Parietal Representation of Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Magnitude

The close behavioral parallels between the processing of quantitative information conveyed by symbolic and non-symbolic stimuli led to the hypothesis that there exists a common cerebral representation of quantity (Dehaene, Dehaene-Lambertz, & Cohen, 1998). The neural basis underlying the encoding of number magnitude has been localized to regions in and around the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) by brain-imaging studies. However, it has never been demonstrated that these same regions are also involved in the quantitative processing of nonsymbolic stimuli. Using functional brain imaging, we explicitly tested the hypothesis of a common substrate. Angles, lines, and two-digit numbers were presented pairwise, one to the left and one to the right of the fixation point. In the three comparison tasks, participants (n = 18) pressed the key on the side of the largest quantity. In the three control tasks, they indicated the side on which dimming occurred. A conjunction analysis between the three subtractions (comparison task-control task) revealed a site in left IPS that is specifically responsive when two stimuli have to be compared quantitatively, irrespective of stimulus format. The results confirm the hypothesis that quantity is represented by a common mechanism for both symbolic and nonsymbolic stimuli in IPS. In addition, the interaction between task and type of stimulus identified a region anterior to the conjunction site, not specific for quantitative processing, but reflecting general processes loaded by number processing.

[1]  Alvaro Pascual Leone , 1916 .

[2]  Donald McEwen Johnson,et al.  Confidence and speed in the two-category judgment , 1939 .

[3]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[4]  R. Moyer Comparing objects in memory: Evidence suggesting an internal psychophysics , 1973 .

[5]  Paul B. Buckley,et al.  Comparisons of digits and dot patterns. , 1974, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  R. Gottlieb,et al.  Thinking Big , 1977 .

[7]  James V. Hinrichs,et al.  Two-digit number comparison: Use of place information. , 1981 .

[8]  G. R. Potts,et al.  Mental comparison of size and magnitude: size congruity effects. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Paul Kinahan,et al.  Analytic 3D image reconstruction using all detected events , 1989 .

[10]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  M. Brysbaert Arabic number reading: On the nature of the numerical scale and the origin of phonological recoding. , 1995 .

[12]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Spatial registration and normalization of images , 1995 .

[13]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multi-modality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1996, Proceedings of the Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis.

[14]  G Brix,et al.  Performance evaluation of a whole-body PET scanner using the NEMA protocol. National Electrical Manufacturers Association. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[15]  Guy Marchal,et al.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Abstract representations of numbers in the animal and human brain , 1998, Trends in Neurosciences.

[17]  Mauro PESENTI,et al.  Neuroanatomical substrates of Arabic number processing, numerical comparison and simple addition: A PET study. , 1998, NeuroImage.

[18]  E. Spelke,et al.  Sources of mathematical thinking: behavioral and brain-imaging evidence. , 1999, Science.

[19]  E. Mayer,et al.  A pure case of Gerstmann syndrome with a subangular lesion. , 1999, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Generality of Parietal Involvement in Visual Attention , 1999, Neuron.

[21]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Understanding dissociations in dyscalculia: a brain imaging study of the impact of number size on the cerebral networks for exact and approximate calculation. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  E. Spelke,et al.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 2000, Cognition.

[23]  B. Mazoyer,et al.  Neural Correlates of Simple and Complex Mental Calculation , 2001, NeuroImage.

[24]  D. LeBihan,et al.  Modulation of Parietal Activation by Semantic Distance in a Number Comparison Task , 2001, NeuroImage.

[25]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Dissociating neural correlates of cognitive components in mental calculation. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Neuroimaging of cognitive functions in human parietal cortex , 2001, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[27]  Xavier Seron,et al.  The number sense theory needs more empirical evidence , 2001 .

[28]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  Decade breaks in the mental number line? Putting the tens and units back in different bins , 2001, Cognition.

[29]  Patrick Dupont,et al.  The Quantitative Nature of a Visual Task Differentiates between Ventral and Dorsal Stream , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Semantic priming in number naming , 2002, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[31]  Mingxiong Huang,et al.  Neural representation of interval encoding and decision making. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[32]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Response-Selection-Related Parietal Activation during Number Comparison , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[33]  Philippe Pinel,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Cerebral Representations of Number, Size, and Luminance during Comparative Judgments , 2004, Neuron.

[34]  Pierre Rainville,et al.  Rapid deterioration of pain sensory-discriminative information in short-term memory , 2004, Pain.

[35]  Silke M Göbel,et al.  Cognitive Neuroscience: Acting on Numbers , 2004, Current Biology.

[36]  Wim Fias,et al.  Representation of Number in Animals and Humans: A Neural Model , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  Valéria Csépe,et al.  Access to numerical information is dependent on the modality of stimulus presentation in mental addition: a combined ERP and behavioral study. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[38]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Numerical Magnitude in the Human Parietal Lobe Tests of Representational Generality and Domain Specificity , 2004, Neuron.

[39]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Electrophysiological evidence for differential processing of numerical quantity and order in humans. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[40]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Forward and backward number translation requires conceptual mediation in both balanced and unbalanced bilinguals. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.