Understanding the Acoustic Oscillations Observed in the Injection Rate of a Common-Rail Direct Injection Diesel Injector

Measuring the rate of injection of a common-rail injector is one of the first steps for diesel engine development. The injected quantity as a function of time is of prime interest for engine research and modeling activities, as it drives spray development and mixing, which, in current diesel engines, control combustion. On the other hand, the widely used long-tube method provides results that are neither straightforward nor fully understood. This study, performed on a 0.09-mm axially drilled single-hole nozzle, is part of the Engine Combustion Network (ECN) and aims at analyzing the acoustic oscillations observed in the rate of injection signal and measuring their impact on the real injection process and on the results recorded by the experimental devices. Several tests have been carried out for this study, including rate of injection and momentum, X-ray phase-contrast of the injector, and needle motion or injector displacement. The acoustic analysis revealed that these fluctuations found their origin in the sac of the injector and that they were the results of an interaction between the fluid in the chamber (generally gases) or in the nozzle sac and the liquid fuel to be injected. It has been observed that the relatively high oscillations recorded by the long-tube method were mainly caused by a displacement of the injector itself while injecting. In addition, the results showed that these acoustic features are also present in the spray, which means that the oscillations make it out of the injector, and that this temporal variation must be reflected in the actual rate of injection.

[1]  V. Macian,et al.  New technique for determination of internal geometry of a diesel nozzle with the use of silicone methodology , 2003 .

[2]  Raul Payri,et al.  The effect of temperature and pressure on thermodynamic properties of diesel and biodiesel fuels , 2011 .

[3]  D. Potz,et al.  Diesel Nozzle — The Determining Interface Between Injection System And Combustion Chamber , 2002 .

[4]  Caroline L. Genzale,et al.  Comparison of Diesel Spray Combustion in Different High-Temperature, High-Pressure Facilities , 2010 .

[5]  E. Markland,et al.  Discharge Coefficients for Incompressible Non-Cavitating Flow through Long Orifices , 1965 .

[6]  Raul Payri,et al.  Diesel Injection System Modelling. Methodology and Application for a First-generation Common Rail System , 2004 .

[7]  P. D. McCORMACK,et al.  The effect of mechanical vibration on the break-up of a cylindrical water jet in air , 1964 .

[8]  M. Musculus Entrainment waves in decelerating transient turbulent jets , 2009, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  F. J. Salvador,et al.  Using spray momentum flux measurements to understand the influence of diesel nozzle geometry on spray characteristics , 2005 .

[10]  Christopher F. Powell,et al.  The Effects of Diesel Injector Needle Motion on Spray Structure , 2009 .

[11]  Raul Payri,et al.  Study of cavitation phenomena based on a technique for visualizing bubbles in a liquid pressurized chamber , 2009 .

[12]  Christopher F. Powell,et al.  X-ray radiography measurements of diesel spray structure at engine-like ambient density. , 2009 .

[13]  Raul Payri,et al.  A new methodology for correcting the signal cumulative phenomenon on injection rate measurements , 2008 .

[14]  Raul Payri,et al.  Flow regime effects over non-cavitating diesel injection nozzles , 2012 .