Semiconductor sidewall shape estimation

For process control, linewidth measurements are com- monly performed on semiconductor wafers using top-down images from critical dimension measurement scanning electron micro- scopes (CD-SEMs). However, a measure of the line sidewall shape will be required as linewidths continue to shrink. Sidewall shape can be measured by physically cleaving the device and performing an SEM scan of the cross section, but this process is time consuming and results in destruction of product wafers. We develop a tech- nique to estimate sidewall shape from top-down SEM images using pattern recognition based on historical cross section/top-down im- age pairs. Features are computed on subimages extracted from the top-down images. Several combinations of principal component analysis (PCA) and flavors of linear discriminant analysis (LDA) are employed to reduce the dimensionality of the feature vectors and maximize the spread between different sidewall shapes. Direct, weighted LDA (DW-LDA) results in a feature set that provides the best sidewall shape estimation. Experimental testing of the sidewall estimation system shows a root mean square error of approximately 1.8% of the linewidth, showing that this system is a viable method for estimating sidewall shape with little impact on the fabrication process (no new hardware and a minimal increase in process setup). © 2004 SPIE and IS&T. (DOI: 10.1117/1.1763586)

[1]  Kenneth W. Tobin,et al.  Sidewall structure estimation from CD-SEM for lithographic process control , 2003, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[2]  B. Ripley,et al.  Pattern Recognition , 1968, Nature.

[3]  D J Field,et al.  Relations between the statistics of natural images and the response properties of cortical cells. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[4]  Robert P. W. Duin,et al.  Multiclass Linear Dimension Reduction by Weighted Pairwise Fisher Criteria , 2001, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[5]  Jeffery R. Price,et al.  Towards robust face recognition from video , 2001, Proceedings 30th Applied Imagery Pattern Recognition Workshop (AIPR 2001). Analysis and Understanding of Time Varying Imagery.

[6]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition Using Class Specific Linear Projection , 1996, ECCV.

[7]  J. Wade Davis,et al.  Statistical Pattern Recognition , 2003, Technometrics.

[8]  Hua Yu,et al.  A direct LDA algorithm for high-dimensional data - with application to face recognition , 2001, Pattern Recognit..

[9]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Discriminant analysis of principal components for face recognition , 1998, Proceedings Third IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition.

[10]  Nicolai Petkov,et al.  Comparison of texture features based on Gabor filters , 1999, Proceedings 10th International Conference on Image Analysis and Processing.

[11]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Discriminant analysis of principal components for face recognition , 1998 .

[12]  Ja-Chen Lin,et al.  A new LDA-based face recognition system which can solve the small sample size problem , 1998, Pattern Recognit..

[13]  David G. Stork,et al.  Pattern Classification (2nd ed.) , 1999 .

[14]  Kenneth W. Tobin,et al.  Estimating cross-section semiconductor structure by comparing top-down SEM images , 2003, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[15]  Shigeo Abe DrEng Pattern Classification , 2001, Springer London.

[16]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition Using Class Specific Linear Projection , 1996, ECCV.