Extraction, analysis and representation of imperfect conditional and causal sentences by means of a semi-automatic process

Causality is not only a matter of causal statements, but also of conditional sentences. In conditional statements, causality generally emerges from the entailment relationship between the antecedent and the consequence. This entailment is frequently vague and uncertain in nature. In this article, we present a method of retrieving crisp and imperfect conditional and causal sentences identified by some linguistic patterns. These sentences are pre-processed to obtain both single cause-effect structures and causal chains. The result is displayed automatically in an imperfect causal graph by means of a Java application. The causal graph shows the strenght of the causal link labelling it with a fuzzy quantifier and the intensity of the cause or effect nodes with linguistics hedges. The knowledge base used to provide automatic information based on causal relations was some medical texts, suited for the described process.

[1]  B. Kosko Fuzziness vs. probability , 1990 .

[2]  Alejandro Sobrino,et al.  Extraction of Conditional and Causal Sentences from Queries to Provide a Flexible Answer , 2009, FQAS.

[3]  Leo Joskowicz,et al.  Deep domain models for discourse analysis , 1989, [1989] Proceedings. The Annual AI Systems in Government Conference.

[4]  Dennis M. Buede,et al.  Convergence in problem solving: a prelude to quantitative analysis , 1993, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[5]  José A. Olivas,et al.  Analysis, detection and classification of certain conditional sentences in text documents , 2008 .

[6]  W.-R. Zhang,et al.  A cognitive-map-based approach to the coordination of distributed cooperative agents , 1992, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[7]  David Sims,et al.  Thinking in organizations , 1979 .

[8]  John Kontos,et al.  On the acquisition of causal knowledge from scientific texts with attribute grammars , 1991 .

[9]  Lawrence J. Mazlack,et al.  Imperfect Causality , 2003, Fundam. Informaticae.

[10]  W. Pitts,et al.  A Logical Calculus of the Ideas Immanent in Nervous Activity (1943) , 2021, Ideas That Created the Future.

[11]  Roxana Gîrju,et al.  Automatic Detection of Causal Relations for Question Answering , 2003, ACL 2003.

[12]  Mallory Selfridge,et al.  Learning Causal Models by Understanding Real-World Natural Language Explanations , 1985, Conference on Artificial Intelligence Applications.

[13]  M. Bunge Causality and modern science , 1979 .

[14]  Charles C. Ragin,et al.  Fuzzy-Set Social Science , 2001 .

[15]  Bart Kosko,et al.  Fuzzy Cognitive Maps , 1986, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[16]  Ross D. Shachter,et al.  A Decision-based View of Causality , 1994, UAI.

[17]  Roger I. Hall,et al.  Influence Diagrams and Organizational Power. , 1980 .

[18]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  A COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH TO FUZZY QUANTIFIERS IN NATURAL LANGUAGES , 1983 .

[19]  Syin Chan,et al.  Extracting Causal Knowledge from a Medical Database Using Graphical Patterns , 2000, ACL.

[20]  Daniela Garcia,et al.  COATIS, an NLP System to Locate Expressions of Actions Connected by Causality Links , 1997, EKAW.

[21]  R. M. Kaplan,et al.  Knowledge-based acquisition of causal relationships in text , 1991 .

[22]  Peter Spirtes,et al.  An Anytime Algorithm for Causal Inference , 2001, AISTATS.

[23]  Dan Klein,et al.  Fast Exact Inference with a Factored Model for Natural Language Parsing , 2002, NIPS.

[24]  Cathy M. Helgason,et al.  PERCEPTION-BASED REASONING AND FUZZY CARDINALITY PROVIDE DIRECT MEASURES OF CAUSALITY SENSITIVE TO INITIAL CONDITIONS IN THE INDIVIDUAL PATIENT(INVITED PAPER) , 2002 .

[25]  Hugo Liu,et al.  ConceptNet — A Practical Commonsense Reasoning Tool-Kit , 2004 .

[26]  Christine Gohl Causal relations in spoken discourse: Asyndetic constructions as a means for giving reasons , 2000 .