Music Collectivities and MySpace: Towards Digital Collectives

Music collectivities have been changed by the use of digital technologies in terms of more flexibility among participants. This claim is so widely shared, that understanding if and how it makes sense is a difficult but engaging task. Unfortunately, the concepts used to frame music collectivities until now result unsatisfying for their different degrees of fixity. As a theoretical solution, we move to the concept of "digital collective" as considered in reference to the case of music collectivities on the social network site MySpace. We argue that this concept is a starting point for an analysis that focuses on the processes of collective construction, without a priori assumptions on the collectivities. In the example considered, the flexibility of the concept is shown as powerful both in understanding the technological involvement and in relating it to non-technological processes. So, thinking in terms of digital collectives introduces a degree of flexibility, as well as a way to understand stabilized situations, that opens up space for more empirical research.

[1]  M. Maffesoli The Time of the Tribes: The Decline of Individualism in Mass Society , 1995 .

[2]  Barry Shank,et al.  Black Noise: Rap Music and Black Culture in Contemporary America@@@Microphone Fiends: Youth Music and Youth Culture@@@Dissonant Identities: The Rock 'n' Roll Scene in Austin, Texas , 1997 .

[3]  Will Straw,et al.  Systems of articulation, logics of change: Communities and scenes in popular music , 1991 .

[4]  Steven G. Jones Cybersociety 2.0: revisiting computer-mediated communication and community , 1998 .

[5]  Sara Cohen,et al.  Rock Culture in Liverpool: Popular Music in the Making , 1991 .

[6]  D. Hindman The Virtual Community: Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier , 1996 .

[7]  Danah Boyd,et al.  Friends, Friendsters, and Top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites , 2006, First Monday.

[8]  K. Hetherington Stonehenge and Its Festival: Spaces of Consumption , 1992 .

[9]  N. Baym The emergence of on-line community , 1998 .

[10]  E. Durkheim,et al.  De la Division du Travail Social. , 1894 .

[11]  Madeleine Akrich,et al.  The De-scription of Technical Objects , 1992 .

[12]  Patricia R. Webb Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community , 1996 .

[13]  A. Bennett Subcultures or Neo-Tribes? Rethinking the Relationship between Youth, Style and Musical Taste , 1999 .

[14]  Nancy Baym,et al.  The new shape of online community: The example of Swedish independent music fandom , 2007, First Monday.

[15]  Daniel Lewis,et al.  What is web 2.0? , 2006, CROS.

[16]  D. Hesmondhalgh Subcultures, Scenes or Tribes? None of the Above , 2005 .

[17]  B. Joerges Do Politics Have Artefacts? , 1999 .

[18]  ‘So what is the normal amount of bumps allowed in a pit?’: Some Empirical Notes on the (Re)construction of a Youth Music Subculture/Scene , 2007 .