Schrödinger filtering: a precise EEG despiking technique for EEG-fMRI gradient artifact

In EEG data acquired in the presence of fMRI, gradient-related spike artifacts contaminate the signal following the common preprocessing step of average artifact subtraction. Spike artifacts compromise EEG data quality since they overlap with the EEG signal in frequency, thereby confounding frequency-based inferences on activity. As well, spike artifacts can inflate or deflate correlations among time series, thereby confounding inferences on functional connectivity. We present Schrödinger filtering, which uses the Schrödinger equation to decompose the spike-containing input. The basis functions of the decomposition are localized and pulse-shaped, and selectively capture the various input peaks, with the spike components clustered at the beginning of the spectrum. Schrödinger filtering automatically subtracts the spike components from the data. On real and simulated data, we show that Schrödinger filtering (1) simultaneously accomplishes high spike removal and high signal preservation without affecting evoked activity, and (2) reduces spurious pairwise correlations in spontaneous activity. In these regards, Schrödinger filtering was significantly better than three other despiking techniques: median filtering, amplitude thresholding, and wavelet denoising. These results encourage the use of Schrödinger filtering in future EEG-fMRI pipelines, as well as in other spike-related applications (e.g., fMRI motion artifact removal or action potential extraction).

[1]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Independent Vector Analysis for Gradient Artifact Removal in Concurrent EEG-fMRI Data , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[2]  Mark S. Cohen,et al.  Simultaneous EEG and fMRI made easy , 2001, NeuroImage.

[3]  Gabriel Curio,et al.  High-frequency (600 Hz) population spikes in human EEG delineate thalamic and cortical fMRI activation sites , 2008, NeuroImage.

[4]  Karen J Mullinger,et al.  Improved artifact correction for combined electroencephalography/functional MRI by means of synchronization and use of vectorcardiogram recordings , 2008, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[5]  R. Kreis,et al.  Restoration of electrophysiological signals distorted by inductive effects of magnetic field gradients during MR sequences , 1999, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[6]  Waqas Majeed,et al.  Simultaneous FMRI and electrophysiology in the rodent brain. , 2010, Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE.

[7]  Don H. Johnson,et al.  Signal-to-noise ratio , 2006, Scholarpedia.

[8]  Afraim Salek-Haddadi,et al.  Event-Related fMRI with Simultaneous and Continuous EEG: Description of the Method and Initial Case Report , 2001, NeuroImage.

[9]  Rodolfo Abreu,et al.  EEG-Informed fMRI: A Review of Data Analysis Methods , 2018, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[10]  Frédéric Grouiller,et al.  A comparative study of different artefact removal algorithms for EEG signals acquired during functional MRI , 2007, NeuroImage.

[11]  Kenneth Hugdahl,et al.  Realignment parameter-informed artefact correction for simultaneous EEG–fMRI recordings , 2009, NeuroImage.

[12]  P. Westfall Kurtosis as Peakedness, 1905–2014. R.I.P. , 2014, The American statistician.

[13]  Masato Yumoto,et al.  Stepping stone sampling for retrieving artifact-free electroencephalogram during functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2003, NeuroImage.

[14]  Karen J. Mullinger,et al.  Reducing the gradient artefact in simultaneous EEG-fMRI by adjusting the subject's axial position , 2011, NeuroImage.

[15]  Taous-Meriem Laleg-Kirati,et al.  Semi-classical signal analysis , 2010, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[16]  Michiro Negishi,et al.  Removal of time-varying gradient artifacts from EEG data acquired during continuous fMRI , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[17]  Robert Turner,et al.  A Method for Removing Imaging Artifact from Continuous EEG Recorded during Functional MRI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[18]  S. Debener,et al.  Properties of the ballistocardiogram artefact as revealed by EEG recordings at 1.5, 3 and 7 T static magnetic field strength. , 2008, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[19]  Catie Chang,et al.  Development, validation, and comparison of ICA-based gradient artifact reduction algorithms for simultaneous EEG-spiral in/out and echo-planar fMRI recordings , 2009, NeuroImage.

[20]  Karen J. Mullinger,et al.  Exploring the origins of EEG motion artefacts during simultaneous fMRI acquisition: Implications for motion artefact correction , 2018, NeuroImage.

[21]  Johann Glaser,et al.  FACET – a “Flexible Artifact Correction and Evaluation Toolbox” for concurrently recorded EEG/fMRI data , 2013, BMC Neuroscience.

[22]  F Kruggel,et al.  Recording of the event‐related potentials during functional MRI at 3.0 Tesla field strength , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[23]  Rami K. Niazy,et al.  Removal of FMRI environment artifacts from EEG data using optimal basis sets , 2005, NeuroImage.

