Assessment of the Positioning Accuracy of DGPS and EGNOS Systems in the Bay of Gdansk using Maritime Dynamic Measurements

Differential Global Positioning Systems (DGPS) and the European Geostationary Navigation Overlay Service (EGNOS) are included in a group of supporting systems (Ground-Based Augmentation System (GBAS)/Space-Based Augmentation System (SBAS)) for the American GPS. Their main task is to ensure better positioning characteristics (accuracy, reliability, continuity and availability) compared to GPS. Therefore, they are widely applied wherever GPS failures affect human safety, mainly in aviation, land and marine navigation. The aim of this paper is to assess the predictable positioning accuracy of DGPS and EGNOS receivers using a vessel manoeuvring in the Bay of Gdansk. Two receivers were used in the study: a Simrad MXB5 (DGPS) and a Trimble GA530 (EGNOS), which were simultaneously recording their coordinates. The obtained values were compared with the trajectory computed using a geodetic Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receiver (Trimble R10) connected to a GNSS network, ensuring an accuracy of 2–3 cm (p = 0·95). During a four-hour measurement session, the accuracy statistics of these systems were determined based on around 11,500 positionings. Studies have shown that both positioning systems ensure a similar level of accuracy of their positioning services (approximately 0·5–2 m) and they meet the accuracy requirements set in published standards.

[1]  이영재,et al.  Differential GPS와 응용 , 1994 .

[2]  Improved modelling of the impacts of sea level rise on coastal wetland plant communities , 2016, Hydrobiologia.

[3]  P. G. Remya,et al.  Modelling coastal erosion: A case study of Yarada beach near Visakhapatnam, east coast of India , 2017 .

[4]  Adam Ciecko EGNOS PERFORMANCE MONITORING AT NEWLY ESTABLISHED GNSS STATION IN POLISH AIR FORCE ACADEMY , 2016 .

[5]  M. Kvassay,et al.  Information technology and telecommunication Minimal cut sets and direct partial logic derivatives in reliability analysis , 2014 .

[6]  Donguk Kim,et al.  Accuracy Improvement of DGPS for Low-Cost Single-Frequency Receiver Using Modified Flächen Korrektur Parameter Correction , 2017, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[7]  A. Banachowicz,et al.  Monitoring of Cargo Transport in Urban Areas Using GPS/EGNOS Technologies as Part of the Safety System , 2014 .

[8]  Cezary Specht,et al.  A Method for The Assessing of Reliability Characteristics Relevant to an Assumed Position-Fixing Accuracy in Navigational Positioning Systems , 2016 .

[9]  Leszek Smolarek,et al.  Risk Modelling for Passages in Approach Channel , 2013 .

[10]  Stefan Schlüter,et al.  Assumptions of Full Mission Ship Bridge Simulation Including EGNOS , 2016 .

[11]  Sambor Guze,et al.  The area-dynamic approach to the assessment of the risks of ship collision in the restricted water , 2016 .

[12]  Eric Louette,et al.  European Pathways to Introduce EGNOS and Galileo for Dangerous Goods Transport , 2016 .

[13]  Wei Wang,et al.  M-DGPS: mobile devices supported differential global positioning system algorithm , 2015, Arabian Journal of Geosciences.

[14]  Mariusz Waz,et al.  Precision in Determining Ship Position using the Method of Comparing an Omnidirectional Map to a Visual Shoreline Image , 2015, Journal of Navigation.

[15]  Iho IHO STANDARDS FOR HYDROGRAPHIC SURVEYS , 1998 .

[16]  Cezary Specht,et al.  TESTING ACCURACY OF MARITIME DGPS SYSTEM BASED ON LONG-TERM MEASUREMENTS CAMPAIGNS OVER THE YEARS 2006-2014 , 2014 .

[17]  Paola D'Antonio,et al.  Satellite guidance systems in agriculture: experimental comparison between EZ-Steer/RTK and AUTOPILOT/EGNOS , 2013 .

[18]  Radosław Fellner Analysis of the EGNOS/GNSS Parameters in Selected Aspects of Polish Transport , 2013 .

[19]  Terry Moore,et al.  Is DGPS Still a Good Option for Mariners? , 2001, Journal of Navigation.

[20]  J. Ventura-Traveset,et al.  An Introduction to EGNOS: The European Geostationary Navigation Overlay System , 2015 .

[21]  Andrzej Felski,et al.  Has EGNOS its own place in maritime navigation? , 2015, 2015 International Association of Institutes of Navigation World Congress (IAIN).

[22]  Ya-Jun Pan,et al.  Dgps-Based Localization and Path following Approach for Outdoor wheeled Mobile robots , 2015, Int. J. Robotics Autom..

[23]  G. Retscher Analysis of the System Performance of LADGPS and WADGPS Services in Europe , 2001 .

[24]  Thomas Buchanan,et al.  Flying EGNOS Approaches in the Swiss Alps , 2006, Journal of Navigation.

[25]  Mieczysław Bakuła,et al.  Study of EGNOS accuracy and integrity in eastern Poland , 2016 .

[26]  C. Specht COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF ACTIVE GEODETIC NETWORKS IN POLAND , 2017 .

[27]  B. Whelan,et al.  Precision Agriculture for Grain Production Systems , 2013 .

[28]  Vijay John,et al.  A Map-based Lateral and Longitudinal DGPS/DR Bias Estimation Method for Autonomous Driving , 2017 .

[29]  Cezary Specht,et al.  Position accuracy and fix rate of athletes in location monitoring. , 2016 .

[30]  Ségolène Chaudru,et al.  Impact of the EGNOS feature and environmental conditions on GPS accuracy during outdoor walking , 2017 .

[31]  Ewa Wajszczak,et al.  EGNOS - USE OF GPS SYSTEM FOR APPROACH PROCEDURES , 2013 .

[32]  Changdon Kee,et al.  Position Accuracy Improvement by Implementing the DGNSS-CP Algorithm in Smartphones , 2016, Sensors.

[33]  Torgeir Moan,et al.  Effect of DGPS failures on dynamic positioning of mobile drilling units in the North Sea. , 2009, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[34]  Giancarmine Fasano,et al.  Differential GNSS and Vision-Based Tracking to Improve Navigation Performance in Cooperative Multi-UAV Systems , 2016, Sensors.

[36]  Adam Weintrit,et al.  A History of Maritime Radio-Navigation Positioning Systems used in Poland , 2016, Journal of Navigation.

[37]  Marek Dziewicki,et al.  Position accuracy evaluation of the modernized Polish DGPS , 2009 .

[38]  Miguel Marchamalo,et al.  Geomatics applied to dam safety DGPS real time monitoring , 2013 .