Mode of questionnaire administration can have serious effects on data quality.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] C. Scott. Research on Mail Surveys , 1961 .
[2] S L Warner,et al. Randomized response: a survey technique for eliminating evasive answer bias. , 1965, Journal of the American Statistical Association.
[3] Chava Nachmias,et al. Research Methods in the Social Sciences , 1976 .
[4] J. Siemiatycki. A comparison of mail, telephone, and home interview strategies for household health surveys. , 1979, American journal of public health.
[5] N. Hatton. ASKING QUESTIONS , 1979, The Medical journal of Australia.
[6] Robert M. Groves,et al. Surveys by Telephone: A National Comparison with Personal Interviews , 1980 .
[7] John Dowling,et al. Interview vs. paper-and-pencil administration of the McGill pain questionnaire , 1981, PAIN.
[8] Norman M. Bradburn,et al. Chapter 8 – Response Effects1 , 1983 .
[9] S. Presser,et al. Questions and Answers in Attitude Surveys: Experiments on Question Form, Wording, and Context , 1996 .
[10] James D. Wright,et al. Handbook of Survey Research. , 1985 .
[11] H. Genn. Health Surveys in Practice and in Potential (Book). , 1986 .
[12] D. Brambilla,et al. A comparison of responses to mailed questionnaires and telephone interviews in a mixed mode health survey. , 1987, American journal of epidemiology.
[13] J. Krosnick,et al. AN EVALUATION OF A COGNITIVE THEORY OF RESPONSE-ORDER EFFECTS IN SURVEY MEASUREMENT , 1987 .
[14] Roger Tourangeau,et al. Cognitive Aspects of Survey Methodology: Building a Bridge Between Disciplines. , 1987 .
[15] L W Chambers,et al. Sensitivity to Change and the Effect of Mode of Administration on Health Status Measurement , 1987, Medical care.
[16] D. Dooley. Social Research Methods , 1990 .
[17] R. Groves,et al. Telephone Survey Methodology. , 1990 .
[18] Leslie F. Clark,et al. RATING SCALES NUMERIC VALUES MAY CHANGE THE MEANING OF SCALE LABELS , 1991 .
[19] Hans-Jürgen Hippler,et al. CONFIDENTIALITY ASSURANCES IN SURVEYS: REASSURANCE OR THREAT? , 1992 .
[20] D. Leeuw,et al. Data Quality in Mail, Telephone and Face to Face Surveys. , 1992 .
[21] Michael R. Weeks,et al. Computer-assisted survey information collection: a review of CASIC methods and their implications for survey operations: , 1992 .
[22] J. E. Brazier,et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. , 1992, BMJ.
[23] Agreement between interview data and a self-administered questionnaire on dietary supplement use. , 1994, European journal of clinical nutrition.
[24] C. McHorney,et al. Comparisons of the Costs and Quality of Norms for the SF-36 Health Survey Collected by Mail Versus Telephone Interview: Results From a National Survey , 1994, Medical care.
[25] J. Santelli,et al. AIDS and behavioural risk factors in women in inner city Baltimore: a comparison of telephone and face to face surveys. , 1994, Journal of epidemiology and community health.
[26] Hans-Jürgen Hippler,et al. SUBSEQUENT QUESTIONS MAY INFLUENCE ANSWERS TO PRECEDING QUESTIONS IN MAIL SURVEYS , 1995 .
[27] Ian MacKay,et al. ASKING THE QUESTIONS , 1995, Engineered to Speak.
[28] H A Guess,et al. Does the mode of questionnaire administration affect the reporting of urinary symptoms? , 1995, Urology.
[29] G P Samsa,et al. Are health-related quality-of-life measures affected by the mode of administration? , 1996, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[30] Seymour Sudman,et al. Thinking about Answers: The Application of Cognitive Process to Survey Methodology , 1996 .
[31] Tom W. Smith,et al. ASKING SENSITIVE QUESTIONS THE IMPACT OF DATA COLLECTION MODE, QUESTION FORMAT, AND QUESTION CONTEXT , 1996 .
[32] Ann Bowling,et al. Research Methods in Health: Investigating Health and Health Services , 1997 .
[33] W M Tierney,et al. Assessing inner-city patients' hospital experiences. A controlled trial of telephone interviews versus mailed surveys. , 1997, Medical care.
[34] R W Sanson-Fisher,et al. An examination of self- and telephone-administered modes of administration for the Australian SF-36. , 1998, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[35] A. Bowling. Research Methods in Health , 1998 .
[36] S. Presser,et al. Data collection mode and social desirability bias in self-reported religious attendance : Church attendance in the United States , 1998 .
[37] S. M. Rogers,et al. Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: increased reporting with computer survey technology. , 1998, Science.
[38] Bärbel Knäuper,et al. The Impact of Age and Education on Response Order Effects in Attitude Measurement , 1999 .
