Mechanical and Fluid-Dynamic Behaviour of Debris and Hyper-Concentrated Flows: Overview and Challenges

Debris and hyper-concentrated flows are among the most destructive of all water-related disasters. They mainly affect mountain areas in a wide range of morphoclimatic environments and in recent years have attracted more and more attention from the scientific and professional communities and concern from public awareness, due to the increasing frequency with which they occur and the death toll they claim. In this context, achieving a set of debris and hyper-concentrated flow constitutive equations is a task that has been given particular attention by scientists during the second half of the last century. In relation to these issues, this paper reviews the most updated and effective geotechnical and fluid-dynamic procedures nowadays available, suitable to predict the triggering and mobilising processes of these phenomena, and proposes a mathematical model that is able to assess the depth of the wave and the velocities of the liquid and solid phases of both non-stratified (mature) and stratified (immature) flows following flash-floods and dam-break events in one and two dimensional cases. Different experimental cases of dam-break situations in a square section channel were considered for the purpose of comparing results. These tools will allow, on one hand, to better focus on what to observe in the field and, on the other hand, to improve both mitigation measures and hazard mapping procedures.

[1]  T. E. Lang,et al.  A Biviscous Modified Bingham Model of Snow Avalanche Motion , 1983, Annals of Glaciology.

[2]  T. Strelkoff,et al.  Dam-Break Flood in a Prismatic Dry Channel , 1973 .

[3]  Hajime Nakagawa,et al.  Flood and Debris Flow Hydrograph Due to Collapse of a Natural Dam by Overtopping , 1993 .

[4]  Steve J. Poulos,et al.  THE STEADY STATE OF DEFORMATION , 1981 .

[5]  J. A. Sladen,et al.  The liquefaction of sands, a collapse surface approach , 1985 .

[6]  D. L. Fread,et al.  One-Dimensional Routing of Mud/Debris Flows Using NWS FLDWAV Model , 1997 .

[7]  R. Maccormack,et al.  The Effect of Viscosity in Hypervelocity Impact Cratering , 2003 .

[8]  Poul V. Lade,et al.  Closure of "Static Instability and Liquefaction of Loose Fine Sandy Slopes" , 1993 .

[9]  Stefano Mambretti,et al.  1D modelling of dam-break surges with floating debris , 2008 .

[10]  D. Gregory-Smith,et al.  Steady, Laminar, Flow Of Concentrated Mud Suspensions In Open Channel , 2010 .

[11]  Y. Vaid,et al.  Influence of generalized initial state and principal stress rotation on the undrained response of sands , 2002 .

[12]  THE BREAKING OF WAVES IN SHALLOW WATER , 1949 .

[13]  D. Eckersley,et al.  Instrumented laboratory flowslides , 1990 .

[14]  Luciano Picarelli,et al.  Mechanical Aspects of Flow-Like Movements in Granular and Fine Grained Soils , 2008 .

[15]  With Invariant Submanifolds,et al.  Systems of Conservation Laws , 2009 .

[16]  C. Deangeli.  The Role of Slope Geometry on Flowslide Occurrence , 2007 .

[17]  Ralph O. Kehle,et al.  Physical Processes in Geology , 1972 .

[18]  Chiara Deangeli,et al.  Laboratory Granular Flows generated by Slope Failures , 2008 .

[19]  H. T. Falvey,et al.  Numerical Methods Used to Model Unsteady Canal Flow , 1991 .

[20]  D. Hanes.  Studies on the Mechanics of Rapidly Flowing Granular-Fluid Materials. , 1983 .

[21]  M. Malin,et al.  Rheological properties of mudflows associated with the spring 1980 eruptions of Mount St. Helens Volcano, Washington , 1981 .

[22]  S. Egashira,et al.  Prediction of Debris Flow Characteristics in Mountain Torrents , 1997 .

[23]  S. Cowin,et al.  An Experimental Study of the Kinematics of Flow Through Hoppers , 1974 .

[24]  Bruce Hunt,et al.  Asymptotic Solution for Dam-Break Problem , 1982 .

[25]  Dam-break Shock Waves: A Two-phase ModelFor Mature And Immature Debris Flow , 2008 .

[26]  P. Julien,et al.  Two‐Dimensional Water Flood and Mudflow Simulation , 1993 .

[27]  R. Bagnold.  Experiments on a gravity-free dispersion of large solid spheres in a Newtonian fluid under shear , 1954, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[28]  S Okuda,et al.  Observations on the motion of a debris flow and its geomorphological effects , 1980 .

[29]  John G. Sakkas,et al.  1‐D Dam‐Break Flood‐Wave Propagation on Dry Bed , 1987 .

[30]  H. Norem,et al.  An approach to the physics and the modeling of submarine flowslides , 1990 .

[31]  B. V. Leer,et al.  Towards the Ultimate Conservative Difference Scheme , 1997 .

[32]  Gonzalo Castro,et al.  Liquefaction Evaluation Procedure , 1985 .

[33]  R. Dressler,et al.  Hydraulic resistance effect upon the dam-break functions , 1952 .