How range residency and long-range perception change encounter rates
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] J. O’Dwyer. Beyond an ecological ideal gas law , 2019, Nature Ecology & Evolution.
[2] Andrew M. Hein,et al. Information limitation and the dynamics of coupled ecological systems , 2019, Nature Ecology & Evolution.
[3] Orr Spiegel,et al. A comprehensive analysis of autocorrelation and bias in home range estimation , 2019, Ecological Monographs.
[4] Justine L Atkins,et al. Cascading impacts of large-carnivore extirpation in an African ecosystem , 2019, Science.
[5] E. Brigatti,et al. Lévy like patterns in the small-scale movements of marsupials in an unfamiliar and risky environment , 2019, Scientific Reports.
[6] R. Martínez-García,et al. Spatial eco-evolutionary feedbacks mediate coexistence in prey-predator systems , 2019, Scientific Reports.
[7] Kevin Winner,et al. Statistical inference for home range overlap , 2018, Methods in Ecology and Evolution.
[8] P. Pellikka,et al. A call for viewshed ecology: Advancing our understanding of the ecology of information through viewshed analysis , 2017 .
[9] Theresa Burt de Perera,et al. Sensory influence on navigation in the weakly electric fish Gnathonemus petersii , 2017, Animal Behaviour.
[10] Scott A. McKinley,et al. Resource-driven encounters among consumers and implications for the spread of infectious disease , 2017, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.
[11] Daniel Sheldon,et al. Kálmán filters for continuous-time movement models , 2017, Ecol. Informatics.
[12] Christen H. Fleming,et al. A new kernel density estimator for accurate home‐range and species‐range area estimation , 2017 .
[13] Sharon Bewick,et al. Perceptual Ranges, Information Gathering, and Foraging Success in Dynamic Landscapes , 2017, The American Naturalist.
[14] Brett T. McClintock,et al. Animal Movement: Statistical Models for Telemetry Data , 2017 .
[15] Luis F. Gordillo,et al. Mass action in two-sex population models: encounters, mating encounters and the associated numerical correction , 2017 .
[16] Justin M. Calabrese,et al. Online games: a novel approach to explore how partial information influences human random searches , 2016, Scientific Reports.
[17] Greg A Breed,et al. Predicting animal home-range structure and transitions using a multistate Ornstein-Uhlenbeck biased random walk. , 2017, Ecology.
[18] Rebecca C. Tyson,et al. First capture success in two dimensions: The search for prey by a random walk predator in a comprehensive space of random walks , 2016 .
[19] Matthieu Barbier,et al. The Spatial Dynamics of Predators and the Benefits and Costs of Sharing Information , 2016, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[20] R. Kays,et al. Terrestrial animal tracking as an eye on life and planet , 2015, Science.
[21] C H Fleming,et al. Rigorous home range estimation with movement data: a new autocorrelated kernel density estimator. , 2015, Ecology.
[22] J. F. Benson,et al. Spatial overlap, proximity, and habitat use of individual wolves within the same packs , 2015 .
[23] G. Pyke. Understanding movements of organisms: it's time to abandon the Lévy foraging hypothesis , 2015 .
[24] F. Vázquez,et al. Optimal recruitment strategies for groups of interacting walkers with leaders. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[25] Frederic Bartumeus,et al. Stochastic Optimal Foraging: Tuning Intensive and Extensive Dynamics in Random Searches , 2014, PloS one.
[26] Peter Leimgruber,et al. Non‐Markovian maximum likelihood estimation of autocorrelated movement processes , 2014 .
[27] Peter Leimgruber,et al. From Fine-Scale Foraging to Home Ranges: A Semivariance Approach to Identifying Movement Modes across Spatiotemporal Scales , 2014, The American Naturalist.
[28] M. Lewis,et al. A unifying framework for quantifying the nature of animal interactions , 2014, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.
[29] Cristóbal López,et al. Optimal search in interacting populations: Gaussian jumps versus Lévy flights. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.
[30] Andrew M. Hein,et al. Sensory Information and Encounter Rates of Interacting Species , 2013, PLoS Comput. Biol..
[31] S. Levin,et al. Diffusion and Ecological Problems: Modern Perspectives , 2013 .
[32] F. Barraquand,et al. Scaling up predator–prey dynamics using spatial moment equations , 2013 .
[33] P. Turchin. Complex Population Dynamics: A Theoretical/Empirical Synthesis , 2013 .
[34] Mark A. Lewis,et al. Mechanistic Home Range Analysis. (MPB-43) , 2013 .
[35] Cristóbal López,et al. Optimizing the search for resources by sharing information: Mongolian gazelles as a case study. , 2013, Physical review letters.
[36] Justin P. Coon,et al. An Approximation of the First Order Marcum Q-Function with Application to Network Connectivity Analysis , 2012, IEEE Communications Letters.
[37] Luca Giuggioli,et al. Encounter times in overlapping domains: application to epidemic spread in a population of territorial animals. , 2012, Physical review letters.
[38] Eliezer Gurarie,et al. Towards a general formalization of encounter rates in ecology , 2013, Theoretical Ecology.
[39] Robert J. Jr. Fletcher,et al. Signal detection theory clarifies the concept of perceptual range and its relevance to landscape connectivity , 2012, Landscape Ecology.
[40] Eliezer Gurarie,et al. Characteristic Spatial and Temporal Scales Unify Models of Animal Movement , 2011, The American Naturalist.
[41] A. Dieker. Reflected Brownian Motion , 2011 .
[42] J. Prevedello,et al. Movement behaviour within and beyond perceptual ranges in three small mammals: effects of matrix type and body mass. , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.
