Clinical evaluation of the Crystalens AT‐45 accommodating intraocular lens: Results of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration clinical trial

PURPOSE: To evaluate the 12‐month U.S. phase II clinical trial results of the Crystalens AT‐45 (eyeonics, Inc.) intraocular lens (IOL) used to provide uncorrected distance, intermediate, and near visual acuities in patients having cataract extraction and to compare in a substudy the contrast sensitivity and near visual acuity in patients with the Crystalens AT‐45 IOL and those receiving a standard IOL. SETTING: Fourteen clinical sites throughout the U.S. for efficacy and 3 non‐U.S. sites for safety and efficacy. METHODS: Patients 50 years or older had small‐incision cataract extraction with implantation of the Crystalens AT‐45 IOL. Unilateral implantation was followed by fellow‐eye implantation. Postoperatively, uncorrected distance, near, and intermediate visual acuities were determined. Near and intermediate visual acuities were tested through a distance correction to eliminate potential pseudoaccommodative effects of residual myopia and corneal cylinder. A substudy tested contrast sensitivity under mesopic conditions with and without glare, as well as visual acuity in a subset of Crystalens AT‐45 patients and a control group receiving a standard IOL. RESULTS: A total of 263 patients participated in the U.S. clinical trial and had 1 year of follow‐up. Near visual acuities through the distance correction of 20/40 (J3) or better, monocularly and bilaterally, respectively, were seen in 90.1% and 100%; intermediate near visual acuities were seen in 99.6% and 100%. More than half the bilaterally implanted Crystalens AT‐45 patients achieved uncorrected near acuity of 20/25 (J1) or better through the distance correction, and 84% achieved 20/32 (J2) or better. In the substudy, monocular near vision through the distance correction of 20/25 (J1) or better was seen in 50.4% with the Crystalens AT‐45 IOL and in 4.7% with the standard IOLs. Mesopic contrast sensitivity results with and without glare for the Crystalens AT‐45 were similar to those with standard monofocal IOLs. Nearly all patients (74 patients; 97.3%) who bilaterally were within 0.50 diopter of plano postoperatively achieved 20/32 (J2) or better uncorrected near, intermediate, and distance visual acuities. CONCLUSIONS: The Crystalens AT‐45 accommodating IOL provided good uncorrected near, intermediate, and distance vision in pseudophakic patients. Contrast sensitivity with the Crystalens AT‐45 was not diminished relative to standard monofocal IOLs, and near and intermediate visual performance was significantly better than with standard IOLs.

[1]  J Wollensak,et al.  Comparison of a diffractive bifocal and a monofocal intraocular lens , 1996, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[2]  J R Bloomfield,et al.  Driving simulation study: bilateral array multifocal versus bilateral AMO monofocal intraocular lenses. , 1999, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[3]  J S Cumming,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the model AT-45 silicone accommodating intraocular lens: results of feasibility and the initial phase of a Food and Drug Administration clinical trial. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[4]  D. G. Green,et al.  Monocular versus Binocular Visual Acuity , 1965, Nature.

[5]  C. Skorpik,et al.  Plate‐haptic silicone intraocular lens implantation: long‐term results , 2002, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[6]  Coleman Dj,et al.  On the hydraulic suspension theory of accommodation. , 1986 .

[7]  R. Superstein,et al.  Glare disability and contrast sensitivity before and after cataract surgery , 1997, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[8]  R. Steinert,et al.  A prospective comparative study of the AMO ARRAY zonal-progressive multifocal silicone intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens. , 1999, Ophthalmology.

[9]  C. T. Post,et al.  Comparison of depth of focus and low-contrast acuities for monofocal versus multifocal intraocular lens patients at 1 year. , 1992, Ophthalmology.

[10]  M. Lyall,et al.  Diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implants for unilateral cataracts in prepresbyopic patients. , 1992, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[11]  Stuart J. Cumming Postoperative complications and uncorrected acuities after implantation of plate haptic silicone and three‐piece silicone intraocular lenses , 1993, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[12]  J. Colin Clinical results of implanting a silicone haptic‐anchor‐plate intraocular lens , 1996, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[13]  Stuart J. Cumming,et al.  Experience with an Accommodating IOL , 1996, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[14]  S. Greenbaum Monovision pseudophakia , 2002, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[15]  J L Semmlow,et al.  Age-related changes in human ciliary muscle and lens: a magnetic resonance imaging study. , 1999, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  D J Coleman,et al.  On the hydraulic suspension theory of accommodation. , 1986, Transactions of the American Ophthalmological Society.

[17]  R. Lindstrom,et al.  Food and Drug Administration study update. One-year results from 671 patients with the 3M multifocal intraocular lens. , 1993, Ophthalmology.

[18]  B. Frémont,et al.  SUMMARY OF SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS DATA , 2002 .

[19]  S. Jain,et al.  Monovision outcomes in presbyopic individuals after refractive surgery. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[20]  R. H. Keates,et al.  Small‐diameter corneal inlay in presbyopic or pseudophakic patients , 1995, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[21]  M. Snead,et al.  Pseudophakic accommodation? A study of the stability of capsular bag supported, one piece, rigid tripod, or soft flexible implants. , 1990, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[22]  M E Sloane,et al.  Aging and luminance-adaptation effects on spatial contrast sensitivity. , 1988, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[23]  M. Knorz,et al.  Effect of pupil size and astigmatism on contrast acuity with monofocal and bifocal intraocular lenses , 1994, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[24]  J. Kammann,et al.  Vitreous‐stabilizing, single‐piece, mini‐loop, plate‐haptic silicone intraocular lens , 1998, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[25]  M. Campbell,et al.  Biometric, optical and physical changes in the isolated human crystalline lens with age in relation to presbyopia , 1999, Vision Research.

[26]  D. Apple,et al.  Eradication of posterior capsule opacification: documentation of a marked decrease in Nd:YAG laser posterior capsulotomy rates noted in an analysis of 5416 pseudophakic human eyes obtained postmortem. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[27]  J. Cumming,et al.  The Measurement of Vitreous Cavity Length and its Comparison Pre- and Postoperatively* , 1994 .

[28]  Presbyopia: A Surgical Textbook , 2003 .