A Game Theoretic Approach to Learning Shape Categories and Contextual Similarities

The search of a model for representing and evaluating the similarities between shapes in a perceptually coherent way is still an open issue. One reason for this is that our perception of similarities is strongly influenced by the underlying category structure. In this paper we aim at jointly learning the categories from examples and the similarity measures related to them. There is a chicken and egg dilemma here: class knowledge is required to determine perceived similarities, while the similarities are needed to extract class knowledge in an unsupervised way. The problem is addressed through a game theoretic approach which allows us to compute 2D shape categories based on a skeletal representation. The approach provides us with both the cluster information needed to extract the categories, and the relevance information needed to compute the category model and, thus, the similarities. Experiments on a database of 1000 shapes showed that the approach outperform other clustering approaches that do not make use of the underlying contextual information and provides similarities comparable with a state-of-the-art label-propagation approach which, however, cannot extract categories.

[1]  Andrew J. Davison,et al.  Active Matching , 2008, ECCV.

[2]  Jörgen W. Weibull,et al.  Evolutionary Game Theory , 1996 .

[3]  Yong Jae Lee,et al.  Foreground Focus: Unsupervised Learning from Partially Matching Images , 2009, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[4]  Anuj Srivastava,et al.  Analysis of planar shapes using geodesic paths on shape spaces , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  Zhuowen Tu,et al.  Improving Shape Retrieval by Learning Graph Transduction , 2008, ECCV.

[6]  Aykut Erdem,et al.  Disconnected Skeleton: Shape at Its Absolute Scale , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  Kaleem Siddiqi,et al.  A shock grammar for recognition , 1996, Proceedings CVPR IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[8]  Baba C. Vemuri,et al.  Geometric Methods in Computer Vision , 1991 .

[9]  Aykut Erdem,et al.  Dissimilarity between two skeletal trees in a context , 2009, Pattern Recognit..

[10]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  The Earth Mover's Distance as a Metric for Image Retrieval , 2000, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[11]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[12]  Alan L. Yuille,et al.  FORMS: A flexible object recognition and modelling system , 1996, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[13]  Benjamin B. Kimia,et al.  Shapes, shocks, and deformations I: The components of two-dimensional shape and the reaction-diffusion space , 1995, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[14]  Sibel Tari,et al.  An axis-based representation for recognition , 2005, Tenth IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV'05) Volume 1.

[15]  Edwin R. Hancock,et al.  Discovering Shape Classes using Tree Edit-Distance and Pairwise Clustering , 2007, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[16]  Andrea Torsello,et al.  Grouping with Asymmetric Affinities: A Game-Theoretic Perspective , 2006, 2006 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'06).

[17]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Normalized cuts and image segmentation , 1997, Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[18]  Timothy F. Cootes,et al.  Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application , 1995, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[19]  Haibin Ling,et al.  Shape Classification Using the Inner-Distance , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[20]  Anil K. Jain,et al.  Algorithms for Clustering Data , 1988 .

[21]  David Mumford,et al.  Mathematical theories of shape: do they model perception? , 1991, Optics & Photonics.

[22]  Daphna Weinshall,et al.  Classification with Nonmetric Distances: Image Retrieval and Class Representation , 2000, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..