Temporal variability of aerosol properties during TCAP: impact on radiative forcing

Ground-based remote sensing and in situ observations of aerosol microphysical and optical properties have been collected during summertime (June-August, 2012) as part of the Two-Column Aerosol Project (TCAP; http://campaign.arm.gov/tcap/), which was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE’s) Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Program (http://www.arm.gov/). The overall goal of the TCAP field campaign is to study the evolution of optical and microphysical properties of atmospheric aerosol transported from North America to the Atlantic and their impact on the radiation energy budget. During TCAP, the ground-based ARM Mobile Facility (AMF) was deployed on Cape Cod, an arm-shaped peninsula situated on the easternmost portion of Massachusetts (along the east coast of the United States) and that is generally downwind of large metropolitan areas. The AMF site was equipped with numerous instruments for sampling aerosol, cloud and radiative properties, including a Multi-Filter Rotating Shadowband Radiometer (MFRSR), a Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer (SMPS), an Aerodynamic Particle Sizer (APS), and a three-wavelength nephelometer. In this study we present an analysis of diurnal and day-to-day variability of the column and near-surface aerosol properties obtained from remote sensing (MFRSR data) and ground-based in situ measurements (SMPS, APS, and nephelometer data). In particular, we show that the observed diurnal variability of the MFRSR aerosol optical depth is strong and comparable with that obtained previously from the AERONET climatology in Mexico City, which has a larger aerosol loading. Moreover, we illustrate how the variability of aerosol properties impacts the direct aerosol radiative forcing at different time scales.

[1]  Alexander Smirnov,et al.  Diurnal variability of aerosol optical depth observed at AERONET (Aerosol Robotic Network) sites , 2002 .

[2]  T. Eck,et al.  Variability of Absorption and Optical Properties of Key Aerosol Types Observed in Worldwide Locations , 2002 .

[3]  Connor J. Flynn,et al.  Aerosol single-scattering albedo and asymmetry parameter from MFRSR observations during the ARM Aerosol IOP 2003 , 2006 .

[4]  Richard Ferrare,et al.  Multi-year satellite and surface observations of AOD in support of two-column aerosol project (TCAP) field campaign , 2012, Remote Sensing.

[5]  Catherine Gautier,et al.  SBDART: A Research and Teaching Software Tool for Plane-Parallel Radiative Transfer in the Earth's Atmosphere. , 1998 .

[6]  Yoram J. Kaufman,et al.  Shortwave aerosol radiative forcing over cloud‐free oceans from Terra: 2. Seasonal and global distributions , 2005 .

[7]  Connor Flynn,et al.  Climatology of aerosol optical depth in north-central Oklahoma: 1992-2008 , 2010 .

[8]  Lorraine A. Remer,et al.  MODIS 3 km aerosol product: algorithm and global perspective , 2013 .

[9]  A. Smirnov,et al.  AERONET-a federated instrument network and data archive for aerosol Characterization , 1998 .

[10]  Beat Schmid,et al.  Direct aerosol forcing: Calculation from observables and sensitivities to inputs , 2006 .

[11]  Alexander Smirnov,et al.  Aerosol daytime variations over North and South America derived from multiyear AERONET measurements , 2012 .

[12]  Michael Schulz,et al.  Radiative forcing by aerosols as derived from the AeroCom present-day and pre-industrial simulations , 2006 .

[13]  Alexander Smirnov,et al.  Aeronet's Version 2.0 quality assurance criteria , 2006, SPIE Asia-Pacific Remote Sensing.