[43] Håkan Sand,et al. Building a mechanistic understanding of predation with GPS-based movement data , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[44] Jacqueline L. Frair,et al. Building the bridge between animal movement and population dynamics , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[45] F. Cagnacci,et al. Animal ecology meets GPS-based radiotelemetry: a perfect storm of opportunities and challenges , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[46] Francesca Cagnacci,et al. The home-range concept: are traditional estimators still relevant with modern telemetry technology? , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[47] H. Olff,et al. How well do food distributions predict spatial distributions of shorebirds with different degrees of self-organization? , 2010, The Journal of animal ecology.
[48] F. D. L. Torre,et al. Designing a Metric for the Difference between Gaussian Densities , 2010 .
[49] C. Hawkes,et al. Linking movement behaviour, dispersal and population processes: is individual variation a key? , 2009, The Journal of animal ecology.
[50] M. Lewis,et al. First Passage Time Analysis of Animal Movement and Insights into the Functional Response , 2009, Bulletin of mathematical biology.
[51] E. Revilla,et al. A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[52] J. Calabrese,et al. Reproductive asynchrony in natural butterfly populations and its consequences for female matelessness. , 2008, The Journal of animal ecology.
[53] William F. Fagan,et al. Search and navigation in dynamic environments – from individual behaviors to population distributions , 2008 .
[54] André W. Visser,et al. Lagrangian modelling of plankton motion: From deceptively simple random walks to Fokker–Planck and back again , 2008 .
[55] O. Ovaskainen,et al. State-space models of individual animal movement. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[56] J. Hutchinson,et al. Use, misuse and extensions of “ideal gas” models of animal encounter , 2007, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.
[57] John Fieberg,et al. Kernel density estimators of home range: smoothing and the autocorrelation red herring. , 2007, Ecology.
[58] André W. Visser,et al. Plankton motility patterns and encounter rates , 2006, Oecologia.
[59] P. Moorcroft,et al. Mechanistic home range analysis , 2006 .
[60] B. Godley,et al. Satellite Tracking and Analysis Tool (STAT): an integrated system for archiving, analyzing and mapping animal tracking data , 2005 .
[61] JOHN FIEBERG,et al. QUANTIFYING HOME-RANGE OVERLAP: THE IMPORTANCE OF THE UTILIZATION DISTRIBUTION , 2005 .
[62] Mark Hebblewhite,et al. Spatial decomposition of predation risk using resource selection functions: an example in a wolf /elk predator /prey system , 2005 .
[63] R. García-Pelayo. Distribution of distance in the spheroid , 2005 .
[64] Bruce A. Pond,et al. Allowing for redundancy and environmental effects in estimates of home range utilization distributions , 2005 .
[65] Patrick A. Zollner,et al. Comparing the landscape level perceptual abilities of forest sciurids in fragmented agricultural landscapes* , 2000, Landscape Ecology.
[66] Frederic Bartumeus,et al. Erratum: Optimizing the Encounter Rate in Biological Interactions: Lévy versus Brownian Strategies [Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 097901 (2002)] , 2002 .
[67] Patrick A. Zollner,et al. Using body size to predict perceptual range , 2002 .
[68] F Bartumeus,et al. Optimizing the encounter rate in biological interactions: Lévy versus Brownian strategies. , 2002, Physical review letters.
[69] Rick Durrett,et al. Stochastic Spatial Models , 1999, SIAM Rev..
[70] Paul G. Blackwell,et al. Random diffusion models for animal movement , 1997 .
[71] S. L. Lima,et al. Landscape-level perceptual abilities in white-footed mice : perceptual range and the detection of forested habitat , 1997 .
[72] Alan A. Berryman,et al. The Orgins and Evolution of Predator‐Prey Theory , 1992 .
[73] Stephen Harris,et al. Home‐range analysis using radio‐tracking data–a review of problems and techniques particularly as applied to the study of mammals , 1990 .
[74] B. Worton. Kernel methods for estimating the utilization distribution in home-range studies , 1989 .
[75] B. J. Worton,et al. A review of models of home range for animal movement , 1987 .
[76] J. Harrison,et al. The Stationary Distribution of Reflected Brownian Motion in a Planar Region , 1985 .
[77] W. Bowen. Home Range and Spatial Organization of Coyotes in Jasper National Park, Alberta , 1982 .
[78] K. Dixon,et al. Harmonic mean measure of animal activity areas , 1980 .
[79] J. Gerritsen,et al. Encounter Probabilities and Community Structure in Zooplankton: a Mathematical Model , 1977 .
[80] William W. Murdoch,et al. Functional Response and Stability in Predator-Prey Systems , 1975, The American Naturalist.
[81] R. Jennrich,et al. Measurement of non-circular home range. , 1969, Journal of theoretical biology.
[82] C. S. Holling. The Components of Predation as Revealed by a Study of Small-Mammal Predation of the European Pine Sawfly , 1959, The Canadian Entomologist.
[83] Morikazu Toda. On the Theory of the Brownian Motion , 1958 .
[84] J. Mosimann. THE EVOLUTIONARY SIGNIFICANCE OF RARE MATINGS IN ANIMAL POPULATIONS , 1958 .
[85] Eugene P. Odum,et al. Measurement of territory and home range size in birds , 1955 .
[86] W. H. Burt. Territoriality and Home Range Concepts as Applied to Mammals , 1943 .
[87] HighWire Press. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Containing papers of a mathematical and physical character , 1934 .
[88] G. Uhlenbeck,et al. On the Theory of the Brownian Motion , 1930 .
[89] W. O. Kermack,et al. A contribution to the mathematical theory of epidemics , 1927 .
[90] A. J. Lotka. Elements of Physical Biology. , 1925, Nature.
[91] P. Verhulst. Notice sur la loi que la population pursuit dans son accroissement , 1838 .