[24]  David W. Carmichael,et al.  Image quality issues , 2009 .

[25]  Louis Lemieux,et al.  Towards motion insensitive EEG-fMRI: Correcting motion-induced voltages and gradient artefact instability in EEG using an fMRI prospective motion correction (PMC) system , 2016, NeuroImage.

[26]  J. R. Baker,et al.  Simultaneous functional magnetic resonance imaging and electrophysiological recording , 1995 .

[27]  Hazem Refai,et al.  Automated Pipeline for EEG Artifact Reduction (APPEAR) Recorded during fMRI , 2019 .

[28]  B. Burle,et al.  Spatial and temporal resolutions of EEG: Is it really black and white? A scalp current density view , 2015, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[29]  Daniel Brandeis,et al.  Synchronization facilitates removal of MRI artefacts from concurrent EEG recordings and increases usable bandwidth , 2006, NeuroImage.

[30]  Taous-Meriem Laleg-Kirati,et al.  On semi-classical questions related to signal analysis , 2011, Asymptot. Anal..

[31]  P. J. Green,et al.  Density Estimation for Statistics and Data Analysis , 1987 .

[32]  Anna M. Beres,et al.  Time is of the Essence: A Review of Electroencephalography (EEG) and Event-Related Brain Potentials (ERPs) in Language Research , 2017, Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback.

[33]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal , 2001, Nature.

[34]  G. Glover Overview of functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2011, Neurosurgery clinics of North America.

[35]  Sebastian Bosse,et al.  EEGSourceSim: A framework for realistic simulation of EEG scalp data using MRI-based forward models and biologically plausible signals and noise , 2019, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[36]  Günter Edlinger,et al.  Reference layer adaptive filtering (RLAF) for EEG artifact reduction in simultaneous EEG-fMRI , 2017, Journal of neural engineering.

[37]  Abderrazak Chahid,et al.  Residual Water Suppression Using the Squared Eigenfunctions of the Schrödinger Operator , 2019, IEEE Access.

[38]  Eric Achten,et al.  Spectral data de‐noising using semi‐classical signal analysis: application to localized MRS , 2016, NMR in biomedicine.

[39]  Dirk Ostwald,et al.  A perceptual decision making EEG/fMRI data set , 2018, bioRxiv.

[40]  J. Gotman,et al.  Combining EEG and fMRI: A multimodal tool for epilepsy research , 2006, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[41]  Stephen D. Mayhew,et al.  EEG-fMRI Based Information Theoretic Characterization of the Human Perceptual Decision System , 2012, PloS one.

[42]  Thilo Womelsdorf,et al.  Adaptive spike-artifact removal from local field potentials uncovers prominent beta and gamma band neuronal synchronization , 2020, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[43]  Hermann Hinrichs,et al.  Simultaneously recorded EEG–fMRI: Removal of gradient artifacts by subtraction of head movement related average artifact waveforms , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[44]  Ronald M. Aarts,et al.  Gradient Artefact Correction and Evaluation of the EEG Recorded Simultaneously with fMRI Data Using Optimised Moving-Average , 2016, Journal of medical engineering.

[45]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  Understanding gradient artefacts in simultaneous EEG/fMRI , 2009, NeuroImage.

[46]  Mark S. Cohen,et al.  Simultaneous EEG and fMRI of the alpha rhythm , 2002, Neuroreport.

[47]  Jeff H. Duyn,et al.  Statistical feature extraction for artifact removal from concurrent fMRI-EEG recordings , 2012, NeuroImage.

[48]  Vladimir Krajca,et al.  Artifacts in Simultaneous hdEEG/fMRI Imaging: A Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction Approach † , 2019, Sensors.

[49]  S Warach,et al.  Monitoring the patient's EEG during echo planar MRI. , 1993, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[50]  Karen J. Mullinger,et al.  Reference layer artefact subtraction (RLAS): A novel method of minimizing EEG artefacts during simultaneous fMRI , 2014, NeuroImage.

[51]  Maxim Zaitsev,et al.  EEG-fMRI Gradient Artifact Correction by Multiple Motion-Related Templates , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[52]  Gian Luca Romani,et al.  Complete artifact removal for EEG recorded during continuous fMRI using independent component analysis , 2007, NeuroImage.

[53]  K J Werhahn,et al.  Electroencephalography during functional echo‐planar imaging: Detection of epileptic spikes using post‐processing methods , 2000, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[54]  Peihao Li,et al.  Signal denoising based on the Schrödinger operator's eigenspectrum and a curvature constraint , 2019, IET Signal Process..

[55]  D. Tank,et al.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.