Experimental and computational approach for the evaluation of the biomechanical effects of dental bridge misfit.

Dental bridges supported by osseointegrated implants are commonly used to treat the partially or completely edentulous jaw. The bridges are manufactured in metal alloy using a sequence of technological steps which well match the requirement to get custom overstructures but does not guarantee geometrical and dimensional tolerances. Dentists often experience that a perfect fit of the bridge with the abutments is almost impossible to achieve. When a misfitting bridge is forced on the abutments, deformations may occur inducing a permanent preload at the fixture-bone interface and the greater the misfit the greater is the preload and the risk of implant failure. This work gives an evaluation of the biomechanical effects induced by a misfitting bridge when forced on two supporting dental implants. The strains induced in the bridge have been measured using two purposely designed and fabricated experimental devices allowing different types of misfit. FEM 3D models of the bridge and of the bridge anchored to the bone by implants have been developed. The former has been validated by simulating the same loading conditions as in the experimental tests and comparing the bridge strains. Both models have been used for the evaluation of the stress induced in the bridge and at the fixture-bone interface by bridge length errors. The results show that the method may help to estimate the stress distribution in the bridge and bone as a consequence of different dental bridge misfits.

[1]  T. Albrektsson,et al.  State of the art in oral implants. , 1991, Journal of clinical periodontology.

[2]  T Jemt,et al.  In vivo load measurements on osseointegrated implants supporting fixed or removable prostheses: a comparative pilot study. , 1991, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[3]  T Albrektsson,et al.  A multicenter report on osseointegrated oral implants. , 1988, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[4]  T Jemt,et al.  In vivo measurements of precision of fit involving implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[5]  D Assif,et al.  Accuracy of implant impression techniques. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[6]  J I Nicholls,et al.  Tolerance measurements of various implant components. , 1997, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[7]  T Jemt,et al.  Failures and complications in 127 consecutively placed fixed partial prostheses supported by Brånemark implants: from prosthetic treatment to first annual checkup. , 1992, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[8]  Ignace Naert,et al.  P073 In vivo quantification of preload as a consequence of tightening a fixed oral prosthesis on oral implants , 1998 .

[9]  N. Clelland,et al.  Comparison of strains produced in a bone simulant between conventional cast and resin-luted implant frameworks. , 1997, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[10]  S. Glantz,et al.  On the influence of superstructure connection on implant preload: a methodological and clinical study. , 1996, Clinical oral implants research.

[11]  T Jemt,et al.  Three-dimensional distortion of gold alloy castings and welded titanium frameworks. Measurements of the precision of fit between completed implant prostheses and the master casts in routine edentulous situations. , 1995, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[12]  T Jemt,et al.  Photogrammetric measurements of implant positions. Description of a technique to determine the fit between implants and superstructures. , 1994, Clinical oral implants research.

[13]  D. van Steenberghe,et al.  A retrospective multicenter evaluation of the survival rate of osseointegrated fixtures supporting fixed partial prostheses in the treatment of partial edentulism. , 1989, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[14]  Roberto Contro,et al.  P067 Evaluation of the biomechanical effects of the dimensional mismatches between dental bridges and supporting implants , 1998 .

[15]  T. Jemt,et al.  Accuracy of implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw: analysis of precision of fit between cast gold-alloy frameworks and master casts by means of a three-dimensional photogrammetric technique. , 1995, Clinical oral implants research.

[16]  T Jemt,et al.  Prosthesis misfit and marginal bone loss in edentulous implant patients. , 1996, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.

[17]  T. Jemt Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. , 1992, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.