Aerosol loading in the Southeastern United States: reconciling surface and satellite observations

Abstract. We investigate the seasonality in aerosols over the Southeastern United States using observations from several satellite instruments (MODIS, MISR, CALIOP) and surface network sites (IMPROVE, SEARCH, AERONET). We find that the strong summertime enhancement in satellite-observed aerosol optical depth (AOD) (factor 2–3 enhancement over wintertime AOD) is not present in surface mass concentrations (25–55% summertime enhancement). Goldstein et al. (2009) previously attributed this seasonality in AOD to biogenic organic aerosol; however, surface observations show that organic aerosol only accounts for ∼35% of fine particulate matter (smaller than 2.5 μm in aerodynamic diameter, PM2.5) and exhibits similar seasonality to total surface PM2.5. The GEOS-Chem model generally reproduces these surface aerosol measurements, but underrepresents the AOD seasonality observed by satellites. We show that seasonal differences in water uptake cannot sufficiently explain the magnitude of AOD increase. As CALIOP profiles indicate the presence of additional aerosol in the lower troposphere (below 700 hPa), which cannot be explained by vertical mixing, we conclude that the discrepancy is due to a missing source of aerosols above the surface layer in summer.

[1]  Susan Solomon,et al.  Spatial and seasonal patterns in climate change, temperatures, and precipitation across the United States , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[2]  M. Molina,et al.  Secondary organic aerosol formation from anthropogenic air pollution: Rapid and higher than expected , 2006 .

[3]  L. Mona,et al.  One year of CNR-IMAA multi-wavelength Raman lidar measurements in coincidence with CALIPSO overpasses: Level 1 products comparison , 2009 .

[4]  Yuhang Wang,et al.  Assessment of biomass burning emissions and their impacts on urban and regional PM2.5: a Georgia case study. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[5]  R. Martin,et al.  Interannual and seasonal variability of biomass burning emissions constrained by satellite observations , 2003 .

[6]  Alan Fried,et al.  Surface and Lightning Sources of Nitrogen Oxides over the United States: Magnitudes, Chemical Evolution, and Outflow , 2007 .

[7]  M. Petters,et al.  A review of the anthropogenic influence on biogenic secondary organic aerosol , 2011 .

[8]  John H. Seinfeld,et al.  Global modeling of secondary organic aerosol formation from aromatic hydrocarbons: high- vs. low-yield pathways , 2007 .

[9]  W. Malm,et al.  Spatial and seasonal trends in particle concentration and optical extinction in the United States , 1994 .

[10]  David J. Diner,et al.  Retrieval of aerosol properties over land using MISR observations , 2009 .

[11]  D. Winker,et al.  Vertical profiles of aerosol optical properties over central Illinois and comparison with surface and satellite measurements , 2012 .

[12]  E. Edgerton,et al.  Spatial and seasonal variations of fine particle water-soluble organic carbon (WSOC) over the southeastern United States: implications for secondary organic aerosol formation , 2012 .

[13]  E. Vermote,et al.  The MODIS Aerosol Algorithm, Products, and Validation , 2005 .

[14]  Andrew A. Lacis,et al.  Modeling of particle size distribution and its influence on the radiative properties of mineral dust aerosol , 1996 .

[15]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Climatic effects of 1950–2050 changes in US anthropogenic aerosols – Part 1: Aerosol trends and radiative forcing , 2011 .

[16]  W. Malm,et al.  Aerosol physical, chemical and optical properties during the Rocky Mountain Airborne Nitrogen and Sulfur study , 2009 .

[17]  M. McCormick,et al.  Development of global aerosol models using cluster analysis of Aerosol Robotic Network (AERONET) measurements , 2005 .

[18]  David M. Winker,et al.  Assessment of the CALIPSO Lidar 532 nm attenuated backscatter calibration using the NASA LaRC airborne High Spectral Resolution Lidar , 2010 .

[19]  M. Chin,et al.  Natural and transboundary pollution influences on sulfate‐nitrate‐ammonium aerosols in the United States: Implications for policy , 2004 .

[20]  S. Kreidenweis,et al.  Satellite observations cap the atmospheric organic aerosol budget , 2010 .

[21]  Yuhang Wang,et al.  Impacts of prescribed fires on air quality over the Southeastern United States in spring based on modeling and ground/satellite measurements. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[22]  Jassim A. Al-Saadi,et al.  Integrating lidar and satellite optical depth with ambient monitoring for 3-dimensional particulate characterization , 2006 .

[23]  C. Heald,et al.  North African dust export and deposition: A satellite and model perspective , 2012 .

[24]  Naresh Kumar,et al.  Determination of the organic aerosol mass to organic carbon ratio in IMPROVE samples. , 2005, Chemosphere.

[25]  J. Muller,et al.  The value of multiangle measurements for retrieving structurally and radiatively consistent properties of clouds, aerosols, and surfaces , 2005 .

[26]  Joost A. de Gouw,et al.  A study of secondary organic aerosol formation in the anthropogenic-influenced southeastern United States , 2007 .

[27]  C. Heald,et al.  An A-train and model perspective on the vertical distribution of aerosols and CO in the Northern Hemisphere , 2012 .

[28]  D. Balis,et al.  Validation of CALIPSO space-borne-derived attenuated backscatter coefficient profiles using a ground-based lidar in Athens, Greece , 2009 .

[29]  Gerard Capes,et al.  Exploring the vertical profile of atmospheric organic aerosol: comparing 17 aircraft field campaigns with a global model , 2011 .

[30]  R. Martin,et al.  Global and regional decreases in tropospheric oxidants from photochemical effects of aerosols , 2003 .

[31]  R. Weber,et al.  Short-Term Temporal Variation in PM2.5 Mass and Chemical Composition during the Atlanta Supersite Experiment, 1999 , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[32]  D. Winker,et al.  CALIPSO Lidar Description and Performance Assessment , 2009 .

[33]  M. Wesely.  Parameterization of surface resistances to gaseous dry deposition in regional-scale numerical models , 1989 .

[34]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Climatic effects of 1950-2050 changes in US anthropogenic aerosols - Part 2: Climate response , 2011 .

[35]  B. Turpin,et al.  Secondary organic aerosol formation in cloud droplets and aqueous particles (aqSOA): a review of laboratory, field and model studies , 2011 .

[36]  D. Jacob,et al.  Sulfate Formation in Sea-Salt Aerosols: Constraints from Oxygen Isotopes , 2005 .

[37]  G. Hidy,et al.  The Southeastern Aerosol Research and Characterization Study: Part II. Filter-based measurements of fine and coarse particulate matter mass and composition. , 2005, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[38]  Yuhang Wang,et al.  Global simulation of tropospheric O3-NOx-hydrocarbon chemistry: 3. Origin of tropospheric ozone and effects of nonmethane hydrocarbons , 1998 .

[39]  E. J. Alston,et al.  Characterization of atmospheric aerosol in the US Southeast from ground- and space-based measurements over the past decade , 2011 .

[40]  B. Turpin,et al.  Origins of primary and secondary organic aerosol in Atlanta: results of time-resolved measurements during the Atlanta Supersite Experiment. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[41]  David M. Winker,et al.  The CALIPSO mission: spaceborne lidar for observation of aerosols and clouds , 2003, SPIE Asia-Pacific Remote Sensing.

[42]  George M Hidy,et al.  The Southeastern Aerosol Research and Characterization Study, Part 3: Continuous Measurements of Fine Particulate Matter Mass and Composition , 2006, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[43]  D. Jacob,et al.  Constraints from 210Pb and 7Be on wet deposition and transport in a global three‐dimensional chemical tracer model driven by assimilated meteorological fields , 2001 .

[44]  R. Hoff,et al.  The Relation between Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) Aerosol Optical Depth and PM2.5 over the United States: A Geographical Comparison by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Regions , 2009, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[45]  R. Monson,et al.  Response of isoprene emission to ambient CO2 changes and implications for global budgets , 2009 .

[46]  A. Smirnov,et al.  AERONET-a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol Characterization , 1998 .

[47]  Mian Chin,et al.  Sources of carbonaceous aerosols over the United States and implications for natural visibility , 2003 .

[48]  C. Scott,et al.  Weak global sensitivity of cloud condensation nuclei and the aerosol indirect effect to Criegee + SO 2 chemistry , 2012 .

[49]  E. Edgerton,et al.  PM2.5 source apportionment in the southeastern U.S.: Spatial and seasonal variations during 2001-2005 , 2012 .

[50]  B. Holben,et al.  Validation of MODIS aerosol retrieval over ocean , 2002 .

[51]  A. Goldstein,et al.  Biogenic carbon and anthropogenic pollutants combine to form a cooling haze over the southeastern United States , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[52]  Å. Hallquist,et al.  Particle and gaseous emissions from individual diesel and CNG buses , 2012 .

[53]  Mian Chin,et al.  Atmospheric sulfur cycle simulated in the global model GOCART: Comparison with field observations and regional budgets , 2000 .

[54]  Jenise L. Swall,et al.  Determining the spatial and seasonal variability in OM/OC ratios across the US using multiple regression , 2010 .

[55]  A. Goldstein,et al.  Biogenic versus anthropogenic sources of CO in the United States , 2008 .

[56]  G. Hidy,et al.  NMOC, ozone, and organic aerosol in the southeastern United States, 1999-2007: 3. Origins of organic aerosol in Atlanta, Georgia, and surrounding areas , 2011 .

[57]  S. Rao,et al.  Uncertainties in estimating the mixing depth-comparing three mixing-depth models with profiler measurements , 1997 .

[58]  P. Samson,et al.  Comparison of Methods for Estimating Mixing Height Used during the 1992 Atlanta Field Intensive , 1995 .

