Teacher design in teams as a professional development arrangement for developing technology integration knowledge and skills of science teachers in Tanzania

This study investigated the impact of teacher design teams as a professional development arrangement for developing technology integration knowledge and skills among in-service science teachers. The study was conducted at a secondary school in Tanzania, where 12 in-service science teachers participated in a workshop about technology integration in science teaching and worked in design teams to prepare technology-enhanced biology, chemistry and physics lessons. Through collaboration in design teams, teachers were able to make science animations using PowerPoint and record videos to use in their teaching. The designed lessons were taught in the classroom and reflected upon thereafter by all teachers. In order to determine the change in teachers’ technology integration knowledge and skills, data were collected before and after the professional development arrangement by using questionnaire, interview and observation data. Focus group discussion and reflection questionnaire data were used to assess teachers’ experience of working in design teams at the end of the professional development arrangement. Findings showed an increase in teachers’ technology integration knowledge and skills between pre- and post-measurements. Collaboration in design teams had the potential for teachers to share knowledge, skills, experience and challenges related to technology-enhanced teaching.

[1]  B MilesMatthew,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis , 2009, Approaches and Processes of Social Science Research.

[2]  M. Bakah.  Teacher professional development through collaborative curriculum design in Ghana's polytechnics , 2011 .

[3]  Petra Fisser,et al.  ICT integration through design teams in science teacher preparation , 2011, Int. J. Learn. Technol..

[4]  Adam Handelzalts,et al.  Collaborative curriculum development in teacher design teams , 2009 .

[5]  Ralph T. Putnam,et al.  What Do New Views of Knowledge and Thinking Have to Say About Research on Teacher Learning? , 2000 .

[6]  K. Seers.  Qualitative data analysis , 2011, Evidence Based Nursing.

[7]  Murat Peker.  The use of expanded microteaching for reducing pre- service teachers' teaching anxiety about mathematics , 2009 .

[8]  Mark J. Hofer,et al.  Testing a TPACK-Based Technology Integration Assessment Rubric , 2010 .

[9]  Margaret L. Niess,et al.  Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. , 2005 .

[10]  Christine Nadel,et al.  Case Study Research Design And Methods , 2016 .

[11]  Glen Farrell and Shafika Isaacs and Michael Trucano.  Survey of ICT and Education in Africa. Volume 2: 53 Country Reports , 2007 .

[12]  S. Kitta.  Enhancing mathematics teachers' pedagogical content knowledge and skills in Tanzania , 2004 .

[13]  Joke Voogt,et al.  Science Teacher Learning of MBL-Supported Student-Centered Science Education in the Context of Secondary Education in Tanzania , 2009 .

[14]  Charoula Angeli,et al.  Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK) , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[15]  Gregory R. MacKinnon.  Preparing Preservice Teachers to Integrate Technology: A Longitudinal Study , 2010 .

[16]  Judi Harris,et al.  What Is Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2009 .

[17]  Margaret L. Niess,et al.  Mathematics Teacher TPACK Standards and Development Model , 2009 .

[18]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  What Happens When Teachers Design Educational Technology? The Development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge , 2005 .

[19]  J. Voogt,et al.  Developing technological pedagogical content knowledge in pre-service mathematics teachers through collaborative design , 2012 .

[20]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: Integrating content, pedagogy and technology , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[21]  A. Viera,et al.  Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. , 2005, Family medicine.

[22]  Charles R. Graham,et al.  TPACK Development in Science Teaching: Measuring the TPACK Confidence of Inservice Science Teachers , 2009 .

[23]  H. Borko,et al.  Growing Talent , 2009 .

[24]  Joke Voogt,et al.  E-learning course design in teacher design teams: experiences in the Open University of Tanzania , 2009, Int. J. Learn. Technol..

[25]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) , 2009 .

[26]  Robert F. DeVellis,et al.  Scale Development: Theory and Applications. , 1992 .

[27]  Johan van Braak,et al.  Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[28]  Frank Nicodem Tilya,et al.  Teacher support for the use of MBL in activity-based physics teaching in Tanzania , 2003 .

[29]  J. Voogt,et al.  Teacher Learning in Collaborative Curriculum Design. , 2011 .

[30]  Matthew J. Koehler,et al.  Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge , 2006, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[31]  V A Thurmond,et al.  The point of triangulation. , 2001, Journal of nursing scholarship : an official publication of Sigma Theta Tau International Honor Society of Nursing.

[32]  Jan van den Akker,et al.  The teacher as learner in curriculum implementation , 1988 .

[33]  Geert Kelchtermans,et al.  Collaborative Curriculum Development: an encounter of different professional knowledge systems , 1996 .

[34]  Margaret L. Niess.  Preparing Teachers to Teach Science and Mathematics with Technology , 2001 .

[35]  Athanassios Jimoyiannis,et al.  Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development , 2010, Comput. Educ..