Curriculum Viability Indicators: A Delphi Study to Determine Standards and Inhibitors of a Curriculum

Curriculum evaluation is typically done by using quality standards defined by accrediting bodies. This does not include inhibitors that hinder the achievement of standards. Hence, to address both standards and inhibitors, we have coined the new concept of "curriculum viability." This study establishes consensus among experts on curriculum viability indicators, i.e. standards and inhibitors, and aims to provide a framework for evaluating the curriculum viability. The study was done in two phases. In the first phase, a consensus was established on the curriculum viability indicators using the Modified Delphi Technique using two rounds. In the first round of the Delphi process, 25 experts participated, which were reduced to 19 in the second round. After two rounds, experts developed a consensus on 40 out of 44 items. These included 27 standards and 13 inhibitors. In the second phase, 18 experts rank-ordered the indicators according to their relative importance in the areas of educational content and strategies, faculty, leadership, assessment, students, educational/working environment, communication, and technology. The list of indicators provides a framework for evaluating the curriculum viability, and their ordering enables curriculum managers to prioritize them during curriculum evaluation.

[1]  J. V. van Merrienboer,et al.  Determining ‘curriculum viability’ through standards and inhibitors of curriculum quality: a scoping review , 2019, BMC Medical Education.

[2]  Medha A Joshi,et al.  Quality assurance in medical education , 2012, Indian journal of pharmacology.

[3]  C. Fernández-Llamazares,et al.  Two-round Delphi technique for the consensual design of a paediatric pharmaceutical care model. , 2013, Pharmacological research.

[4]  C. Powell.  The Delphi technique: myths and realities. , 2003, Journal of advanced nursing.

[5]  M. Ostapczuk,et al.  Development and evaluation of a questionnaire to measure the perceived implementation of the mission statement of a competency based curriculum , 2012, BMC Medical Education.

[6]  R. M. Harden,et al.  The learning environment and the curriculum , 2001, Medical teacher.

[7]  H. Karle.  World Federation for Medical Education Policy on international recognition of medical schools' programme. , 2008, Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore.

[8]  M. Zarrintan,et al.  Identifying outcome-based indicators and developing a curriculum for a continuing medical education programme on rational prescribing using a modified Delphi process , 2008, BMC medical education.

[9]  Janet Grant,et al.  Designing an evaluation framework for WFME basic standards for medical education , 2016, Medical teacher.

[10]  J. Boulet,et al.  The importance of medical education accreditation standards , 2012, Medical teacher.

[11]  Don W. Edgar.  Learning Theories and Historical Events Affecting Instructional Design in Education , 2012 .

[12]  . G.Ravindran,et al.  Novel Findings in Chromosome Image Segmentation Using Discrete Cosine Transform Based Gradient Vector Flow Active Contours , 2007 .

[13]  J. V. van Merrienboer,et al.  A Delphi study of medical professionalism in Arabian countries: The Four-Gates model , 2014, Medical teacher.

[14]  H. Karle.  Global Standards and Accreditation in Medical Education: A View from the WFME , 2006, Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges.

[15]  D. Dolmans,et al.  Unravelling quality culture in higher education: a realist review , 2017 .

[16]  Y. Steinert,et al.  Twelve tips for curriculum renewal , 2015, Medical teacher.

[17]  S Abrahamson,et al.  Diseases of the curriculum. , 1978, Journal of medical education.

[18]  P. Shekelle,et al.  The effect of panel membership and feedback on ratings in a two-round Delphi survey: results of a randomized controlled trial. , 1999, Medical care.

[19]  Ann W Frye,et al.  Program evaluation models and related theories: AMEE Guide No. 67 , 2012, Medical teacher.

[20]  Valerie Ruhe,et al.  The 2011 Program Evaluation Standards: a framework for quality in medical education programme evaluations. , 2012, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[21]  M. Sajjad,et al.  Measuring assessment standards in undergraduate medical programs: Development and validation of AIM tool , 2018, Pakistan journal of medical sciences.

[22]  M. Rezaeian,et al.  Necessity of Accreditation Standards for Quality Assurance of Medical Basic Sciences , 2013, Iranian journal of public health.