Schedule risk analysis for new-product development: The GERT method extended by a characteristic function

Schedule risk analysis plays a key role in new product development. A typical project-schedule model using the Critical Path Method (CPM) and Program, Evaluation, and Review Technique (PERT) falls short in many practical situations. Instead, a graphical evaluation and review technique (GERT) has been recommended for its ability to address probability branches and loops. This paper introduces a GERT model based on a characteristic function and designs its numerical solution. First, an inversion formula is applied to derive the probability distribution of the completion time of a product development. Second, to address the implications of a due date, a novel measure of schedule risk is introduced to give a view of both loss and probability. Third, an elasticity analysis is used to identify the network parameters that facilitate the control of schedule risk. A case study of new product development in a high-technology enterprise is presented to demonstrate the proposed methods. The approach will be useful in schedule risk analysis across several problem domains including engineering, environment, management, economic development, etc.

[1]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  A Survey of Activity Network‐Based Process Models for Managing Product Development Projects , 2007 .

[2]  C. Loch,et al.  Project Management Under Risk : Using the Real Options Approach to Evaluate Flexibility in R & D Arnd Huchzermeier , 1999 .

[3]  S. Kaplan,et al.  On The Quantitative Definition of Risk , 1981 .

[4]  Desheng Dash Wu,et al.  A risk analysis model in concurrent engineering product development. , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[5]  Erik Demeulemeester,et al.  Incorporation of activity sensitivity measures into buffer management to manage project schedule risk , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Ofer Zwikael,et al.  The Effectiveness of Risk Management: An Analysis of Project Risk Planning Across Industries and Countries , 2011, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[7]  John E. Kolassa,et al.  Series Approximation Methods in Statistics , 1994 .

[8]  Terje Aven,et al.  The risk concept - historical and recent development trends , 2012, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[9]  Erik Demeulemeester,et al.  A new approach for quantitative risk analysis , 2010, Annals of Operations Research.

[10]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Sources of Schedule Risk in Complex System Development , 1999 .

[11]  C. Robert Kenley,et al.  Analysis of the effect of risk management practices on the performance of new product development programs , 2014 .

[12]  H. Bohman,et al.  A method to calculate the distribution function when the characteristic function is known , 1970 .

[13]  Mario Vanhoucke Measuring the efficiency of project control using fictitious and empirical project data , 2012 .

[14]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  An Adaptive Process Model to Support Product Development Project Management , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[15]  W. Duncan A GUIDE TO THE PROJECT MANAGEMENT BODY OF KNOWLEDGE , 1996 .

[16]  Jennifer A. Farris,et al.  Improving Product Development Performance Through Iteration Front-Loading , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[17]  Sundar G. Bharadwaj,et al.  Complementary Drivers of New Product Development Performance: Cross‐Functional Coordination, Information System Capability, and Intelligence Quality , 2012 .

[18]  Hadley Wickham,et al.  Graphics for Statistics and Data Analysis with R , 2010 .

[19]  Ehsan Elahi,et al.  An Integrated Outsourcing Framework: Analyzing Boeing’s Outsourcing Program for Dreamliner (B787) , 2014 .

[20]  Hilda C. Martínez León,et al.  An analytical management framework for new product development processes featuring uncertain iterations , 2013 .

[21]  Seyed Hossein Iranmanesh,et al.  A management oriented approach to reduce a project duration and its risk (variability) , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[22]  Terje Aven,et al.  Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Robert D. Braun,et al.  Technology Readiness Level, Schedule Risk, and Slippage in Spacecraft Design , 2008 .

[24]  B. Yum,et al.  An uncertainty importance measure of activities in PERT networks , 1997 .

[25]  Chengshuang Sun,et al.  Study on BIM-based construction project cost and schedule risk early warning , 2015, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[26]  Tyson R. Browning,et al.  Modeling impacts of process architecture on cost and schedule risk in product development , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[27]  Dvir Shabtay,et al.  Optimal due date assignment and resource allocation in a group technology scheduling environment , 2010, Comput. Oper. Res..

[28]  Miodrag Lovric,et al.  International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science , 2011 .

[29]  Terry Williams Criticality in Stochastic Networks , 1992 .

[30]  Robert P. Smith,et al.  The iterative component of design , 1996, IEMC 96 Proceedings. International Conference on Engineering and Technology Management. Managing Virtual Enterprises: A Convergence of Communications, Computing, and Energy Technologies.

[31]  S. Meysam Mousavi,et al.  An earned value model with risk analysis for project management under uncertain conditions , 2017, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst..

[32]  Steven D. Eppinger,et al.  Improving product development process design: a method for managing information flows, risks, and iterations , 2011 .

[33]  Bajis M. Dodin,et al.  Approximating the Criticality Indices of the Activities in PERT Networks , 1985 .

[34]  Bernard W. Taylor,et al.  Multiteam, Multiproject Research and Development Planning with GERT , 1977 .

[35]  Terje Aven,et al.  Moving beyond probabilities - Strength of knowledge characterisations applied to security , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[36]  Xianyi Gao,et al.  Schedule risk management at early stages of large construction projects based on the GERT model , 2013, IEEE Conference Anthology.

[37]  Juite Wang,et al.  An overlapping process model to assess schedule risk for new product development , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[38]  Richard L. Warr Numerical Approximation of Probability Mass Functions via the Inverse Discrete Fourier Transform , 2012 .

[39]  L. Valadares Tavares,et al.  A comparative morphologic analysis of benchmark sets of project networks , 2002 .

[40]  A. Alan B. Pritsker,et al.  GERT - Graphical Evaluation and Review Technique , 1966 .

[41]  S. Elmaghraby,et al.  Optimal Time-Cost Trade-Offs in GERT Networks , 1972 .

[42]  B. Mulholland,et al.  Risk Assessment in Construction Schedules , 1999 .

[43]  Boulevard de Constance,et al.  On Uncertainty, Ambiguity, and Complexity in Project Management , 2002 .

[44]  Amir Azaron,et al.  The use of a GERT based method to model concurrent product development processes , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[45]  N. Ushakov Selected Topics in Characteristic Functions , 1999 .

[46]  Kevin J. Keen Graphics for Statistics and Data Analysis with R , 2010 .

[47]  Mario Vanhoucke,et al.  Using activity sensitivity and network topology information to monitor project time performance , 2010 .