Energy, Seismic, and Architectural Renovation of RC Framed Buildings with Prefabricated Timber Panels

In seismic European countries most of the residential building stock is highly energy-intensive and earthquake-prone because it was built before the enforcement of the most recent energy and seismic codes. Furthermore, this stock often shows a low architectural quality due to poor maintenance and/or construction and design deficiencies: for all these reasons, it needs deep renovation, but the use of common energy and seismic upgrading techniques is often unsustainable in terms of costs, work duration, and occupants’ disturbance. Therefore, new integrated, affordable, fast, and low-disruptive renovation actions are strongly needed. This study proposes an innovative energy, seismic, and architectural renovation solution for reinforced concrete (RC) framed buildings, based on the addition of cross-laminated timber (CLT) panels to the outer walls, in combination with wooden-framed panels. The two panels integrate insulation and cladding materials in order to improve the energy performance and the architectural image of the renovated building. Moreover, the CLT panels are connected to the existing RC frame through innovative seismic energy dissipation devices. In case of an earthquake, these devices in combination with the CLT panels reduce the drift demand of the building, preventing or reducing structural damages and consequent repair costs. In particular, this paper investigates the technical feasibility, the energy efficiency, and the architectural enhancement of the proposed retrofitting system. To this purpose, dynamic thermal simulations were conducted on a typical multi-story residential building from the 1960s, located in Catania, Italy. The results indicated that this retrofitting technique considerably improved the energy performance of the selected building, with a reduction of the global energy demand up to nearly 60%. The presented study is part of a larger research project aimed at also investigating, in a further stage, the seismic performance achievable by the above-mentioned renovation solution.

[1]  M. Maheri,et al.  The effects of steel X-brace retrofitting of RC frames on the seismic performance of frames and their elements , 2020 .

[2]  Lorenzo De Stefani,et al.  Development and characterization of a system for the seismic and energy retrofit of existing buildings , 2018 .

[3]  Paolo La Greca,et al.  Seismic and Energy Renovation Measures for Sustainable Cities: A Critical Analysis of the Italian Scenario , 2018 .

[4]  Andrea Belleri,et al.  Does seismic risk affect the environmental impact of existing buildings , 2016 .

[5]  Khaled Galal,et al.  Integrated LCA–LEED sustainability assessment model for structure and envelope systems of school buildings , 2014 .

[6]  Vincenzo Manfredi,et al.  Seismic Strengthening and Energy Efficiency: Towards an Integrated Approach for the Rehabilitation of Existing RC Buildings , 2018 .

[7]  Ezio Giuriani,et al.  Combining seismic retrofit with energy refurbishment for the sustainable renovation of RC buildings: a proof of concept , 2017 .

[8]  Sebastiano D’Urso,et al.  From the Efficiency of Nature to Parametric Design. A Holistic Approach for Sustainable Building Renovation in Seismic Regions , 2019, Sustainability.

[9]  D. Bournas Concurrent seismic and energy retrofitting of RC and masonry building envelopes using inorganic textile-based composites combined with insulation materials: A new concept , 2018, Composites Part B: Engineering.

[10]  Alejandro Martínez-Rocamora,et al.  Building rehabilitation versus demolition and new construction: Economic and environmental assessment , 2017 .

[11]  G. Ulpiani,et al.  The role of areal heat capacity and decrement factor in case of hyper insulated buildings: An experimental study , 2018, Energy and Buildings.

[12]  G. Evola,et al.  Laboratory and In-Situ Measurements for Thermal and Acoustic Performance of Straw Bales , 2019, Sustainability.

[13]  Annarita Ferrante,et al.  A European Project for Safer and Energy Efficient Buildings: Pro-GET-onE (Proactive Synergy of inteGrated Efficient Technologies on Buildings’ Envelopes) , 2018 .

[14]  F. Stazi,et al.  An experimental and numerical study on CLT panels used as infill shear walls for RC buildings retrofit , 2019, Construction and Building Materials.

[15]  D. Bournas,et al.  Textile-reinforced mortar (TRM) versus fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) in shear strengthening of concrete beams , 2015 .

[16]  Anne Power,et al.  Housing and sustainability: demolition or refurbishment? , 2010 .

[17]  Ajay Kumar Singh,et al.  Study of Various Local and Global Seismic Retrofitting Strategies - A Review , 2017 .

[18]  R. Brandner,et al.  Cross laminated timber (CLT): overview and development , 2015, European Journal of Wood and Wood Products.

[19]  Cheuk Lun Chow,et al.  Long term performance and fire safety aspect of FRP composites used in building structures , 2016 .

[20]  G. Evola,et al.  Seismic and Energy Retrofit of Apartment Buildings through Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (AAC) Blocks Infill Walls , 2019, Sustainability.

[21]  Jiping Bai,et al.  Advanced fibre-reinforced polymer (FRP) composites for structural applications , 2013 .

[22]  F. Mazza,et al.  Static vulnerability of an existing r.c. structure and seismic retrofitting by CFRP and base-isolation: A case study , 2016 .