The place of routine urine testing on admission to hospital

An audit of routine urine testing by dipsticks at a large private provincial hospital analysed 2294 patient records. No result was recorded in 12% of records. Abnormal but expected results were obtained in 9% of cases. Of the 4% of unexpectedly abnormal results, in only one‐third of patients was the attending practitioner aware of these results and, in fewer than one‐fifth of the patients, were further diagnostic tests performed. In not one case was treatment altered.

[1]  이재희,et al.  Urinalysis , 1898, Texas Medical Journal.

[2]  H. Braunstein Efficacy of the routine admission urinalysis. , 1987, The American journal of medicine.

[3]  D. Kiel,et al.  The urinalysis: a critical appraisal. , 1987, The Medical clinics of North America.

[4]  C. Fraser Urine analysis: current performance and strategies for improvement. , 1985, British medical journal.

[5]  E. Wong,et al.  'Routine urinalysis'. Is the dipstick enough? , 1985, JAMA.

[6]  J F Zilva,et al.  Is unselective biochemical urine testing cost effective? , 1985, British medical journal.