Texture-surround suppression of contour-shape coding in human vision

Contextual influences on neurons in the primary visual cortex have largely been studied using simple visual stimuli and their functional role is still poorly understood. Using a novel visual after-effect of perceived shape we show psychophysically that the coding of a contour's shape is inhibited by nearby parallel, but not orthogonal texture orientations. This suggests that neurons in the visual cortex that are suppressed by parallel orientations feed their outputs into higher visual areas that are involved in the processing of contour shape and in the recognition of objects.

[1]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Selectivity for polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in macaque visual cortex. , 1993, Science.

[2]  C. Connor,et al.  Shape representation in area V4: position-specific tuning for boundary conformation. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  C. Connor,et al.  Responses to contour features in macaque area V4. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  D. C. Essen,et al.  Neural responses to polar, hyperbolic, and Cartesian gratings in area V4 of the macaque monkey. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[5]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[6]  C. Clifford Perceptual adaptation: motion parallels orientation , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Neuronal responses to static texture patterns in area V1 of the alert macaque monkey. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[8]  Chao-Yi Li,et al.  Clustered Organization of Neurons with Similar Extra-Receptive Field Properties in the Primary Visual Cortex , 2002, Neuron.

[9]  J. Nelson,et al.  Orientation-selective inhibition from beyond the classic visual receptive field , 1978, Brain Research.

[10]  Nicolai Petkov,et al.  Contour and boundary detection improved by surround suppression of texture edges , 2004, Image Vis. Comput..

[11]  Elena Gheorghiu,et al.  The spatial feature underlying the shape-frequency and shape-amplitude after-effects , 2007, Vision Research.

[12]  J. B. Levitt,et al.  Contrast dependence of contextual effects in primate visual cortex , 1997, nature.

[13]  C. Blakemore,et al.  Lateral inhibition between orientation detectors in the cat's visual cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[14]  J. Movshon,et al.  Nature and interaction of signals from the receptive field center and surround in macaque V1 neurons. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[15]  F. Kingdom,et al.  Luminance-contrast properties of contour-shape processing revealed through the shape-frequency after-effect , 2006, Vision Research.

[16]  H. Jones,et al.  Surround suppression in primate V1. , 2001, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Response modulation by texture surround in primate area V1: Correlates of “popout” under anesthesia , 1999, Visual Neuroscience.

[18]  C. Heizmann,et al.  Clustered organization of S100 genes in human and mouse. , 1998, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[19]  J. Gallant,et al.  Natural Stimulation of the Nonclassical Receptive Field Increases Information Transmission Efficiency in V1 , 2002, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  C. Connor,et al.  Population coding of shape in area V4 , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  Nicolai Petkov,et al.  Suppression of contour perception by band-limited noise and its relation to nonclassical receptive field inhibition , 2003, Biological cybernetics.

[22]  Mark Georgeson,et al.  Visual Aftereffects: Cortical Neurons Change Their Tune , 2004, Current Biology.