Proceedings of the 2002 Usenix Annual Technical Conference a Precise and Efficient Evaluation of the Proximity between Web Clients and Their Local Dns Servers

Content Distribution Networks (CDNs) attempt to improve Web performance by delivering Web content to end-users from servers located at the edge of the network. An important factor contributing to the performance improvement is the ability of a CDN to select servers in the proximity of the requesting clients. Most CDNs today use the Domain Name System (DNS) to make such server selection decisions. However, DNS provides only the IP address of the client’s local DNS server to the CDN, rather than the client’s IP address. Therefore, CDNs using DNS-based server selection assume that clients are “close” to their local DNS servers. To quantify the proximity between clients and their local DNS servers, we propose a novel, precise, and efficient technique for finding the associations of client to local DNS servers. We collected more than 4.2 million such unique associations in three months. From this data, we study the impact of proximity on DNS-based server selection using four different proximity metrics. We conclude that DNS is good for very coarse-grained server selection, since 64% of the associations belong to the same Autonomous System. DNS is less useful for finergrained server selection, since only 16% of the client and local DNS associations are in the same network-aware cluster [13] (based on BGP routing information from a wide set of routers). As an application of this methodology, we evaluate DNS-based server selection in three of the largest commercially deployed CDNs to study its accuracy.

[1]  Brad Cain,et al.  Known Content Network (CN) Request-Routing Mechanisms , 2003, RFC.

[2]  Balachander Krishnamurthy,et al.  On network-aware clustering of Web clients , 2000, SIGCOMM.

[3]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  Analysis of Task Assignment Policies in Scalable Distributed Web-Server Systems , 1998, IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst..

[4]  Balachander Krishnamurthy,et al.  Topology modeling via cluster graphs , 2001, IMW '01.

[5]  Fred Douglis,et al.  CDN brokering , 2002, Comput. Commun..

[6]  Azer Bestavros,et al.  DNS-based Internet client clustering and characterization , 2001 .

[7]  Philip S. Yu,et al.  Dynamic load balancing in geographically distributed heterogeneous Web servers , 1998, Proceedings. 18th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (Cat. No.98CB36183).

[8]  Kirk L. Johnson,et al.  The measured performance of content distribution networks , 2001, Comput. Commun..

[9]  Anees Shaikh,et al.  On the effectiveness of DNS-based server selection , 2001, Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM 2001. Conference on Computer Communications. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Society (Cat. No.01CH37213).

[10]  Balachander Krishnamurthy,et al.  On the use and performance of content distribution networks , 2001, IMW '01.

[11]  Fred Douglis,et al.  Known CDN Request-Routing Mechanisms , 2002 .

[12]  Lakshminarayanan Subramanian,et al.  An investigation of geographic mapping techniques for internet hosts , 2001, SIGCOMM.