MRSI data unmixing using spatial and spectral priors in transformed domains

In high-grade gliomas, the tumor boundaries and the degree of infiltration are difficult to define due to their heterogeneous composition and diffuse growth pattern. Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging (MRSI) is a non-invasive technique able to provide information on brain tumor biology not available from conventional anatomical imaging. In this paper we propose a blind source separation (BSS) algorithm for brain tissue classification and visualization of tumor spread using MRSI data. The proposed algorithm imposes relaxed non-negativity in the direct domain along with spatial-spectral regularizations in a transformed domain. The optimization problem is efficiently solved in a two-step approach using the concept of proximity operators. Vertex component analysis (VCA) is proposed to estimate the number of sources. Comparisons with state-of-the-art BSS algorithms on in-vivo MRSI data show the efficiency of the proposed algorithm. The presented method provides patterns that can easily be related to a specific tissue (normal, tumor, necrosis, hypoxia, edema or infiltration). Unlike other BSS methods dedicated to MRSI data, it can handle spectra with negative peaks and results are not sensitive to the initialization strategy. In addition, it is robust against noisy or bad-quality spectra.

[1]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization , 1999, Nature.

[2]  G Tedeschi,et al.  High-field proton MRS of human brain. , 2003, European journal of radiology.

[3]  Thomas Filleron,et al.  Evaluation of the lactate-to-N-acetyl-aspartate ratio defined with magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging before radiation therapy as a new predictive marker of the site of relapse in patients with glioblastoma multiforme. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[4]  M Leonardi,et al.  Metabolic Findings on 3T 1H-MR Spectroscopy in Peritumoral Brain Edema , 2007, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[5]  Sabine Van Huffel,et al.  Hierarchical non‐negative matrix factorization (hNMF): a tissue pattern differentiation method for glioblastoma multiforme diagnosis using MRSI , 2013, NMR in biomedicine.

[6]  P. L. Combettes,et al.  A proximal decomposition method for solving convex variational inverse problems , 2008, 0807.2617.

[7]  Amel Benazza-Benyahia,et al.  A wavelet-based regularized reconstruction algorithm for SENSE parallel MRI with applications to neuroimaging , 2011, Medical Image Anal..

[8]  Nicolas Gillis,et al.  Sparse nonnegative matrix underapproximation and its application to hyperspectral image analysis , 2013 .

[9]  José M. Bioucas-Dias,et al.  Vertex component analysis: a fast algorithm to unmix hyperspectral data , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[10]  Nicolas Gillis,et al.  Accelerated Multiplicative Updates and Hierarchical ALS Algorithms for Nonnegative Matrix Factorization , 2011, Neural Computation.

[11]  Paulo J. G. Lisboa,et al.  Convex Non-Negative Matrix Factorization for Brain Tumor Delimitation from MRSI Data , 2012, PloS one.

[12]  Lucas C. Parra,et al.  Nonnegative matrix factorization for rapid recovery of constituent spectra in magnetic resonance chemical shift imaging of the brain , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[13]  Mohamed-Jalal Fadili,et al.  A Generalized Forward-Backward Splitting , 2011, SIAM J. Imaging Sci..

[14]  S. Van Huffel,et al.  Different quantification algorithms may lead to different results: a comparison using proton MRS lipid signals , 2014, NMR in biomedicine.

[15]  J. Moreau Proximité et dualité dans un espace hilbertien , 1965 .

[16]  Nicolas Gillis,et al.  Sparse nonnegative matrix underapproximation and its application to hyperspectral image analysis , 2011, 2011 3rd Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS).