Activated sludge model 2d calibration with full-scale WWTP data: comparing model parameter identifiability with influent and operational uncertainty

The present work developed a model for the description of a full-scale wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) (Manresa, Catalonia, Spain) for further plant upgrades based on the systematic parameter calibration of the activated sludge model 2d (ASM2d) using a methodology based on the Fisher information matrix. The influent was characterized for the application of the ASM2d and the confidence interval of the calibrated parameters was also assessed. No expert knowledge was necessary for model calibration and a huge available plant database was converted into more useful information. The effect of the influent and operating variables on the model fit was also studied using these variables as calibrating parameters and keeping the ASM2d kinetic and stoichiometric parameters, which traditionally are the calibration parameters, at their default values. Such an “inversion” of the traditional way of model fitting allowed evaluating the sensitivity of the main model outputs regarding the influent and the operating variables changes. This new approach is able to evaluate the capacity of the operational variables used by the WWTP feedback control loops to overcome external disturbances in the influent and kinetic/stoichiometric model parameters uncertainties. In addition, the study of the influence of operating variables on the model outputs provides useful information to select input and output variables in decentralized control structures.

[1]  P Grau,et al.  Supervisory control strategies for the new WWTP of Galindo-Bilbao: the long run from the conceptual design to the full-scale experimental validation. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[2]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process - A framework and guidance , 2007, Environ. Model. Softw..

[3]  Bengt Carlsson,et al.  Feedforward control of the external carbon flow rate in an activated sludge process , 2001 .

[4]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  A practical protocol for calibration of nutrient removal wastewater treatment models , 2011 .

[5]  L Benedetti,et al.  Wastewater treatment modelling: dealing with uncertainties. , 2009, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[6]  Marc B. Neumann,et al.  Biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal in membrane bioreactors: model development and parameter estimation , 2013, Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering.

[7]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Respirometry in control of the activated sludge process : benchmarking control strategies , 2015 .

[8]  G Olsson,et al.  Instrumentation, control and automation in the water industry--state-of-the-art and new challenges. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[9]  Mogens Henze,et al.  Activated sludge models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3 , 2015 .

[10]  A Seco,et al.  Calibration and simulation of ASM2d at different temperatures in a phosphorus removal pilot plant. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[11]  B Carlsson,et al.  Feed-forward control of the external carbon flow rate in an activated sludge process. , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[12]  K V Gernaey,et al.  Modelling and control strategy testing of biological and chemical phosphorus removal at Avedøre WWTP. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[13]  Gürkan Sin,et al.  Uncertainty analysis in WWTP model applications: a critical discussion using an example from design. , 2009, Water research.

[14]  J J Heijnen,et al.  Modelling the start-up of a full-scale biological phosphorous and nitrogen removing WWTP. , 2002, Water research.

[15]  Rui Zhang,et al.  Simulation and optimization of a full-scale Carrousel oxidation ditch plant for municipal wastewater treatment , 2011 .

[16]  J Kruit,et al.  A practical protocol for dynamic modelling of activated sludge systems. , 2002, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[17]  John P. Norton Algebraic sensitivity analysis of environmental models , 2008, Environ. Model. Softw..

[18]  Javier Lafuente,et al.  Systematic identifiability study based on the Fisher Information Matrix for reducing the number of parameters calibration of an activated sludge model , 2009, Environ. Model. Softw..

[19]  P. Reichert,et al.  Identifiability and uncertainty analysis of the river water quality model no. 1 (RWQM1). , 2001, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[20]  J Ferrer,et al.  Calibration and simulation of two large wastewater treatment plants operated for nutrient removal. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[21]  Gürkan Sin,et al.  A critical comparison of systematic calibration protocols for activated sludge models: a SWOT analysis. , 2005, Water research.

[22]  I. Takács A dynamic model of the clarification-thickening process , 1991 .

[23]  Ingmar Nopens,et al.  Impact of influent data frequency and model structure on the quality of WWTP model calibration and uncertainty. , 2012, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[24]  Derin Orhon,et al.  A description of three methods for the determination of the initial inert particulate chemical oxygen demand of wastewater , 1994 .

[25]  D. Vrecko,et al.  Improvement of ammonia removal in activated sludge process with feedforward-feedback aeration controllers. , 2006, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[26]  Ulf Jeppsson,et al.  Modelling Aspects of Wastewater Treatment Processes , 1996 .

[27]  Krist V. Gernaey,et al.  Calibration and validation of a model describing complete autotrophic nitrogen removal in a granular SBR system , 2013 .

[28]  K. Gernaey,et al.  A comprehensive model calibration procedure for activated sludge models , 2003 .

[29]  Willy Verstraete,et al.  Reducing the size of a nitrogen removal activated sludge plant by shortening the retention time of inert solids via sludge storage , 2000 .

[30]  Derin Orhon,et al.  Modelling of activated sludge systems , 1994 .

[31]  Andrej Pázman,et al.  Nonlinear Regression , 2019, Handbook of Regression Analysis With Applications in R.

[32]  S Winkler,et al.  A guideline for simulation studies of wastewater treatment plants. , 2004, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[33]  Thomas Bley,et al.  Using a carbon-based ASM3 EAWAG Bio-P for modelling the enhanced biological phosphorus removal in anaerobic/aerobic activated sludge systems , 2011, Bioprocess and biosystems engineering (Print).

[34]  Giorgio Mannina,et al.  Uncertainty assessment of a model for biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal: Application to a large wastewater treatment plant , 2012 .

[35]  J Ribes,et al.  Parameter subset selection for the dynamic calibration of activated sludge models (ASMs): experience versus systems analysis. , 2007, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[36]  W. Gujer,et al.  Activated sludge model No. 3 , 1995 .

[37]  Bernard De Baets,et al.  Uncertainty analysis of WWTP control strategies made feasible , 2012 .