a mobile graph, a generalization of the shortest path problem for mobile environments. As a measure for routing protocol assessment, we propose the mean ratio of the cost of the route used by a protocol to the cost of the optimal mobile path for the same network history. The cost reflects that the route used in a session can change over time because of network dynamics such as topology changes. The aim is for the ratio to be an abstract, inherent measure of the protocol that is as implementation-independent as possible. The MERIT spectrum, which is the ratio expressed as the function of some parameters of interest, is a characterization of protocol effectiveness. MERIT, for MEan Real vs. Ideal cosT, provides a scalable assessment framework: rather than comparing performance measures of different protocols directly, we compare a protocol to the optimal solution. That is, rather than forcing the comparison to be in the same system, it is done once for each protocol in its own environment. Furthermore, we show that there is an efficient algorithm to solve the underlying SMP problem for important cases, making the approach practically feasible. We also investigate generalizations of and extensions within the MERIT framework. We show that the MERIT framework is rich, with much wider generality and potential applicability than assessing routing protocols.

[1]  Jean-Yves Le Boudec,et al.  Application of Network Calculus to Guaranteed Service Networks , 1998, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[2]  M. S. Corson,et al.  A highly adaptive distributed routing algorithm for mobile wireless networks , 1997, Proceedings of INFOCOM '97.

[3]  András Faragó,et al.  Inverse Optimization in High-speed Networks , 2003, Discret. Appl. Math..

[4]  Charles E. Perkins,et al.  Ad-hoc on-demand distance vector routing , 1999, Proceedings WMCSA'99. Second IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications.

[5]  András Faragó,et al.  Merit: A unified framework for routing protocol assessment in mobile AD Hoc networks , 2001, MobiCom '01.

[6]  Cheng-Shang Chang,et al.  Performance guarantees in communication networks , 2000, Eur. Trans. Telecommun..

[7]  Mineo Takai,et al.  Effects of wireless physical layer modeling in mobile ad hoc networks , 2001, MobiHoc '01.

[8]  Gregory A. Hansen,et al.  The Optimized Link State Routing Protocol , 2003 .

[9]  Zheng Wang,et al.  On the Complexity of Quality of Service Routing , 1999, Inf. Process. Lett..

[10]  Wang Heng-jun Routing in AD HOC Networks of Mobile Hosts , 2002 .

[11]  David A. Maltz,et al.  A performance comparison of multi-hop wireless ad hoc network routing protocols , 1998, MobiCom '98.

[12]  Joseph P. Macker,et al.  Mobile Ad hoc Networking (MANET): Routing Protocol Performance Issues and Evaluation Considerations , 1999, RFC.

[13]  Elizabeth M. Belding-Royer,et al.  A review of current routing protocols for ad hoc mobile wireless networks , 1999, IEEE Wirel. Commun..