Critical importance of stimulus unawareness for the production of subliminal psychodynamic activation effects: a meta-analytic review.

Meta-analysis that assessed the magnitude of behavior change produced by subliminal vs. supraliminal drive-related stimuli was performed on all subliminal psychodynamic activation (SPA) studies that employed both types of stimuli (N of studies = 11, N of subliminal-supraliminal comparisons = 43). The analysis revealed that subliminal presentation of drive-related stimuli produced significantly stronger effects on behavior than supraliminal presentation of the same stimuli. Stimulus content, type of outcome measure, and subject characteristics all influenced the magnitude of subliminal-supraliminal response differences. These results support Silverman's (1983) hypothesis that drive-related stimuli must be presented subliminally in order to produce SPA effects. Furthermore, given the pattern of subliminal-supraliminal effect sizes obtained, a partial cue hypothesis of SPA effects is not tenable. Implications of these findings for research that examines the restricting effects of awareness on responding to drive- and affect-related stimuli are discussed.

[1]  L. Silverman,et al.  A FURTHER STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF SUBLIMINAL AGGRESSIVE STIMULATION ON THINKING , 1966, Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease.

[2]  P. Merikle,et al.  Unconscious perception revisited , 1982, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  L. Silverman,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF SUBLIMINAL DRIVE STIMULATION ON THE SPEECH OF STUTTERERS , 1972, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[4]  R. S. Harris,et al.  Effect of tachistoscopic stimulation of subconscious oedipal wishes on competitive performance: a failure to replicate. , 1982, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[5]  L. Silverman,et al.  THE EFFECTS OF SUBLIMINAL, SUPRALIMINAL AND VOCALIZED AGGRESSION ON THE EGO FUNCTIONING OF SCHIZOPHRENICS , 1968, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[6]  D. Silverman,et al.  A CLINICAL-EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH TO THE STUDY OF SUBLIMINAL STIUMLATION: THE EFFECTS OF A DRIVE-RELATED STIMULUS UPON RORSCHACH RESPONSES. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[7]  L. Silverman,et al.  ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN AGGRESSIVE ACTIVATION, SYMBIOTIC MERGING, INTACTNESS OF BODY BOUNDARIES, AND MANIFEST PATHOLOGY IN SCHIZOPHRENICS , 1970, The Journal of nervous and mental disease.

[8]  D. G. Shulman,et al.  An experimental investigation of Kernberg's and Kohut's theories of narcissism. , 1988, Journal of clinical psychology.

[9]  Laurel W. Oliver,et al.  Career-Intervention Outcome: What Contributes to Client Gain?. , 1988 .

[10]  K. Heilbrun.  Silverman's subliminal psychodynamic activation: a failure to replicate. , 1980, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[11]  Mommy and I are one. Implications for psychotherapy. , 1985 .

[12]  Louise Cox.  DEPRESSIVE SYMPTOMS AS AFFECTED BY AGGRESSIVE STIMULI SUBLIMINALLY AND SUPRALIMINALLY PRESENTED. , 1974 .

[13]  R. Rosenthal.  The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results , 1979 .

[14]  R. Rosenthal.  Meta-analytic procedures for social research , 1984 .

[15]  R. Fudin.  Subliminal Psychodynamic Activation: Mommy and I are Not Yet One , 1986 .

[16]  R. Bornstein.  Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. , 1989 .

[17]  J. Kihlstrom.  The cognitive unconscious. , 1987, Science.

[18]  Steven R. Brown,et al.  The Search for Oneness , 1982 .

[19]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[20]  H. Shevrin,et al.  The subliminal psychodynamic activation method. A critical review. , 1988, The American psychologist.

[21]  G. Matt,et al.  Decision rules for selecting effect sizes in meta-analysis: a review and reanalysis of psychotherapy outcome studies. , 1989, Psychological bulletin.

[22]  R. Zajonc.  On the primacy of affect. , 1984 .

[23]  How restricted are the restricting effects? A reply. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.