[59]  D. Jacob,et al.  Synthesis of satellite (MODIS), aircraft (ICARTT), and surface (IMPROVE, EPA‐AQS, AERONET) aerosol observations over eastern North America to improve MODIS aerosol retrievals and constrain surface aerosol concentrations and sources , 2010 .

[60]  Leiming Zhang,et al.  Characterization of the size-segregated water-soluble inorganic ions at eight Canadian rural sites , 2008 .

[61]  Andrey Khlystov,et al.  Ambient aerosol size distributions and number concentrations measured during the Pittsburgh Air Quality Study (PAQS) , 2004 .

[62]  R. Mathur,et al.  CMAQ model performance enhanced when in-cloud secondary organic aerosol is included: comparisons of organic carbon predictions with measurements. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[63]  C. Liousse,et al.  Construction of a 1° × 1° fossil fuel emission data set for carbonaceous aerosol and implementation and radiative impact in the ECHAM4 model , 1999 .

[64]  Daniel J. Jacob,et al.  The impact of transpacific transport of mineral dust in the United States , 2007 .

[65]  J. A. de Gouw,et al.  No evidence for acid-catalyzed secondary organic aerosol formation in power plant plumes over metropolitan Atlanta, Georgia - article no. L06801 , 2007 .

[66]  Simone Tanelli,et al.  CloudSat mission: Performance and early science after the first year of operation , 2008 .

[67]  Yang Liu,et al.  Limitations of Remotely Sensed Aerosol as a Spatial Proxy for Fine Particulate Matter , 2009, Environmental health perspectives.

[68]  D. Winker,et al.  The CALIPSO Automated Aerosol Classification and Lidar Ratio Selection Algorithm , 2009 .

[69]  Mark A. Vaughan,et al.  The Retrieval of Profiles of Particulate Extinction from Cloud-Aerosol Lidar Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) Data: Algorithm Description , 2009 .

[70]  G. Hidy,et al.  The Southeastern Aerosol Research and Characterization Study: Part 1—Overview , 2003, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association.

[71]  Graham Feingold,et al.  On the source of organic acid aerosol layers above clouds. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[72]  Naresh Kumar,et al.  Nitrogen Deposition to the United States: Distribution, Sources, and Processes , 2012 .

[73]  A. Russell,et al.  Roadside, urban, and rural comparison of primary and secondary organic molecular markers in ambient PM2.5. , 2009, Environmental science & technology.

[74]  J. Schauer,et al.  Source apportionment of PM2.5 in the Southeastern United States using solvent-extractable organic compounds as tracers. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[75]  M. Brauer,et al.  Global Estimates of Ambient Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations from Satellite-Based Aerosol Optical Depth: Development and Application , 2010, Environmental health perspectives.

[76]  Lieven Clarisse,et al.  Atmospheric ammonia and particulate inorganic nitrogen over the United States , 2012 .

[77]  E. O'connor,et al.  The CloudSat mission and the A-train: a new dimension of space-based observations of clouds and precipitation , 2002 .

[78]  D. Chu,et al.  Improving National Air Quality Forecasts with Satellite Aerosol Observations , 2005 .

[79]  R. Martin,et al.  Estimating ground-level PM2.5 using aerosol optical depth determined from satellite remote sensing , 2006 .

[80]  Jenny L. Hand,et al.  An examination of the physical and optical properties of aerosols collected in the IMPROVE program , 2007 .

[81]  J. Randerson,et al.  Interannual variability in global biomass burning emissions from 1997 to 2004 , 2006 .

[82]  Rohit Mathur,et al.  A comparison of CMAQ‐based aerosol properties with IMPROVE, MODIS, and AERONET data , 2007 .

[83]  Becky Alexander,et al.  Global distribution of sea salt aerosols: new constraints from in situ and remote sensing observations , 2010 .

[84]  D. Winker,et al.  Overview of the CALIPSO Mission and CALIOP Data Processing Algorithms , 2009 .

[85]  P. Palmer,et al.  Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature) , 2006 .

[86]  Jeffrey S. Reid,et al.  MODIS aerosol product analysis for data assimilation: Assessment of over‐ocean level 2 aerosol optical thickness retrievals , 2006 .

[87]  David M. Winker,et al.  The global 3-D distribution of tropospheric aerosols as characterized by CALIOP , 2012 .

[88]  W. Malm,et al.  Biomass burning smoke aerosol properties measured during Fire Laboratory at Missoula Experiments (FLAME) , 2010 .

[89]  David M. Winker,et al.  The Retrieval of Profiles of Particulate Extinction from Cloud–Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) Data: Uncertainty and Error Sensitivity Analyses , 2013 .

[90]  M. Zheng,et al.  Biomass burning impact on PM 2.5 over the southeastern US during 2007: integrating chemically speciated FRM filter measurements, MODIS fire counts and PMF analysis , 2010 .

[91]  Jenny L. Hand,et al.  Seasonal composition of remote and urban fine particulate matter in the United States , 2012 .

[92]  M. Petters,et al.  A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity , 2006 .