[39] F. J. Fowler,et al. Comparing telephone and mail responses to the CAHPS survey instrument. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study. , 1999, Medical care.
[40] A Bowling,et al. Short Form 36 (SF-36) Health Survey questionnaire: which normative data should be used? Comparisons between the norms provided by the Omnibus Survey in Britain, the Health Survey for England and the Oxford Healthy Life Survey. , 1999, Journal of public health medicine.
[41] Epidemiology deserves better questionnaires. , 1999, International journal of epidemiology.
[42] D. Dillman. Mail and internet surveys , 1999 .
[43] Seymour Sudman,et al. Cognition, aging, and self-reports , 1999 .
[44] R A Lyons,et al. SF-36 scores vary by method of administration: implications for study design. , 1999, Journal of public health medicine.
[45] Denise C. Park,et al. Cognitive Aging: A Primer , 1999 .
[46] M. Carey,et al. Self-Administered Questionnaires versus Face-to-Face Interviews in Assessing Sexual Behavior in Young Women , 2000, Archives of sexual behavior.
[47] M. Dewey,et al. Assessing research outcomes by postal questionnaire with telephone follow-up. TOTAL Study Group. Trial of Occupational Therapy and Leisure. , 2000, International journal of epidemiology.
[48] Denise C. Park,et al. The basic mechanisms accounting for age-related decline in cognitive function. , 2000 .
[49] R. Pruchno,et al. Interview Modality , 2000 .
[50] L. Rips,et al. The Psychology of Survey Response , 2000 .
[51] R. Rusek,et al. A comparison of the reliability of self-reported drug use and sexual behaviors using computer-assisted versus face-to-face interviewing. , 2000, AIDS education and prevention : official publication of the International Society for AIDS Education.
[52] The Psychology of Survey Response: Preface , 2000 .
[53] A. Kriska,et al. Self-administered questionnaire compared with interview to assess past-year physical activity. , 2000, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.
[54] M. Clarke,et al. Methods to influence response to postal questionnaires , 2001 .
[55] G. Locke,et al. Prospective comparison of endoscopy patient satisfaction surveys: e-mail versus standard mail versus telephone , 2001, American Journal of Gastroenterology.
[56] X. Badia,et al. Effect of Mode of Administration on I–PSS Scores in a Large BPH Patient Population , 2001, European Urology.
[57] Anne M Johnson,et al. Effect of computer-assisted self-interviews on reporting of sexual HIV risk behaviours in a general population sample: a methodological experiment , 2001, AIDS.
[58] E. Perez-stable,et al. The effect of data collection mode on smoking attitudes and behavior in young African American and Latina women. Face-to-face interview versus self-administered questionnaires. , 2001, Evaluation review.
[59] P. Ravaud,et al. Impact of reminders and method of questionnaire distribution on patient response to mail-back satisfaction survey. , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.
[60] E McColl,et al. Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients. , 2001, Health technology assessment.
[61] D Banister,et al. A multidimensional model of the quality of life in older age , 2002, Aging & mental health.
[62] Christopher J. McCarthy,et al. Paper-and-Pencil Or Online? , 2002, Assessment.
[63] N. Bellamy,et al. A comparative study of telephone versus onsite completion of the WOMAC 3.0 osteoarthritis index. , 2002, The Journal of rheumatology.
[64] D. Acar,et al. Effect of administration mode (patient vs physician) and patient's educational level on the Turkish version of the International Prostate Symptom Score , 2002, International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association.
[65] Bias in patient assessments of general practice: general practice assessment survey scores in surgery and postal responders. , 2003, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.
[66] L. Midanik,et al. Telephone versus in-person interviews for alcohol use: results of the 2000 National Alcohol Survey. , 2003, Drug and alcohol dependence.
[67] A. Erol,et al. Mode of administration of international prostate symptom score in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms: physician vs self , 2004, Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases.
[68] A. Glaser,et al. Influence of proxy respondents and mode of administration on health status assessment following central nervous system tumours in childhood , 2004, Quality of Life Research.
[69] T. Peters,et al. Assessing mental health in primary care research using standardized scales: can it be carried out over the telephone? , 2004, Psychological Medicine.
[70] Robyn Attewell,et al. A comparison of an electronic version of the SF-36 General Health Questionnaire to the standard paper version , 2002, Quality of Life Research.
[71] A. Wu,et al. The effect of mode of administration on Medical Outcomes Study health ratings and EuroQol scores in AIDS , 2004, Quality of Life Research.
[72] N. Schwarz,et al. Thinking About Answers: The Application of Cognitive Processes to Survey Methodology , 1995, Quality of Life Research.
[73] Sanjaya Mishra,et al. Research methods in the social sciences , 2005 .
[74] D. Dillman. Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, 2nd ed. , 2007 .